Effects of Supplemental Oxygen Delivered by a Portable Oxygen Concentrator Compared to a Liquid Oxygen Device in COPD

NCT ID: NCT03174210

Last Updated: 2018-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-02

Study Completion Date

2017-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of supplemental oxygen on blood oxygenation at rest in Patients with severe to very severe COPD comparing the portable oxygen concentrator (Activox™ 4L) to a liquid continuous oxygen device (Companion®).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It has been proven that supplemental oxygen increases oxygen saturation and reduces dyspnea in hypoxemic COPD Patients. There are different oxygen delivery systems available, some of them operating with liquid oxygen and others by concentrating the ambient air (concentrators). An advantage of the concentrator system is, that there is no refill required, but only a power plug and plug socket, enabling the patient for higher mobility and to be more autonomous. There are only few publications about whether portable oxygen concentrators have a comparable efficiency on oxygen saturation to liquid oxygen devices with continuous flow (LOD) or not. Until now there are no official recommendations about how to convert the oxygen flow rate for LOD (liter per minute) into the corresponding level of the POC.

Therefore, we investigate the comparability of the portable oxygen concentrator Activox™ 4L (POC) to a liquid oxygen device (Companion®) in 30 hypoxemic COPD patients at rest.

As a baseline assessment, the patients will receive a bodyplethysmography, blood gas analysis without using supplemental oxygen and an evaluation of the diffusion capacity of the lung for CO.

The study will be conducted on 2 consecutive days. 15 patients will be randomized into two different groups: First group will start with POC and will continue the following day with LOD; The second group will start with LOD and continue with POC (cross-over design). All patients will use the same oxygen devices during the study assessments (LOD: Companion 1000 (CE 0050), Chart Industries Inc., Garfiel Heights, OH, USA; POC: Activox™ 4L, Inovalabs Inc., Texas, USA). On both days of the study, patients will be connected to one of the two systems via nasal cannula for a total time period of 40 minutes, while the patient remains in a sitting position without talking. The oxygen flow rate starts at 1liter/min (LOD) or Level 1 (POC) and will be increased every 10 minutes to the next higher level until the maximum of 4l/min (LOD) or level 4 (POC) is reached. Blood gases were taken and breathing frequency will be recorded at the end of each Oxygen Level.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

patients will be randomized into two different Groups (prospective cross-over design)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPD patients with delivery order 1, 2

Patients will use two different Oxygen devices at rest (1.liquid oxygen device (Companion R), 2. portable Oxygen concentrator (Activox TM 4L))

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

liquid oxygen device (LOD)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

portable oxygen concentrator (POC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

COPD patients with delivery order 2,1

Patients will use two different Oxygen devices at rest (1. portable Oxygen concentrator (Activox TM 4L), 2. liquid oxygen device (Companion R))

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

liquid oxygen device (LOD)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

portable oxygen concentrator (POC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

liquid oxygen device (LOD)

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

Intervention Type DEVICE

portable oxygen concentrator (POC)

This oxygen Supplementation is used in special order

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Companion 1000 Chart Industries, Inc. Garfield Heights, USA Activox™ 4L, Inovalabs Inc., Texas, USA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* COPD patients with hypoxemia at rest (paO2 \< 55 or 60 mmHg, according to the recent supplemental oxygen guidelines \[Hadringe, M., et al., British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults. Thorax, 2015. 70 Suppl 1: p. i1-43.\]
* Participation in an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (Schön Klinik BGL)
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* The Need of more than 4 Liter/min Oxygen at rest to achieve PaO2 \> 55 or 60mmHg
* Signs of acute exacerbation
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Klaus Kenn

Prof. Dr. Klaus Kenn

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Klaus Kenn, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Schoen Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schoen Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

Schönau am Königssee, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ActivoxTitration

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.