Risk Factors That Contribute to the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm
NCT ID: NCT04655443
Last Updated: 2021-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
77 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-08-29
2021-02-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Atrial Electromechanical Interval and Pulse Wave Velocity in the Prediction of Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00818012
Resync-AF (Rate vs Rhythm Control in AF Patients With CRT-D)
NCT01233648
Rhythm Evaluation for AntiCoagulaTion With COntinuous Monitoring
NCT01706146
CArdioversion of Short Duration Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02112318
Reducing Atrial Pacing Rate to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sick Sinus Syndrome.
NCT02034526
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although atrial fibrillation is commonly diagnosed and continues to have increased incidence in the country, patients continue to be admitted to the hospital for worsening symptoms of chest pain, shortness of breath, and palpitations. Long-term complications of atrial fibrillation include cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular events, thromboembolic events, and death.
Many medications have been established to convert patients from atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm; however procedures of cardioversion and ablation have also proven to be effective. A study, the AFFIRM trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002 discussed the benefit of converting patients to sinus rhythm versus keeping patients in atrial fibrillation, however making sure their heart rates were well-controlled. This study did not demonstrate a significant difference in death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding in both treatment arms suggesting there is no benefit of converting patients from atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm. However, with increasing health costs occurring around the country, every effort should be made to help improve patient symptoms and avoid unnecessary hospitalizations. A study published in the Journal of American College of Cardiology in 2004, "Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) study," concluded that the quality of life was impaired in patients with atrial fibrillation. Another study published in 2012, "Economic Burden of Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Intervention," reported total costs of atrial fibrillation care in the United States to be estimated to be $6.65 billion per year.
Our study is designed to look at patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent electrical cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm and create a prediction model to identify specific risk factors, which may contribute to persistent atrial fibrillation.
Prediction models have been established in regards to maintaining sinus rhythm, including the Hatch Score, which examined risk factors of hypertension, history of TIA or stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure that predisposed patients to persistent atrial fibrillation. Another score established was the LADS score, which observed risk factors of left atrial diameter, age, history of stroke, and smoking status as predictors of persistent atrial fibrillation. The purpose of our study is to create a new prediction model using clinical and echocardiographic parameters to determine if these factors will predict persistent atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Transesophageal echocardiographic parameters include imaging of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and calculating the LAA ejection fraction (LAAEF) by 3D or biplane Simpson method (based on image quality), and using pulse-wave Doppler to calculate the LAA exit velocity and S/D ratio across the pulmonic vein. Transthoracic echocardiographic parameters include estimated pulmonary arterial pressure (PASP) using tricuspid regurgitation (TR) jet velocity, left atrial volume index (LAVi), left ventricular (LV) size, LV hypertrophy (LVH) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Patients will be scheduled for an electrocardiogram thirty days after their electrical cardioversion. Based on the electrocardiogram result, patients that maintained sinus rhythm will be assigned to "Control".
Standard Care
Standard cardiovascular care
Afib Group
Patients will be scheduled for an electrocardiogram thirty days after their electrical cardioversion. Based on the electrocardiogram result, patients that developed persistent atrial fibrillation will be assigned to "Afib".
Standard Care
Standard cardiovascular care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard Care
Standard cardiovascular care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented atrial fibrillation by electrocardiogram (ECG)
* Patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
* Patients with a baseline transthoracic echocardiography within 1 month prior to the cardioversion
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are found to have a LAA thrombus on TEE
* Patients who do not have a follow up ECG
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Danbury Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ira Galin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Danbury Hospital, Nuvance Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Danbury Hospital
Danbury, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):e199-267. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available.
Vlachos K, Letsas KP, Korantzopoulos P, Liu T, Georgopoulos S, Bakalakos A, Karamichalakis N, Xydonas S, Efremidis M, Sideris A. Prediction of atrial fibrillation development and progression: Current perspectives. World J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 26;8(3):267-76. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i3.267.
Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021328.
Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu BC, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 May;4(3):313-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.958165. Epub 2011 May 3.
Gilbert KA, Hogarth AJ, MacDonald W, Lewis NT, Tan LB, Tayebjee MH. Restoration of sinus rhythm results in early and late improvements in the functional reserve of the heart following direct current cardioversion of persistent AF: FRESH-AF. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 15;199:121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
Ecker V, Knoery C, Rushworth G, Rudd I, Ortner A, Begley D, Leslie SJ. A review of factors associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jun;41(6):862-870. doi: 10.1002/clc.22931. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Malik S, Hicks WJ, Schultz L, Penstone P, Gardner J, Katramados AM, Russman AN, Mitsias P, Silver B. Development of a scoring system for atrial fibrillation in acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: the LADS scoring system. J Neurol Sci. 2011 Feb 15;301(1-2):27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society; Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey JY, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann S, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm AJ, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Aug 15;48(4):854-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.009. No abstract available.
Akdemir B, Altekin RE, Kucuk M, Yanikoglu A, Karakas MS, Aktas A, Demir I, Ermis C. The significance of the left atrial volume index in cardioversion success and its relationship with recurrence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation subjected to electrical cardioversion: a study on diagnostic accuracy. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2013 Feb;13(1):18-25. doi: 10.5152/akd.2013.003. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
Antonielli E, Pizzuti A, Palinkas A, Tanga M, Gruber N, Michelassi C, Varga A, Bonzano A, Gandolfo N, Halmai L, Bassignana A, Imran MB, Delnevo F, Csanady M, Picano E. Clinical value of left atrial appendage flow for prediction of long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 May 1;39(9):1443-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01800-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-601
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.