Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-11
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim.1: The primary outcome will be to evaluate the impact of the SDM intervention on the percentage of patients perceiving shared or greater role in decision-making.
Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of the SDM intervention on provider outcomes including the percentage of providers perceiving SDM with the patient, number of treatment options offered to patients, the proportion of times that clinical trials are offered to patients, the use of NCCN guideline-based treatment, and self-report of treatment plan use.
Aim 3: Secondary fidelity and provider outcomes from audio recording will include whether providers elicit: any patient preferences during treatment planning, preferences related to physical side effects or efficacy, or preferences related to other aspects of the patient experience. We will also assess whether providers use the TP in the decision-making discussion and whether providers discuss or offer clinical trials to the patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metastatic Breast Cancer (Qualitative Study)
NCT03248258
Improving Cancer Outcomes Through Personalized Care Planning and Symptom Management.
NCT04772118
Improving Patient-Centered Communication in Breast Cancer Through Patient and Provider Interventions
NCT04549571
Shared Decision Making in Pain Management Planning in Patients With Cancer
NCT03304145
Efficacy Study of an Educational Program for Decision Support for Breast Cancer
NCT00473096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants will be compensated in the form of a $20 gift card at the time of consent. After the patient provides consent, the research coordinator will evaluate the electronic medical record (EMR) for completion of standard of care elements necessary for the generation of TPs. At UAB, an embedded form with the necessary information for TP generation is completed in the EMR as part of standard of care by clinical providers. If this form has not been completed, the research coordinator may either notify the provider to initiate form completion or complete this form within the EMR to ensure availability at the time of the treatment decision. If the research coordinator completes this form, it will be reviewed by a clinical provider. The completion of the form prior to consent for patients approached by telephone will be necessary to allow new patients to receive TPs if a decision is made at their initial visit. For other sites who do not use EMR forms, the clinical information will be entered directly into the Carevive platform by either the research coordinators or clinical staff.
We will survey patients as described above on an iPad using the Carevive platform at baseline and every 6 months until a treatment decision is made (intervention or standard-of-care). Post-treatment surveys will be administered using a REDCap survey. To minimize participant burden, we will allow patients to complete surveys in-person during routine clinic visits, by telephone, or at home using an e-mailed link to the survey based on patient preference. To accommodate patients who would like to complete surveys in-person, we will allow for a 1-month window around the initial 6-month survey (for those without a treatment decision within 6 months) and a 2-week window around post-treatment survey. We will record if surveys are completed by email, telephone, or in-person.After each decision-making encounter, the physician will be asked to complete a patient-specific survey in REDCap. For standard of care patients, this will include the Control Preferences Scale. For intervention patients, the survey will include both the Control Preferences Scale and three study-specific questions about use of TP during decision-making.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Patients randomized to standard of care will receive their standard-of-care Carevive questionnaire used to generate TPs at time of enrollment and then every 6 months until a treatment decision is made.
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire
* Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive the intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire, which includes standard questions with additional decision-making questions. These surveys will be repeated every 6 months until the patient has received a TP.
* One month or at the next visit following the decision, the patient will be asked to complete a research survey using REDCap.
Intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire
includes standard of care questions with additional decision-making questions
Standard of Care Questionnaire
* Patients randomized to standard of care will receive the standard-of-care Carevive questionnaire used to generate TPs at time of enrollment and then every 6 months for patients with MBC who have not made a treatment decision until a treatment decision is made.
* One month or at the next visit following the decision, the patient will be asked to complete a post-treatment survey using REDCap.
Standard of Care questionnaire
includes the standard of care questions that are already in place for Carevive questionnaires
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire
includes standard of care questions with additional decision-making questions
Standard of Care questionnaire
includes the standard of care questions that are already in place for Carevive questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of breast cancer
* Receiving any line and type of therapy (including both standard of care and clinical trials)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are not being offered any medical therapy (hormone therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy) for their breast cancer
* Patients with a life-expectancy of less than 3 months
* Patients unable to provide informed consent
* Men
* Patients who do not plan to receive treatment at UAB or MCI
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Cancer Society, Inc.
OTHER
Carevive Systems, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gabrielle Rocque
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gabrielle B Rocque, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rocque GB, Eltoum N, Caston NE, Williams CP, Oliver MM, Moradi L, Ingram S, Azuero A, Pisu M, Bhatia S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Aug;206(3):483-493. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07304-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
427 BC SDM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.