Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03806738

Last Updated: 2023-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-11

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this trial is to conduct a two-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of SDM Treatment Plans (TPs) delivered at the time of decision-making compared to standard oncology care (delayed delivery of standard-of-care TPs) to determine impact on SDM. The intervention will be piloted in a RCT with 140 early stage breast cancer (EBC) and 140 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients to assess impact. Subjects will be enrolled across two sites. Our primary outcome will be the increase in percentage of patients reporting a perception of shared decision-making.

Aim.1: The primary outcome will be to evaluate the impact of the SDM intervention on the percentage of patients perceiving shared or greater role in decision-making.

Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of the SDM intervention on provider outcomes including the percentage of providers perceiving SDM with the patient, number of treatment options offered to patients, the proportion of times that clinical trials are offered to patients, the use of NCCN guideline-based treatment, and self-report of treatment plan use.

Aim 3: Secondary fidelity and provider outcomes from audio recording will include whether providers elicit: any patient preferences during treatment planning, preferences related to physical side effects or efficacy, or preferences related to other aspects of the patient experience. We will also assess whether providers use the TP in the decision-making discussion and whether providers discuss or offer clinical trials to the patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two sites (UAB and MCI) will conduct the RCT of 140 patients with MBC and 140 patients with EBC comparing use of SDM TPs delivered during decision-making visits compared to TPs delivered post-decision-making. The Carevive Care Planning System (CPS) treatment planning software will be used at all clinical sites to provide treatment care plans to patients with breast cancer. This software platform, which is currently utilized after decision-making, will be modified within this project to facilitate SDM through the creation of a SDM TP utilized during decision-making. Together, the patients and physician will be able to review the patient's decision-making style, patient's desire for prognostic information treatments, and patient preferences about decision-making.

Participants will be compensated in the form of a $20 gift card at the time of consent. After the patient provides consent, the research coordinator will evaluate the electronic medical record (EMR) for completion of standard of care elements necessary for the generation of TPs. At UAB, an embedded form with the necessary information for TP generation is completed in the EMR as part of standard of care by clinical providers. If this form has not been completed, the research coordinator may either notify the provider to initiate form completion or complete this form within the EMR to ensure availability at the time of the treatment decision. If the research coordinator completes this form, it will be reviewed by a clinical provider. The completion of the form prior to consent for patients approached by telephone will be necessary to allow new patients to receive TPs if a decision is made at their initial visit. For other sites who do not use EMR forms, the clinical information will be entered directly into the Carevive platform by either the research coordinators or clinical staff.

We will survey patients as described above on an iPad using the Carevive platform at baseline and every 6 months until a treatment decision is made (intervention or standard-of-care). Post-treatment surveys will be administered using a REDCap survey. To minimize participant burden, we will allow patients to complete surveys in-person during routine clinic visits, by telephone, or at home using an e-mailed link to the survey based on patient preference. To accommodate patients who would like to complete surveys in-person, we will allow for a 1-month window around the initial 6-month survey (for those without a treatment decision within 6 months) and a 2-week window around post-treatment survey. We will record if surveys are completed by email, telephone, or in-person.After each decision-making encounter, the physician will be asked to complete a patient-specific survey in REDCap. For standard of care patients, this will include the Control Preferences Scale. For intervention patients, the survey will include both the Control Preferences Scale and three study-specific questions about use of TP during decision-making.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shared Decision Making

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive the intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire, which includes standard questions with additional decision-making questions. These surveys will be repeated every 6 months until the patient has received a TP.

Patients randomized to standard of care will receive their standard-of-care Carevive questionnaire used to generate TPs at time of enrollment and then every 6 months until a treatment decision is made.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shared Decision Making Questionnaire

* Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive the intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire, which includes standard questions with additional decision-making questions. These surveys will be repeated every 6 months until the patient has received a TP.
* One month or at the next visit following the decision, the patient will be asked to complete a research survey using REDCap.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

includes standard of care questions with additional decision-making questions

Standard of Care Questionnaire

* Patients randomized to standard of care will receive the standard-of-care Carevive questionnaire used to generate TPs at time of enrollment and then every 6 months for patients with MBC who have not made a treatment decision until a treatment decision is made.
* One month or at the next visit following the decision, the patient will be asked to complete a post-treatment survey using REDCap.

Group Type OTHER

Standard of Care questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

includes the standard of care questions that are already in place for Carevive questionnaires

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intervention-specific Carevive questionnaire

includes standard of care questions with additional decision-making questions

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard of Care questionnaire

includes the standard of care questions that are already in place for Carevive questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women age ≥ 18
* Presence of breast cancer
* Receiving any line and type of therapy (including both standard of care and clinical trials)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are not able to read and/or speak English
* Patients who are not being offered any medical therapy (hormone therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy) for their breast cancer
* Patients with a life-expectancy of less than 3 months
* Patients unable to provide informed consent
* Men
* Patients who do not plan to receive treatment at UAB or MCI
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Cancer Society, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carevive Systems, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gabrielle Rocque

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabrielle B Rocque, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rocque GB, Eltoum N, Caston NE, Williams CP, Oliver MM, Moradi L, Ingram S, Azuero A, Pisu M, Bhatia S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Aug;206(3):483-493. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07304-y. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38856885 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

427 BC SDM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.