Comparing Different Sizes of Small-bore Chest Drains in Malignant Pleural Effusion
NCT ID: NCT04669223
Last Updated: 2025-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-01
2024-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pleurodesis in Small-bore Chest Tube
NCT07208409
The Effect of a Combined Drainage Strategy in Uniportal Upper Lung Lobectomy
NCT04461652
Effectiveness of Intercostal Tube Drainage Vs Pigtail Catheter Drainage Vs Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration in Management of Massive Malignant Pleural Effusion
NCT06964321
Standard Chest Tube Compared With a Small Catheter in Treating Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients With Cancer
NCT00042770
Comparing Valve-regulated Pleural Drainage to Traditional Closed Chest Tube Drainage
NCT06410716
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study design: Single-center, parallel group, single blinded, randomized controlled study Study site: Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital Target study participants: Subjects with symptomatic MPE requiring chest drainage
Method and analysis: This randomized controlled study to compare the efficacy of ultra-small bore chest drains (8 Fr) with standard small bore chest drain (14 French) as the reference. Primary outcome is drain success defined by nearly complete drainage of MPE on chest radiograph on day 5 of the drain. Other secondary outcomes include pain according to the visual analogue scale, dyspnea relief and complications during the procedure and post - chest drain insertion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Seldinger chest drain 14F
Patients with seldinger chest drain 14F inserted
Seldinger chest drain insertion
Different sizes of chest drain will be inserted with seldinger technique
Seldinger chest drain 8F
Patients with seldinger chest drain 8F inserted
Seldinger chest drain insertion
Different sizes of chest drain will be inserted with seldinger technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Seldinger chest drain insertion
Different sizes of chest drain will be inserted with seldinger technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The pleural effusion is at least moderate to massive and causes symptoms
* Ability to give informed written consent to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Bleeding tendency not readily correctable (platelet \< 100 x 10\^9, INR ≥1.5 after transfusion)
* Hydropneumothorax before drain insertion
* Moderate-heavy septations in the pleural effusion (defined as a collection with more than 4 septations visible at the maximally septated area)
* Clinical emergency that an urgent chest drain is required
* Allergy to local anesthesia agents
* Blindness
* History of pleurodesis on the same side of malignant pleural effusion requiring drainage
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lui Mei Sze
Associate Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mei Sze Macy Lui, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii61-76. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137026. No abstract available.
Rahman NM, Pepperell J, Rehal S, Saba T, Tang A, Ali N, West A, Hettiarachchi G, Mukherjee D, Samuel J, Bentley A, Dowson L, Miles J, Ryan CF, Yoneda KY, Chauhan A, Corcoran JP, Psallidas I, Wrightson JM, Hallifax R, Davies HE, Lee YC, Dobson M, Hedley EL, Seaton D, Russell N, Chapman M, McFadyen BM, Shaw RA, Davies RJ, Maskell NA, Nunn AJ, Miller RF. Effect of Opioids vs NSAIDs and Larger vs Smaller Chest Tube Size on Pain Control and Pleurodesis Efficacy Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The TIME1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Dec 22-29;314(24):2641-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16840.
Parulekar W, Di Primio G, Matzinger F, Dennie C, Bociek G. Use of small-bore vs large-bore chest tubes for treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):19-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.1.19.
Hallifax RJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest Drain Size: the Debate Continues. Curr Pulmonol Rep. 2017;6(1):26-29. doi: 10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Mishra EK, Corcoran JP, Hallifax RJ, Stradling J, Maskell NA, Rahman NM. Defining the minimal important difference for the visual analogue scale assessing dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusions. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123798. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UW 20-582
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.