The MOTIVE-PSP Initiative (Progressive Supranuclear Palsy)
NCT ID: NCT04691635
Last Updated: 2022-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
165 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-01
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study aims include verifying if specific motor, cognitive, language, cerebrospinal fluid and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of PSP diagnosis, phenotypization and progression over 1-year follow up. Motor evaluation will include recordings from wearable sensors.
Expected results include 1) improvement of PSP diagnosis and phenotypization; 2)improvement of evaluation of disease progression in the context of clinical trial; 3)enhancement of strategies to prevent falls and fractures in such patients leading, in turn, to significant cost savings for the National Health System.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Comprehensive ANd Multimodal Marker-based Cohort of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy(PSP)
NCT05579301
Remote Monitoring in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
NCT04753320
Risk Factors for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
NCT00431301
Postural Instability in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
NCT01563276
Neuropsychological Evaluation for Early Diagnosis of PSP
NCT03478124
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1)Cross-sectional phase:verify if specific motor, cognitive, language, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of diagnosis in PSP in the earliest stages of disease compared to Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC) and are able characterize the different PSP clinical phenotype 2)12-month longitudinal phase:verify if specific motor, cognitive, language, CSF and imaging assessments represent reliable biomarkers of disease progression also according to the clinical phenotype
Preliminary Data:
Cross-sectional data suggest that current motor, cognitive, language and imaging assessments may be useful in supporting the diagnosis of PSP compared to PD and HC, but not in characterizing the PSP clinical phenotypes. No robust data on wearable sensors and CSF biomarkers is available.
Longitudinal data on such biomarkers are lacking. As for cognition, preliminary data suggest that the Repeatable Battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) may evaluate cognitive trajectories in PSP with Richardson's syndrome.
Specific Aim 1:
Determine the feasibility, validity and reliability of application of digital biomarkers in PSP. Specifically if clinic-based wearable sensors and smartphone-based remote assessments can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes compared to standard rating scales.
For both points the hypothesis is that both clinic-based and smartphone-based wearable sensors outperform standard rating scales.
Specific aim 2:
Verify if cognitive, language and behavioral testing can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.
For point (1) the hypothesis is that cognitive, language and behavioral testing support early diagnosis and phenotyping in the earliest stages compared to PD and HC. For point (2) the hypothesis is that cognitive, language and behavioral testing are able to evaluate disease progression in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.
Specific aim 3:
Verify if single parameter and multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging assessments can (1) support early clinical diagnosis and phenotyping of PSP patients compared to PD and HC and (2) evaluate disease trajectories in the whole cohort of PSP patients and discrete phenotypes.
Experimental design aim 1 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).
During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will perform:1) a clinic-based standardized protocol for assessment of gait with wearable inertial sensors to specifically monitor quality of gait and balance using a wide range of measures from the upper and lower body (APDM Mobility Lab system) ;2) home-based monitoring with smartphone of inertial measurement (balance and gait task) and voice recorded with microphone for at least 5 days;3) standard clinical rating scales including the PSP rating scale, the Natural History and Neuroprotection in Parkinson Plus Syndromes, Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part III, Falls diary to be filled during the 5-day home based monitoring. Caregivers will be asked to actively support patients for the home- smartphone-based digital biomarkers measurements.
Furthermore, at baseline only PSP patients will be asked to perform lumbar puncture to collect CSF and measure total-tau, phosphorylated tau, Beta-amyloid 42, neurofilament light and heavy chain. A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients.
During both cross-sectional and longitudinal phases (every 3 months), only patients enrolled at Unit 1 will also perform a gait analysis assessment with a traditional opto-kinematic, hospital-based gait analysis system (Qualisys®, Sandvälen, Sweden).
Experimental design aim 2 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).
During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will perform:1) the RBANS; 2)standard cognitive assessment currently used by part of the research team to evaluate cognitive abilities in PSP patients as detailed elsewhere; 3) functional autonomy will be evaluated with the Instrumental Activities of Daily Life, while depression and apathy with the Beck Depression Inventory II and Apathy Evaluation Scale, respectively; 4) other neuropsychiatric symptoms will be explored with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory; 5) language abilities will be explored with the Screening for Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration (SAND) battery.
A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients.
Experimental design aim 3 includes a cross-sectional phase with enrollment of 3 groups of subjects (PSP, PD and HC).
During the baseline evaluation each enrolled subject will undergo a multimodal 3T MRI. The MRI protocol will include conventional sequences for morphometric measures (ie, the superior cerebellar peduncles, the middle cerebellar peduncles, the MR Parkinsonism index, the midbrain-pons area ratio; a 3D Spoiled Gradient Recalled Echo (SPGR) and a 3D-GRE multi-echo susceptibility weighted (SWAN) images to obtain quantitative susceptibility mapping and ROI based measures in substantia nigra, basal ganglia thalamus, red nucleus and fronto-parietal cortex, a resting state functional MRI and an Arterial Spin Labeling sequence.
