Can Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel be an Alternative in Gingival Phenotype Modification?
NCT ID: NCT04690140
Last Updated: 2024-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-05
2020-07-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Comparison of Different Root Coverage Techniques Using the Anatomical Recession Area Approach
NCT06272006
Clinical Outcomes of Enamel Matrix Derivative and Connective Tissue Graft in Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT)
NCT06504329
Treatment of Gingival Recessions with Connective Tissue or Concentrated Growth Factor Membrane Using Tunnel Technique
NCT04561947
Effect of Modified Free Gingival Graft and Conventional Free Gingival Graft on Gingival Recession
NCT06737120
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
modified coronally advanced tunnel technique
Initial sulcular incisions and flap separation were then carried out with tunnel knives. Dissection was extended at least 8 mm apically to the mucogingival junction and the muscle attachments were removed with curettes so that the flap could be moved in a coronal direction without tension. Interdental papillae were undermined to prepare the bed for connective tissue graft placement. Connective tissue graft was then inserted under the tunnel at the sites of recession and retracted laterally by sutures towards each end of the tunnel. After connective tissue graft positioning, the flap was gently stretched coronally to obtain passive flap closure. The exposed connective tissue was covered by connecting the adjacent flap margins with additional sutures.
Modified coronally advanced tunnel technique
Connective tissue graft placed under the prepared tunnel
epithelialized free gingival graft
A partial-thickness flap was elevated (blade #15c) with horizontal incisions at the cemento-enamel junction level of the adjacent teeth. Then, two vertical incisions extending to the apical were made from two ends of the horizontal incision. The epithelium in the framed region was removed with a scalpel and the underlying connective tissue was exposed. To achieve the best vascularization from the recipient site, bed preparation was completed with a split-thickness horizontal incision that joins the vertical incisions in the apical region.
Epithelialized free gingival graft
The Epithelialized free gingival graft placed on the prepared bed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epithelialized free gingival graft
The Epithelialized free gingival graft placed on the prepared bed.
Modified coronally advanced tunnel technique
Connective tissue graft placed under the prepared tunnel
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* presence of at least two recession type-1 recessions at mandibular anterior teeth and at least one recession with recession depth ≥2 mm,
* aged between 18-60.
Exclusion Criteria
* tooth mobility, any surgical history or gingival enlargement in the area,
* smoking or alcohol use,
* uncontrolled systemic disease, pregnancy or use of drugs known to affect gingival conditions
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gencay Keceli
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hacettepe University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yilmaz BT, Comerdov E, Kutuk C, Nart J, Keceli HG. Modified coronally advanced tunnel versus epithelialized free gingival graft technique in gingival phenotype modification: a comparative randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6283-6293. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04580-0. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Phenotype Modification
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.