Evaluating the Shared Decision Making Process Scale in Cancer Screening Decisions

NCT ID: NCT04601272

Last Updated: 2023-03-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-29

Study Completion Date

2021-06-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate the performance of the Shared Decision Making Process scale in a sample of patients who have received a decision aid about the decision to screen or not screen for breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, or lung cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a retrospective observational study that will examine the performance of the Shared Decision Making Process in a sample of patients who made a decision about cancer screening in the last 2 years. Patients from 4 hospitals who have received a patient decision aid for breast, colon, prostate, or lung cancer screening will be screened for eligibility. A random sample of eligible patients will be sent a one-time survey. The survey asks patients about their experiences talking with healthcare providers about the specific cancer screening decision. The survey includes the Shared Decision Making Process scale, knowledge, preferences, decisional conflict and decision regret. The study will obtain 400 completed surveys, or 100 for each cancer topic.

The sample consists of patients who received a decision aid for cancer screening within the last two years and meet specific qualifications.

All analyses will be conducted separately for each group, and results may be pooled. First, study staff examine the descriptives for the Shared Decision Making Process items. Study staff will also test several hypotheses to examine performance of the scores such as whether higher shared decision making process scores are associated with less decisional conflict and less regret.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Screening Colon Cancer Screening Prostate Cancer Screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Breast Cancer Screening

Women between the ages of 35-55 when they received a decision aid for breast cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of breast cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to breast cancer screening.

Decision aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.

Colon Cancer Screening

Men and women between the ages of 45-75 when they received a decision aid for colon cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of colon cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to colon cancer screening.

Decision aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.

Prostate Cancer Screening

Men between the ages of 45-74 when they received a decision aid for prostate cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of prostate cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to prostate cancer screening.

Decision aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decision aid

Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Breast Cancer group

* Female sex
* Between ages of 35-55
* No previous diagnosis of breast cancer

Colon Cancer Group

* Between ages of 45-75
* No previous diagnosis of colon cancer

Prostate Cancer Group

* Male sex
* Between ages of 45-74
* No previous diagnosis of prostate cancer

Lung Cancer Group

* Between ages of 50-80
* No previous diagnosis of lung cancer

Exclusion Criteria

Breast Cancer group

* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of breast cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves

Colon Cancer Group

* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of colon cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves

Prostate Cancer Group

* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of prostate cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves

Lung Cancer Group

* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of lung cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karen Sepucha

Director, Health Decision Sciences Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen R Sepucha, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005P002282

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Second Opinions in Oncology
NCT05102500 COMPLETED
Improving Care After Chemotherapy
NCT01944137 COMPLETED NA