A 12-month longitudinal phase will follow only for PSP patients. Both single parameter and multiparameter (morphometric, iron based, functional, and perfusion) MRI approaches will be applied to validate the usefulness of imaging assessments in predicting both early PSP diagnosis and phenotyping as well as disease progression.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
evaluation of movements with sensors
evaluation of movements with sensors
Group 2
Patients with Parkinson's disease
evaluation of movements with sensors
evaluation of movements with sensors
Group 3
Healthy controls
evaluation of movements with sensors
evaluation of movements with sensors
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
evaluation of movements with sensors
evaluation of movements with sensors
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ability to walk for at least 5 steps
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant MRI abnormalities as cerebrovascular diseases, tumors.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
OTHER
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
OTHER
University of Salerno
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marina Picillo
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AOU Padova
Padua, , Italy
AOU Pisa
Pisa, , Italy
AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona
Salerno, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Picillo M, Abate F, Ponticorvo S, Tepedino MF, Erro R, Frosini D, Del Prete E, Cecchi P, Cosottini M, Ceravolo R, Salle GD, Salle FD, Esposito F, Pellecchia MT, Manara R, Barone P. Association of MRI Measures With Disease Severity and Progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 12;11:603161. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603161. eCollection 2020.
Picillo M, Cuoco S, Carotenuto I, Abate F, Erro R, Volpe G, Pellecchia MT, Catricala E, Cappa S, Barone P. Clinical use of SAND battery to evaluate language in patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223621. eCollection 2019.
Picillo M, Tepedino MF, Abate F, Erro R, Ponticorvo S, Tartaglione S, Volpe G, Frosini D, Cecchi P, Cosottini M, Ceravolo R, Esposito F, Pellecchia MT, Barone P, Manara R. Midbrain MRI assessments in progressive supranuclear palsy subtypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;91(1):98-103. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321354. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
Picillo M, Cuoco S, Amboni M, Bonifacio FP, Bruschi F, Carotenuto I, De Micco R, De Rosa A, Del Prete E, Di Biasio F, Elifani F, Erro R, Fabbri M, Falla M, Franco G, Frosini D, Galantucci S, Lazzeri G, Magistrelli L, Malaguti MC, Milner AV, Minafra B, Olivola E, Pilotto A, Rascuna C, Rizzetti MC, Schirinzi T, Borroni B, Ceravolo R, Di Fonzo A, Marchese R, Mercuri NB, Modugno N, Nicoletti A, Padovani A, Santangelo G, Stefani A, Tessitore A, Volonte MA, Zangaglia R, Zappia M, Zibetti M, Barone P. Validation of the Italian version of the PSP Quality of Life questionnaire. Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec;40(12):2587-2594. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04010-2. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Picillo M, Cuoco S, Amboni M, Bonifacio FP, Bruno A, Bruschi F, Cappiello A, De Micco R, De Rosa A, Di Biasio F, Elifani F, Erro R, Fabbri M, Falla M, Franco G, Frosini D, Galantucci S, Lazzeri G, Magistrelli L, Malaguti MC, Milner AV, Minafra B, Olivola E, Pilotto A, Rascuna C, Rizzetti MC, Schirinzi T, Borroni B, Ceravolo R, Di Fonzo A, Lopiano L, Marchese R, Mercuri NB, Modugno N, Nicoletti A, Padovani A, Santangelo G, Stefani A, Tessitore A, Volonte MA, Zangaglia R, Zappia M, Barone P. Validation of the Italian version of carers' quality-of-life questionnaire for parkinsonism (PQoL Carer) in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurol Sci. 2019 Oct;40(10):2163-2169. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03944-x. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Picillo M, Cuoco S, Tepedino MF, Cappiello A, Volpe G, Erro R, Santangelo G, Pellecchia MT, Barone P; PSP Salerno study group. Motor, cognitive and behavioral differences in MDS PSP phenotypes. J Neurol. 2019 Jul;266(7):1727-1735. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09324-x. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Picillo M, Erro R, Cuoco S, Tepedino MF, Manara R, Pellecchia MT, Barone P; PSP Salerno Study Group. MDS PSP criteria in real-life clinical setting: Motor and cognitive characterization of subtypes. Mov Disord. 2018 Aug;33(8):1361-1365. doi: 10.1002/mds.27408. Epub 2018 Jul 8. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEMAND-2020-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.