Oxygen Portable Concentrator During Exercises in Patients With COPD

NCT ID: NCT00875719

Last Updated: 2011-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare differences in oxygen delivery between portable oxygen concentrators (POCs) and liquid oxygen (LOs) portable units, pose a question if POCs are equally effective as LOs in reducing exercise-induced hypoxaemia. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our primary objective is to compare at rest and during exercise the evolution of oxygen saturation and dyspnea during 6 minutes walking test in patients with COPD receiving oxygen supplementation either with portable concentrators or liquid oxygen in a random order.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

continuous v intermittent Oxygen therapy

intermittent oxygen compared to constant flow oxygen as regards walking distance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxygen concentrators versus constant flow axygen

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each patient performed 2 walking tests, and received oxygen supplementation from a portable concentrator or a liquid oxygen source, in a random order.

oxygen concentrator

Intervention Type DEVICE

comparison walk distance and saturation with continuous oxygen compared to intermittent oxygen

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oxygen concentrators versus constant flow axygen

Each patient performed 2 walking tests, and received oxygen supplementation from a portable concentrator or a liquid oxygen source, in a random order.

Intervention Type DEVICE

oxygen concentrator

comparison walk distance and saturation with continuous oxygen compared to intermittent oxygen

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

portable oxygen concentrator portable concentrator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* COPD with respiratory failure and indication for oxygen supplementation at rest and/or during exercice.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evolutive heart disease.
* Unability to understand or realize the tests.
* Acute exacerbation during the last month.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ANTADIR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Boris MELLONI, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Pneumologie et Allergologie- Hôpital le Cluzeau. 23 av. D. Larrey

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANTADIR CMTS OXYGEN 2009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.