Early Versus Delayed Intubation of Patients With COVID-19
NCT ID: NCT04632043
Last Updated: 2024-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-18
2021-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We hypothesise that a randomized controlled trial comparing early intubation as opposed to delayed intubation among patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is feasible.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-invasive Ventilatory Support of Patients Affected by COVID-19
NCT04382235
Early CPAP in COVID-19 Patients With Respiratory Failure.
NCT04326075
Early Extubation for Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT04349332
Tracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients
NCT04909476
Short-term Physical Function Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients Admitted to ICU for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT04400461
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On the one hand, early initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (i.e. early endotracheal intubation) has been advocated as a means to reduce subsequent possible aerosolization of the virus, as would happen by alternate means of oxygenation/ventilation allowing air leaks. Also, early intubation may prevent the induction of self-inflicted lung injury in patients who breath spontaneously and have high respiratory drive and, therefore, large transpulmonary pressure swings. On the other hand, delaying intubation, by trying alternate means of oxygenation/ventilation, may mean that some of the patients may not be intubated at all and therefore will be protected from the adverse events of invasive mechanical ventilation (such as ventilator-induced lung injury, ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction). The latter strategy may also address the unavailability of enough ventilators to meet the increased demand of treating patients with COVID-19.
Given that no randomized controlled trials are currently available to guide clinical practice regarding optimal timing of intubation, we propose a single-center randomized controlled feasibility trial to compare early intubation versus delayed intubation among patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The aim is that we gain experience and produce pilot data, which could inform the design of a subsequent large multi-center clinical trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early intubation
Patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (defined as the need for non-rebreather mask or high flow nasal oxygen with setting FiO2 of at least 90% or non-invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain a SpO2 \>92%) for at least 48 hours will undergo intubation.
Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation
Delayed intubation
Patients with COVID-19 suffering from severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (defined as the need for non-rebreather mask or high flow nasal oxygen with setting FiO2 of at least 90% or non-invasive mechanical ventilation to maintain a SpO2 \>92%) for at least 48 hours will continue to receive non-rebreather mask, high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilation in an attempt to avoid intubation.
Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endotracheal intubation
Endotracheal intubation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* After cardiac arrest
* Chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure
* Hypercapnic respiratory failure
* No full code
* Lack of equipoise of the clinical team
* Lack of informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Evangelismos Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ilias Siempos
Pulmonologist, Intensivist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ilias Siempos, MD, DSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Evangelismos Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Evangelismos Hospital
Athens, Attica, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2329-2330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6825. No abstract available.
Fan E, Beitler JR, Brochard L, Calfee CS, Ferguson ND, Slutsky AS, Brodie D. COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: is a different approach to management warranted? Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):816-821. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30304-0. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LC, Schenck EJ, Chen R, Jabri A, Satlin MJ, Campion TR Jr, Nahid M, Ringel JB, Hoffman KL, Alshak MN, Li HA, Wehmeyer GT, Rajan M, Reshetnyak E, Hupert N, Horn EM, Martinez FJ, Gulick RM, Safford MM. Clinical Characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 11;382(24):2372-2374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2010419. Epub 2020 Apr 17. No abstract available.
Bauer PR, Gajic O, Nanchal R, Kashyap R, Martin-Loeches I, Sakr Y, Jakob SM, Francois B, Wittebole X, Wunderink RG, Vincent JL; ICON Investigators (Supplemental Appendix 1). Association between timing of intubation and outcome in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of the ICON audit. J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
Kang BJ, Koh Y, Lim CM, Huh JW, Baek S, Han M, Seo HS, Suh HJ, Seo GJ, Kim EY, Hong SB. Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):623-32. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3693-5. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
32635, 13-10-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.