Evaluating the Shared Decision Making Process Scale in Cancer Screening Decisions
NCT ID: NCT04601272
Last Updated: 2023-03-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
240 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-29
2021-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Online Trial Examining Validity and Reliability of the Shared Decision Making Process Survey
NCT04317690
Cancer Patients Decision Making and Family Communication About Secondary Findings From Tumor Genomic Profiling
NCT02713334
Investigating Barriers for Decision Making in a Danish Breast Cancer Screening Context
NCT05444725
Promoting Informed Choice for Breast Cancer Screening
NCT05376241
Routine Evaluation of the Social Determinants of Health in Oncology: User-centered Resource Coordination and Engagement
NCT04879927
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sample consists of patients who received a decision aid for cancer screening within the last two years and meet specific qualifications.
All analyses will be conducted separately for each group, and results may be pooled. First, study staff examine the descriptives for the Shared Decision Making Process items. Study staff will also test several hypotheses to examine performance of the scores such as whether higher shared decision making process scores are associated with less decisional conflict and less regret.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Breast Cancer Screening
Women between the ages of 35-55 when they received a decision aid for breast cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of breast cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to breast cancer screening.
Decision aid
Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.
Colon Cancer Screening
Men and women between the ages of 45-75 when they received a decision aid for colon cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of colon cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to colon cancer screening.
Decision aid
Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.
Prostate Cancer Screening
Men between the ages of 45-74 when they received a decision aid for prostate cancer screening with no prior diagnosis of prostate cancer. These people will see items only pertaining to prostate cancer screening.
Decision aid
Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decision aid
Healthwise patient decision aids for breast, prostate, colon and lung cancer screening provide information on the pros and cons of cancer screening and guidance in process of selecting a choice.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Female sex
* Between ages of 35-55
* No previous diagnosis of breast cancer
Colon Cancer Group
* Between ages of 45-75
* No previous diagnosis of colon cancer
Prostate Cancer Group
* Male sex
* Between ages of 45-74
* No previous diagnosis of prostate cancer
Lung Cancer Group
* Between ages of 50-80
* No previous diagnosis of lung cancer
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of breast cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves
Colon Cancer Group
* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of colon cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves
Prostate Cancer Group
* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of prostate cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves
Lung Cancer Group
* Unable to confirm primary language is English
* History of lung cancer
* Severe cognitive impairment who cannot consent for themselves
35 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
FED
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karen Sepucha
Director, Health Decision Sciences Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen R Sepucha, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2005P002282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.