Feasibility of Ambulatory Talc. Pleurodesis

NCT ID: NCT06682936

Last Updated: 2024-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-10

Study Completion Date

2025-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with malignant pleural disease often experience a significant symptom burden and a short life expectancy. The cornerstone of their treatment is relieving breathlessness by draining fluid from around the lungs and attempting to prevent further fluid build up. Inpatient chest drainage and talc pleurodesis remains the most successful method of stopping the fluid build up but this often requires an average hospital stay of four days. This can be an inappropriate length of time for this patient group. Our study would investigate whether this treatment could be provided on an outpatient, ambulatory basis and facilitate a greater quality of life.

The investigators would assess deliverability of the trial protocol and collect patient feedback to see if our patients consider it an acceptable and worthwhile intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eligible patients will be offered enrolment in the trial along with standard of care options.

Participants who agree to take part in the trial would be consented for chest drain, talc pleurodesis on an ambulatory pathway.

On day 1 a standard chest drain would be inserted in the morning and large volume fluid removal would commence using an underwater seal bottle- as per standard care. A chest x-ray would be undertaken to confirm drain position, as per standard care. The investigators would remove 1000mls of fluid (stopping earlier if not tolerated) and the clamp the drain for one hour. The investigators would then open the drain again and drain up to 500mls before again clamping for one hour. The investigators would repeat this process as frequently as possible until the end of the working day. The drain would then be connected to an ambulatory bag instead of the underwater seal bottle and left in the open position. The patient would then be sent home to return on day 2.

On day 2 the drain would be flushed, aspirated and the output assessed. If there is still fluid output the investigators would drain up to 500mls and close the drain for an hour and repeat. If there is no further output the investigators would undertake a chest x ray to ensure the effusion has resolved and the lung has fully inflated. If it has the investigators would proceed to talc slurry instillation (with 20mls 1% lidocaine as per standard practice) and clamp the drain for 2 hours. After this the investigators would open the drain again and drain up to 500mls and close the drain for an hour. The investigators would repeat this as required and again the patient would return home with an ambulatory bag left open.

If the effusion has resolved but the lung has not fully expanded due to underlying disease then the investigators would simply remove the chest drain as pleurodesis will not be possible.

On day 3 the drain would be flushed, aspirated and the output assessed. If there is still fluid output the investigators would drain up to 500mls and close the drain for an hour and repeat. If there is no further output the investigators would undertake a chest x ray to ensure the effusion has resolved and the lung has fully inflated. the investigators would then remove the drain and repeat the x-ray to confirm there have been no complications. the investigators would then consider the intervention complete and revert to standard care (open access follow up )

If there was still significant fluid output the investigators would repeatedly drain 500ml volumes of fluid and clamp the drain for an hour after each 500ml until dry.

The investigators would ask patients to complete a very brief questionnaire (visual analogue scale) on breathlessness and chest pain on day 1 - before intervention, 1 hour post drain insertion, at the end of the day and on day 2 and 3 on first encounter and at the end of the day. The investigators would also repeat the questionnaire on day 30 along with their satisfaction with the procedure and if participants would have preferred to have stayed in hospital for the procedure (and why)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Pleural Effusion Malignancy Palliative Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Feasibility of outpatient intervention
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

outpatient drain and talc pleurodesis

Patients enrolled to the trial will have a chest drain inserted and we will aim to drain to dryness and instill medical grade talc as described in the protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ambulatory chest drain and talc pleurodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a chest drain will be inserted, fluid drained and medical talc instilled on an ambulatory basis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ambulatory chest drain and talc pleurodesis

a chest drain will be inserted, fluid drained and medical talc instilled on an ambulatory basis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Malignant pleural effusion
* Life expectancy \>30 days
* WHO PS 1-2 (3 if due to dyspnoea)

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous failed pleurodesis (on affected side)
* Known non-expansile lung
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

David Rollins

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Rollins

Research governance manager - TVRA

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin Conroy, MBBS, FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital of North Tees

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Tees and Hartlepool NHS foundation trust

Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kevin Conroy, MBBS, FRCP

Role: CONTACT

01642624615

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kevin Conroy, MBBS, FRCP

Role: primary

01642624615

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS:330188

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.