Language Development in Cochlear Implant Children

NCT ID: NCT04595552

Last Updated: 2020-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this work is to assess language development in cochlear implanted children in Assiut university hospital and to assess the impact of some related factors (age of implantation, family motivation and education, age of hearing loss and the pre-implanted language therapy or pre-implanted hearing aid wearing) on this development.

Adoption of newborn hearing screening programs across the nations has resulted in early identification and confirmation of hearing losses in youngest and vulnerable populations. Early identification often results in early intervention using hearing technology assistance via hearing aids or cochlear implants, parental education programs, and speech-language therapy The major goal of intervention is to capitalize on providing sensory, motor, and interactive exchanges at the earliest stages of communication development as a means of reducing the deleterious effects of auditory deprivation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A cochlear implant is a device that stimulates the auditory nerve electrically to produce hearing percepts. It has an external component that receives incoming sound, processes it according to a predefined strategy, and transfers the signal across the skin. A small, implanted electronic device receives and decodes the transmitted signal and stimulates electrodes in the cochlea. The electrodes stimulate the auditory nerve directly, bypassing the hair cells that implement the first stage of auditory neural processing in normal ears. The extended use of multichannel cochlear implants in adults brought about the first major success, both scientific and commercial, of a neural sensory prosthesis that replaced a human sense with an electronic device Cochlear implants are now widely used in young deaf children and have shown tremendous promise in facilitating a variety of developmental outcomes. Specifically, improvements have been shown in oral language, speech perception and recognition, attention, and behavioral development.

Medical advances, as well as technological inventions such as digital hearing aids and cochlear implants, have made significant changes in the likelihood that a child with hearing loss will achieve adequate speech perception, intelligible speech and language competency, though none of these is yet guaranteed for all children . Despite these advances, it is probable that a child with hearing loss faces a significant delay in exposure to auditory stimulation, leading to delays in the normal course of oral language development through audition. Research findings suggest that children who received an implant even before 12 months had a one year expressive language delay . Others found variable degrees of delay with children who received implants before age 2 of years.Others found that lowering the age of implantation does seem to improve the prospects of normal language acquisition but the evidence does not suggest that children with cochlear implants perform like hearing peers on average .

Most children who are born profoundly deaf or who become deaf before the age of 3 years fall significantly behind their normal-hearing peers in their mastery of the surrounding oral language in its written, read, spoken, and signed forms.

One of the most important factors shown to influence the development of communication abilities in pediatric cochlear implant recipients is age at time of implantation .

Children implanted by 12 months of age demonstrate better language development compared with children who receive their cochlear implant between 13 and 24 months. This supports the provision of a cochlear implant within the first year of life to enhance the likelihood that a child with severe-to-profound hearing impairment will commence elementary school with age-appropriate language skills. The implanted prior to 3 years had significantly faster rates of language development than later-implanted children.

Two additional demographic factors that influence communication development in children with cochlear implants are communication mode and residual hearing. Children with prelingual deafness who use oral communication generally achieve significantly higher levels of speech perception, speech production, and/or language skills than their deaf peers who use total communication, that is, the combined use of signed and spoken language Speech perception performance with cochlear implants appears related to several factors. Higher speech perception appears linked to shorter periods of auditory deprivation, greater amounts of residual hearing, and younger ages of implantation Spoken language performance was related to the age the hearing loss was identified and the amount of typical hearing experience a child might have before losing their residual hearing

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Language Development

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

interventional prospective study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group

Children with cochlear implant were given Auditory training and language therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

language therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

auditory training and language therapy for 6 months up to 2 years in 2 session per week the duration of session 30 minuets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

language therapy

auditory training and language therapy for 6 months up to 2 years in 2 session per week the duration of session 30 minuets

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All these patients have satisfactory threshold of hearing post operatively proved by full post-operative audiological evaluation.

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdallah Metwally Abdelzaher

Principal invistegator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abdallah Abdelzaher, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medecine

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Levitt H, McGarr N, Geffner D. Development of language and communication skills in hearing-impaired children. Introduction. ASHA Monogr. 1987 Oct;(26):1-8. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3509663 (View on PubMed)

Moeller MP, Osberger MJ, Eccarius M. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Receptive language skills. ASHA Monogr. 1986 Mar;(23):41-53. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3730031 (View on PubMed)

Osberger MJ, Moeller MP, Eccarius M, Robbins AM, Johnson D. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students. Expressive language skills. ASHA Monogr. 1986 Mar;(23):54-65. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3730032 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Language in cochlear implant

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neural Prediction to Enhance Language
NCT05962359 RECRUITING NA
Technology-assisted Language Intervention (TALI)
NCT04857255 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Measuring Aided Language Development
NCT06512168 RECRUITING NA
Stuttering and Anxiety
NCT03160586 COMPLETED NA
Assessment of Children by Speech ABR
NCT06061458 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA