A Clinical Evaluation of COVID-19 Rapid Point of Care Antigen Tests

NCT ID: NCT04568356

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-24

Study Completion Date

2020-09-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current standard of care for diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome associated Coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2 ) infection involves sample collection to be prepared and measured via real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This process is often time consuming depending on the level of automation within the laboratory processing the samples. In many cases, sample turn-around times can take hours to several days. A rapid assay that does not require the sophisticated laboratory equipment and techniques could provide a significant advantage to the way practitioners screen and ultimately treat patients. Moreover, the collection of samples from the nasal nares should prove useful and less invasive. The study aims to validate the use of nasal swabs and also to validate the antigen test using nasal swabs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A rapid point of care bioassay for the detection of virus proteins will be compared to the hospital validated RT-PCR detection standard. Nasopharyngeal, nasal and saliva samples will be collected along with hospital standard of care collection. Nasal and saliva will be self-administered collection. Samples will be collected in an Emergency Room setting from up to 100 subjects who entered the hospital over concerns about SARS-CoV-2. The goal is to collect a minimum of N=30 confirmed Covid-19 positive subjects and N=30 confirmed Covid-19 negative subjects of comparable ages, genders and races. The SARS-CoV-2 Direct Antigen Rapid Test ("DART") is an immunoassay for point-of-care, qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles/secreted protein in nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 infection. Dipsticks are printed with a monoclonal antibody that binds the signature SARS-CoV-2 viral particles/protein (Test line) and a control antibody (Control line) for quality control. A second monoclonal antibody is attached to gold nanoparticles (conjugate) and quencher buffer, and mixed with the patient samples, though in the near future the final format will contain the dry conjugate. The SARS-CoV-2 viral particles/Spike protein attach to both antibodies resulting in a visual line on the test strip within 15 minutes. Prior experience for detection virus and viral proteins via antibody binding using lateral flow are E25Bio portfolio platform for dengue, Zika and Chikungunya viruses among others.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SARS CoV-2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Antigen rapid test for COVID-19

The same group of patients participated in two arms of the study, one arm was for obtaining data on the rapid antigen test for COVID-19, the comparator arm was to obtain data from the RT-PCR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Direct Antigen Tests for COVID-19

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Rapid Antigen diagnostic device performance comparative to RT-PCR

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct Antigen Tests for COVID-19

Rapid Antigen diagnostic device performance comparative to RT-PCR

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of verbal informed consent form
* Subject is suspected case of COVID-19 by clinical criteria a patient with acute respiratory tract infection (sudden onset of at least one of the following: cough, fever, shortness of breath, fatigue, decreased appetite, myalgia)
* No other etiology that fully explains the clinical presentation
* With or without a history of close contact with a confirmed or probable COVID-19 case in the last 14 days prior to onset of symptoms.
* Subject is an appropriate candidate for Nasopharyngeal sample collection
* Subject is willing to provide nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples

Exclusion Criteria

• Individuals who present to ER with 10 or greater days of COVID-19 Related Symptoms, (Fever, Cough, Fatigue, Decreased Appetite, Shortness of Breath, Myalgia) or post-defervescence and/or convalescence
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SCRI Development Innovations, LLC

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

E25Bio, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gina Remington, RN MSN

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

HCA Healthcare Director of Research. Neuroscience and Orthopedic

Patrice Feaster, RN

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

SCRI Development Innovations, LLC

Klepler N De Almeida, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

JFK Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

JFK Medical Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kendall Regional

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Aventura Hospital and Medical Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Adriano A, Berhane S, Davenport C, Dittrich S, Emperador D, Takwoingi Y, Cunningham J, Beese S, Dretzke J, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Harris IM, Price MJ, Taylor-Phillips S, Hooft L, Leeflang MM, Spijker R, Van den Bruel A; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32845525 (View on PubMed)

Kyosei Y, Namba M, Yamura S, Takeuchi R, Aoki N, Nakaishi K, Watabe S, Ito E. Proposal of De Novo Antigen Test for COVID-19: Ultrasensitive Detection of Spike Proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 14;10(8):594. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080594.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32823866 (View on PubMed)

Hirotsu Y, Maejima M, Shibusawa M, Nagakubo Y, Hosaka K, Amemiya K, Sueki H, Hayakawa M, Mochizuki H, Tsutsui T, Kakizaki Y, Miyashita Y, Yagi S, Kojima S, Omata M. Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32800855 (View on PubMed)

Nagura-Ikeda M, Imai K, Tabata S, Miyoshi K, Murahara N, Mizuno T, Horiuchi M, Kato K, Imoto Y, Iwata M, Mimura S, Ito T, Tamura K, Kato Y. Clinical Evaluation of Self-Collected Saliva by Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), Direct RT-qPCR, Reverse Transcription-Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and a Rapid Antigen Test To Diagnose COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9):e01438-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01438-20. Print 2020 Aug 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32636214 (View on PubMed)

Mak GC, Cheng PK, Lau SS, Wong KK, Lau CS, Lam ET, Chan RC, Tsang DN. Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104500. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32585619 (View on PubMed)

Blairon L, Wilmet A, Beukinga I, Tre-Hardy M. Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104472. Epub 2020 May 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32504944 (View on PubMed)

Porte L, Legarraga P, Vollrath V, Aguilera X, Munita JM, Araos R, Pizarro G, Vial P, Iruretagoyena M, Dittrich S, Weitzel T. Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32497809 (View on PubMed)

Scohy A, Anantharajah A, Bodeus M, Kabamba-Mukadi B, Verroken A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis. J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104455. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455. Epub 2020 May 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32485618 (View on PubMed)

Lambert-Niclot S, Cuffel A, Le Pape S, Vauloup-Fellous C, Morand-Joubert L, Roque-Afonso AM, Le Goff J, Delaugerre C. Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal Swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):e00977-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00977-20. Print 2020 Jul 23. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32404480 (View on PubMed)

Cui Z, Chang H, Wang H, Lim B, Hsu CC, Yu Y, Jia H, Wang Y, Zeng Y, Ji M, Liu W, Inverarity C, Huang WE. Development of a rapid test kit for SARS-CoV-2: an example of product design. Biodes Manuf. 2020;3(2):83-86. doi: 10.1007/s42242-020-00075-7. Epub 2020 May 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32395391 (View on PubMed)

Bosch I, de Puig H, Hiley M, Carre-Camps M, Perdomo-Celis F, Narvaez CF, Salgado DM, Senthoor D, O'Grady M, Phillips E, Durbin A, Fandos D, Miyazaki H, Yen CW, Gelvez-Ramirez M, Warke RV, Ribeiro LS, Teixeira MM, