Benefits of Lightweight Ambulatory Oxygen Systems for Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

NCT ID: NCT00325754

Last Updated: 2019-11-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-03-31

Study Completion Date

2006-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects over 14 million people in the United States. It is the fourth leading cause of death and the only leading cause of death for which mortality rates are rising. Medical science has developed few effective therapies for COPD. In patients with advanced COPD and chronic hypoxemia, long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been shown to be uniquely beneficial. It is the only available non-surgical therapy demonstrated to prolong survival in these patients. This study will compare the clinical and physiologic benefits of two different oxygen therapy devices among hypoxemic individuals with COPD: a lightweight ambulatory oxygen device versus the standard portable E-cylinder device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Individuals with COPD who experience hypoxemia (reduction of oxygen concentration in arterial blood) have an especially poor prognosis. Provision of LTOT to hypoxemic COPD patients is considered to be the standard of care. The majority of hypoxemic patients that are ambulatory are supplied with pressurized oxygen in E-cylinders. This system weighs approximately 22 pounds, is mounted on a wheeled cart, and is towed by the patient. These cumbersome systems can be seen to impose a significant burden on weak and debilitated patients, discouraging them from being active. E-cylinders towed on a cart are referred to as 'portable', in contrast to lightweight 'ambulatory' oxygen systems, which weigh less than 10 pounds and are designed to be carried by the patient. It is unknown whether patients provided with lightweight ambulatory systems comply better with oxygen prescription and increase their daily level of activity. This study will compare the use and benefits of a lightweight ambulatory oxygen device versus the standard portable E-cylinder device among hypoxemic individuals with COPD. Specifically, the study will examine daily duration of oxygen therapy and activity levels amongst both groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E-Cylinder

22-lb E-cylinder towed on a cart

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

E-Cylinder

Intervention Type DEVICE

Portable Oxygen Therapy Delivered Via An E-Cylinder Mounted On A Wheeled Cart

Lightweight Cylinder

3.6-lb lightweight cylinder that can be carried

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lightweight Cylinder

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ambulatory Oxygen Therapy Delivered Via A Carbon-Wrapped Aluminum Cylinder

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

E-Cylinder

Portable Oxygen Therapy Delivered Via An E-Cylinder Mounted On A Wheeled Cart

Intervention Type DEVICE

Lightweight Cylinder

Ambulatory Oxygen Therapy Delivered Via A Carbon-Wrapped Aluminum Cylinder

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Currently in a stable phase of COPD, defined as having had no disease exacerbation within the 4 weeks prior to study entry
* Ambulatory
* Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) less than or equal to 60% of predicted value at screening
* Ratio of FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) less than or equal to 65% of predicted value at screening
* Currently receiving long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)
* Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) less than 60 torr

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, left-sided heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, exertional angina, complex arrhythmias, severe dependent edema, ischemic changes on stress electrocardiogram that would be contraindications for unrestricted ambulation or the 6-minute walk test)
* Orthopedic impairments that would limit ambulation
* Participation in the active phase of pulmonary rehabilitation within the 3 months prior to study entry
* Neurologic impairments (e.g., Parkinson's disease or a stroke) or mental states (e.g., senile dementia) that would limit independent ambulation
* Neoplastic disease that is anticipated to influence survival
* Currently receiving lightweight ambulatory oxygen therapy
* Inability to maintain an oxygen saturation of 92% at rest with 4 liter/minute of continuous oxygen flow and during exercise with an oxygen conserver setting of 6 utilizing a nasal cannula
* Currently a smoker
* Sleep apnea if it is characterized primarily as central sleep apnea syndrome (whether being treated or not) OR if it is known or suspected obstructive sleep apnea that has existed for at least 2 months and has not received stable treatment (stable treatment modes include positive airway pressure therapies or dental orthotic/mandibular positioning devices); individuals with diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea must have a body mass index less than or equal to 30 kg/m2 to be eligible for this study
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Clinical Research Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard K. Albert

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Denver City-County Health/Hospitals Department

William Bailey

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Richard Casaburi

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Harbor-UCLA Research & Education Institution

John Connett

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Gerard J. Criner

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Temple University

Stephen C. Lazarus

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univeristy of California at San Francisco

Fernando J. Martinez

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Dennis E. Niewoehner

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Minnesota Veterans Medical Research and Education Foundation

John J. Reilly

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Steven M. Scharf

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Maryland, College Park

Frank Sciurba

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of California at San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Harbor-UCLA Research & Education Institution

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Denver City-County Health/Hospitals Department

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minnesota Veterans Research Institute

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Temple University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hecht A, Ma S, Porszasz J, Casaburi R; COPD Clinical Research Network. Methodology for using long-term accelerometry monitoring to describe daily activity patterns in COPD. COPD. 2009 Apr;6(2):121-9. doi: 10.1080/15412550902755044.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19378225 (View on PubMed)

Casaburi R, Porszasz J, Hecht A, Tiep B, Albert RK, Anthonisen NR, Bailey WC, Connett JE, Cooper JA Jr, Criner GJ, Curtis J, Dransfield M, Lazarus SC, Make B, Martinez FJ, McEvoy C, Niewoehner DE, Reilly JJ, Scanlon P, Scharf SM, Sciurba FC, Woodruff P; COPD Clinical Research Network. Influence of lightweight ambulatory oxygen on oxygen use and activity patterns of COPD patients receiving long-term oxygen therapy. COPD. 2012 Feb;9(1):3-11. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.630048.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22292592 (View on PubMed)

Kunisaki KM, Niewoehner DE, Connett JE; COPD Clinical Research Network. Vitamin D levels and risk of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 1;185(3):286-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201109-1644OC. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22077070 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U10HL074424

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

0405S60010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00119860

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.