Ghost Ileostomy (GI) Versus Loop Ileostomy (LI) After Colorectal Resections

NCT ID: NCT04573075

Last Updated: 2024-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

257 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-31

Study Completion Date

2022-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A Ghost Ileostomy (GI) as an alternative to a diverting protective Loop Ileostomy (LI) after colorectal resection is offered the patients at risk preoperatively. A GI is only applied in cases, who would receive a LI otherwise.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A protective loop ileostomy (LI) is applied to protect a critical anastomosis after left sided colorectal resections. It is routinely indicated after low anterior rectal resection because this location carries a high risk for anastomotic insufficiency due to poor blood supply and tension of the bowel itself. A LI is also used to protect a primary anastomosis after other colorectal resections, if the surgeon in charge deems it necessary. However, the LI does not reduce the rate of insufficiencies (between 8-18%), but decreases the rate and severity of the associated complications and its mortality.

Furthermore, the LI is associated with complications of its own. Stoma malfunction due to torsion may cause a bowel obstruction, local complications may lead to an abscess or wound dehiscence, and in the long term follow-up surgical interventions due to hernias at the stoma site or adhesions with a consecutive ileus may become necessary.

Additionally, many patients are traumatized by the thought of a stoma. Thus, the routine application of a LI is currently critically discussed and its need re-evaluated.

A Ghost ileostomy (GI) is an alternative. Instead of a real diverting stoma the suitable small bowel loop is marked with a silicon strap, which is externalized through the abdominal wall and fixed with sutures. No real stoma outlet needs to be formed. In case of an anastomotic leakage (AL) the GI is easily converted to a LI by extracting the marked bowel loop through the abdominal wall. Besides increasing patients' comfort, ileostomy-related morbidity, hospital re-admissions for the closure of the ileostomy, and health care expenses related to the stoma supply and complications can be avoided.

In a recent systematic review of the existing literature Baloyiannis et al. identified 11 studies with altogether 554 patients. They found a total complication rate of 13.9%, with 2,1% GI-specific adverse events. Although it is a safe and comfortable option for low- and medium-risk patients it is still not established routinely.

Aim of the study:

The study wants to examen whether the routine use of a GI after colorectal resection with primary anastomosis can reduce the number of LI needed. This should avoid the stoma associated complications and the re-hospitalization for the stoma closure. A further endpoint is the routine use of GI as an alternative has to ensure patients safety. No further risk should result from this new intervention.

Study design:

Prospective clinical observational study

Method:

All patients after a colorectal resection with a primary anastomosis are offered the option of a GI as an alternative to a LI preoperatively. They have to consent in a stoma, if the surgeon in charge deems this necessary during the procedure. Written informed consent is obtained prior to surgery. At the end of the colorectal resection the surgeon in charge decided whether to shape a GI, a LI or no outlet. General criteria for a stoma are a redo anastomosis, an ultralow rectal resection, peritonitis at the site of the anastomosis, or an extended endometriosis resection in the pelvis. In case of emergency surgery a Hartman procedure may become necessary due to the critical condition of the patient. A GI is only applied in cases, who would have received a LI otherwise.

Technically, a silicon loop (Roeser Loops super maxi, Ref No 10.11522; Roeser Medical GmbH, Bochum, Germany; conformity european (CE) 0481) marks a suitable terminal ileum loop and is externalized through the 5 m trocar site regularly placed in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen or a similar mini-incision in cases of open surgery. The loop is fixed with two penetrating, non-absorbable sutures and closed with a wound dressing.

Postoperatively patients are observed on the intensive care unit (ICU) for 12-48 hours. Further action - ultrasound, CT scan, and/or colonoscopy - is taken in cases of fever, laboratory signs of inflammation (leucocyte count \>15x1000ul, procalcitonin \>1 ng/ml, or C-reactive protein more than three times the initial value). Pelvic fluid collection, bowel malfunction, or signs of anastomotic leakage will lead to a re-operation converting the GI to a LI and an abdominal lavage with drainage, if necessary. In all other cases of GI the silicon strap will be removed after the initiation of bowel function.

All patients included will be asked about their well being and medical treatments related to their colorectal resection after their dismission in a follow-up phone call 6 months after surgery. The study ends with this last survey.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Ghost ileostomy (short: ghost stoma) as an alternative to protective loop ileostomy or no outlet after colorectal resection
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

no outlet

no outlet is used after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

Group Type OTHER

no outlet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no further intervention is used after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

loop ileostomy

loop ileostomy is applied after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

loop ileostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a protective loop ileostomy is applied after after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

ghost ileostomy

ghost ileostomy or ghost stoma (synonyms) is performed after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ghost ileostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a loop of the small bowel is marked with a silicone strap and externalized through the abdominal wall to avoid a loop ileostomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ghost ileostomy

a loop of the small bowel is marked with a silicone strap and externalized through the abdominal wall to avoid a loop ileostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

loop ileostomy

a protective loop ileostomy is applied after after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no outlet

no further intervention is used after colorectal resection and forming of a primary anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ghost stoma

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* no informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cologne

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Evangelisches Klinikum Köln Weyertal gGmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Claudia Rudroff

Head of the Department for Visceral Surgery and Surgery of the lower Gastrointestinal Tract

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claudia L Rudroff, PhD MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

EVK Koeln

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Evangelisches Klinikum Koeln Weyertal

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):462-79. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9697. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25703524 (View on PubMed)

Ihnat P, Gunkova P, Peteja M, Vavra P, Pelikan A, Zonca P. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4809-4816. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4811-3. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26902615 (View on PubMed)

Sacchi M, Legge PD, Picozzi P, Papa F, Giovanni CL, Greco L. Virtual ileostomy following TME and primary sphincter-saving reconstruction for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Sep;54(78):1676-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18019692 (View on PubMed)

Hernandez AV, Otten J, Christ H, Ulrici C, Piriyev E, Ludwig S, Rudroff C. Ghost Ileostomy: Safe and Cost-effective Alternative to Ileostomy After Rectal Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. In Vivo. 2022 May-Jun;36(3):1290-1296. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12829.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35478159 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/021-007OL.html

Standard operating procedure on the treatment of colorectal cancer in Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GI_observational_01_20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.