Simple Knee Value, a Simple Score for Functional Assessment of the Knee

NCT ID: NCT04653272

Last Updated: 2023-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The pre- and post-operative functional assessment of patients' knees is of great interest for the practitioner, whether it is in his or her daily practice to determine the appropriate management of the patient, or to conduct clinical studies. The scores used are established in several languages to provide a uniformly accepted unit of measurement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pre- and post-operative functional assessment of patients' knees is of great interest for the practitioner, whether it is in his or her daily practice to determine the appropriate management of the patient, or to conduct clinical studies. The scores used are established in several languages to provide a uniformly accepted unit of measurement.

A large number of functional knee scores already exist. These include scores for Lysholm-Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), but these can be difficult to apply in practice. daily due to their length, which may be too time-consuming for the clinician when consultations for example.

Shoulder surgeons are familiar with the Simple Shoulder Value (SSV) score, which simply consists of asking the patient how much they value their shoulder on the day of the exam, compared to a normal shoulder in percentage terms. It has been shown to produce results that are close to Constant score or Rowe and American Shoulder Score and Elbow score Surgeons Score after shoulder surgery. It is, since its description, very much used in daily practice by shoulder surgeons because of its speed and simplicity of execution.

No such assessment exists to our knowledge for the knee. The validation of a score of this type for the knee joint would allow the use of a new practical tool for a better patient management while saving the practitioner and the patient money. time in consultation.

The investigators would like to propose a functional knee score similar to the ISS for the shoulder that would allow a self-assessment of the condition of a knee, compared to a normal knee in percentage terms.

The hypothesis is that the SKV (Simple Knee Value) is a valid score giving results of equivalent to the various scores already used in the functional assessment of the knee in the different pathological situations in adult and paediatric populations

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

* Patients aged 16 to 40 years with ACL anterior cruciate ligament rupture, meniscal injury, patella instability or dislocation (Young Adult group),
* Patients over 55 years of age with gonarthrosis ("Senior" adults group).

Questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be evaluated identically to routine care with reference tests (Lysholm-Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOSS) and, IKDC (Evaluation of knee ligament injuries). This is filled in without any external help. The questionnaire includes the Lysholm-Tegner (young adult group), IKDC and KOOS scores (young and senior adult groups).

Control

* a group of "young" (16 to 40 years old)
* "senior" (over 55 years old) adult controls
* Everybody free of knee pathology.

Questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be evaluated identically to routine care with reference tests (Lysholm-Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOSS) and, IKDC (Evaluation of knee ligament injuries). This is filled in without any external help. The questionnaire includes the Lysholm-Tegner (young adult group), IKDC and KOOS scores (young and senior adult groups).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Questionnaire

Patients will be evaluated identically to routine care with reference tests (Lysholm-Tegner, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOSS) and, IKDC (Evaluation of knee ligament injuries). This is filled in without any external help. The questionnaire includes the Lysholm-Tegner (young adult group), IKDC and KOOS scores (young and senior adult groups).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For the patients:

1. Patients aged 16 to 40 years with ligament rupture anterior cruciate ACL, meniscal lesion, instability or anterior patella dislocation ("young" adult group),
2. Patients over 55 years of age with gonarthrosis. ("Senior" adults group).

For the controls:

In order to test the discriminating qualities of the SKV score, a group young" (16 to 40 years old) and "senior" (16 to 40 years old) adult witnesses, and 55 years old) with no problems with one of their knees.

For all participants :

* Understanding French
* Having given its non-opposition and for minors having obtained the non-opposition of one of the holders of parental authority
* Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

For all participants :

* Memory disorders,
* Psychiatric disorders,
* Patient refusal to participate in the study,
* Patient under the protection of adults (guardianship, guardianship, safeguarding of justice),
* Pregnant and/or breastfeeding woman
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Toulouse

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Etienne CAVAIGNAC, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Etienne Cavaignac

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RC31/19/0350

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.