Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for Acute Decompensation of COPD
NCT ID: NCT04582799
Last Updated: 2025-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains \< 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange. Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis.
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, showed that: (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" \[8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively\]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in COPD Exacerbation
NCT01422681
Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation
NCT03692117
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Exacerbation of COPD Not Responding to Non-Invasive Ventilation
NCT04882410
Physiological Study of Minimally Invasive ECCO2R in Exacerbations of COPD Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT02586948
ECCO2R in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of COPD With Severe Hypercapnia
NCT04842344
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pathophysiological hallmarks of COPD patients include expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure. Under these circumstances, a prolonged expiratory time is the compensatory mechanism patients adopt to maintain a stable tidal breathing. COPD exacerbations result in higher respiratory rates and reduced expiratory time, leading to dynamic hyperinflation, elevated intrathoracic pressures, and excessive work of breathing. Alteration of the balance between (a) the decreased capacity of the respiratory muscles to generate pressure, and (b) the increased mechanical respiratory load due to expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure leads to CO2 retention. The consequent reduction of alveolar ventilation leads to a further worsening of CO2 retention and increased work of breathing. This vicious circle is the underlying mechanisms responsible of acute respiratory failure requiring admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ventilatory support.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains \< 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange.
Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) have been used in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure since ECCO2R may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis. Although available studies are limited to case series, several ECCO2R devices have been developed and proposed for the clinical use in patients with COPD. These systems often represent modifications of renal replacement therapy circuits, and are characterized by:
1. veno-venous by-pass systems
2. extracorporeal blood flow of 0.3-0.5 litres/min
3. 13 Fr bore catheters or a single co-axial catheter
4. very low doses or no heparin
5. minimal volumes for "priming"
This technological implementation of ECCO2-R is therefore closer to device for renal replacement therapy than full ECMO. CO2 is removed through a double-lumen catheter and constantly propelled, by a non-occlusive rotating pump, though an artificial membrane lung (a filter adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide) connected to a source of 100% O2 (flow 6-8 liters/min). These systems are able to reduce PaCO2 by 20-25%.
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, compared "NIV-plus-ECCO2R" and "NIV-only" in patients at risk of NIV failure, and showed that (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" \[8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively\]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients. A recent systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ECCO2R in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure across 12 studies and showed that the majority of patients were either successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation or sustained on NIV, avoiding intubation. However, this high success rates, was associated with a high frequency of potentially severe complications.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication
Objectives:
The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care. Event free survival is defined as survival at day 28 free of any of the followings: (a) development of sepsis; (b) occurrence of a second episode of COPD exacerbation requiring or not mechanical ventilation; (c) occurrence of severe hypoxemia; (d) prolonged mechanical ventilation (e) death.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care (NIV)
Patients in the control group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation only.
NIV
Non-invasive ventilation
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R)
Patients in the treatment group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation combined with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal.
ECCO2R
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal
NIV
Non-invasive ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ECCO2R
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal
NIV
Non-invasive ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Documented clinical history of COPD
* ICU admission for exacerbation of COPD requiring non-invasive ventilatory support After two hours of NIV at least two of the following criteria must be fulfilled
* arterial pH ≤ 7.25
* respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min
* use of accessory muscles or paradoxical abdominal movements
Exclusion Criteria
* ratio of arterial-to-inspired oxygen O2 fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 150 with FiO2 of less than 0.6 and PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O
* contraindications to anticoagulation (i.e. any of the following: platelet count \<50,000/mm3; prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) \>1.5; stroke or severe head trauma or intracranial arterio-venous malformation, or cerebral aneurysm, or central nervous system mass lesion within the previous 3 months; epidural catheter in place or expected to be positioned during the study; history of congenital bleeding diatheses; gastrointestinal bleeding within the 6 weeks prior to study entry; esophageal varices, chronic jaundice, cirrhosis, or chronic ascites; trauma);
* heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
* body weight \>120 Kg;
* contraindication to continuation of active treatment;
* failure to obtain consent
* catheter access to femoral vein or jugular vein impossible
* pneumothorax
* inclusion in other trials
* patient moribund
* severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh scores \> 7) or fulminant hepatic failure
* diagnosed with acute or chronic neuromuscular disease
* required chronic mechanical ventilation prior to hospital admission
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Milan
OTHER
University of Turin, Italy
OTHER
University of Roma La Sapienza
OTHER
University of Bologna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
V. Marco Ranieri
Full Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
V. Marco Ranieri, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Bologna
Stefano Nava, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Bologna
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tonetti T, Pisani L, Cavalli I, Vega ML, Maietti E, Filippini C, Nava S, Ranieri VM. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for treatment of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ORION): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05692-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ORION
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.