Extracorporeal CO2 Removal With the Hemolung RAS for Mechanical Ventilation Avoidance During Acute Exacerbation of COPD
NCT ID: NCT03255057
Last Updated: 2022-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
113 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-18
2022-08-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physiological Study of Minimally Invasive ECCO2R in Exacerbations of COPD Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT02586948
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in Acute Exacerbation of COPD Not Responding to Non-Invasive Ventilation
NCT04882410
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for Acute Decompensation of COPD
NCT04582799
Effects of High Flow Nasal Cannula on Sputum Clearance in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT04217746
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal in COPD Exacerbation
NCT01422681
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemolung plus SOC IMV
Low-flow ECCO2R with the Hemolung Respiratory Assist System as an alternative or adjunct to standard-of-care (SOC) invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)
Hemolung Respiratory Assist System
Treatment with a medical device called the Hemolung RAS. The Hemolung RAS includes three components: the Hemolung Controller, the Hemolung Cartridge, and the Hemolung Catheter. The intervention is use of the Hemolung RAS to provide partial lung support for acute hypercapnic lung failure by filtering carbon dioxide from venous blood using a central venous catheter through which venous blood is pumped at flows of 350-550 milliliters per minute to and from an external circuit containing a hollow fiber membrane blood gas exchanger (with heparin-coated fibers) integrated with a centrifugal pump.
Invasive mechanical ventilation
Lung support for acute lung failure applied with a mechanical ventilation device that uses positive pressure to mechanically inflate the lungs and facilitate exhalation via an endotracheal tube or tracheotomy.
SOC IMV
Standard-of-care (SOC) invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone
Invasive mechanical ventilation
Lung support for acute lung failure applied with a mechanical ventilation device that uses positive pressure to mechanically inflate the lungs and facilitate exhalation via an endotracheal tube or tracheotomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hemolung Respiratory Assist System
Treatment with a medical device called the Hemolung RAS. The Hemolung RAS includes three components: the Hemolung Controller, the Hemolung Cartridge, and the Hemolung Catheter. The intervention is use of the Hemolung RAS to provide partial lung support for acute hypercapnic lung failure by filtering carbon dioxide from venous blood using a central venous catheter through which venous blood is pumped at flows of 350-550 milliliters per minute to and from an external circuit containing a hollow fiber membrane blood gas exchanger (with heparin-coated fibers) integrated with a centrifugal pump.
Invasive mechanical ventilation
Lung support for acute lung failure applied with a mechanical ventilation device that uses positive pressure to mechanically inflate the lungs and facilitate exhalation via an endotracheal tube or tracheotomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Confirmed diagnosis of underlying COPD or ACOS (Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome)
3. Experiencing acute hypercapnic respiratory failure
4. Informed consent from patient or legally authorized representative
5. Meets one of the three following criteria:
1. Is at high risk of requiring intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) after at least one hour on NIV due to one or more of the following:
* Respiratory acidosis (arterial pH \<= 7.25) despite NIV
* Worsening hypercapnia or respiratory acidosis relative to baseline blood gases
* No improvement in PaCO2 relative to baseline blood gases and presence of moderate or severe dyspnea
* Presence of tachypnea \> 30 breaths per minute
* Intolerance of NIV with failure to improve or worsening acidosis, dyspnea or work of breathing
\*OR\*
2. After starting NIV with a baseline arterial pH ≤ 7.25, shows signs of progressive clinical decompensation manifested by decreased mental capacity, inability to tolerate NIV, or increased or decreased respiratory rate in setting of worsened or unchanged acidosis.
\*OR\*
3. Currently intubated and receiving Invasive MV, meeting both of the following:
* Intubated for ≤ 5 days (from intubation to time of consent), AND
* Has failed a spontaneous breathing trial OR is deemed not suitable for a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) OR is deemed not suitable for extubation
Exclusion Criteria
2. Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg) despite infusion of vasoactive drugs
3. Acute coronary syndrome
4. Current presence of severe pulmonary edema due to Congestive Heart Failure
5. PaO2/FiO2 \< 120 mmHg on PEEP \>/= 5 cmH2O
6. Presence of bleeding diathesis or other contraindication to anticoagulation therapy
7. Platelet count \>= 100,000/mm3 not requiring daily transfusions to maintain platelet count above 100,000/mm3 at time of screening
8. Hemoglobin \>= 7.0 gm% not requiring daily transfusions to maintain hemoglobin count above 7.0 gm% at time of screening, and no active major bleeding
9. Unable to protect airway (e.g. unable to generate cough or clear secretions) or significant weakness or paralysis of respiratory muscles due to causes unrelated to acute exacerbation of COPD
10. Cerebrovascular accident, intracranial bleed, head injury or other neurological disorder likely to adversely affect ventilation or airway protection.
11. Hypersensitivity to heparin or history of previous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT Type II)
12. Presence of a significant pneumothorax or bronchopleural fistula
13. Current uncontrolled, major psychiatric disorder
14. Current participation in any other interventional clinical study
15. Pregnant women (women of child bearing potential require a pregnancy test)
16. Neutropenic (absolute neutrophil count \< 1,00mm3, not transient) related to the presence or treatment of a malignancy; recent bone marrow transplant (within prior 8 months); current, uncontrolled AIDS.
17. Fulminant liver failure
18. Known vascular abnormality or condition which could complicate or prevent successful Hemolung Catheter insertion
19. Terminal patients not expected to survive current hospitalization
20. Requiring continuous home ventilation via a tracheostomyy
21. Any disease or condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, either places the subject at undue risk of complications from the Hemolung RAS device, or may reduce the subject's likelihood of benefitting from therapy with the Hemolung RASr
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alung Technologies
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicholas Hill, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tufts University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC Davis Medical Group
Sacramento, California, United States
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, United States
University of Florida - Health Shands
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
WellStar Kennestone Regional Medical Center
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Lexington VA Healthcare
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
LSU Health Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Spectrum Health Hospitals
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis Heart
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, United States
Northwell Health
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Lehigh Valley Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Hospital of University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
UT Erlanger
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Memphis VA Medical Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
UT McGovern Medical School Memorial Hermann
Houston, Texas, United States
Baylor Scott and White Memorial Hospital
Temple, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Inova Health Care Services
Falls Church, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burki NK, Mani RK, Herth FJF, Schmidt W, Teschler H, Bonin F, Becker H, Randerath WJ, Stieglitz S, Hagmeyer L, Priegnitz C, Pfeifer M, Blaas SH, Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Quintel M, Moerer O. A novel extracorporeal CO(2) removal system: results of a pilot study of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):678-686. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0228.
Duggal A, Conrad SA, Barrett NA, Saad M, Cheema T, Pannu S, Romero RS, Brochard L, Nava S, Ranieri VM, May A, Brodie D, Hill NS; VENT-AVOID Investigators. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal to Avoid Invasive Ventilation During Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: VENT-AVOID Trial - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):529-542. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2060OC.
Stokes JW, Gannon WD, Rice TW. Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal or Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Why Should We Care? Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):e546-e547. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004844. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HL-CA-5000
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.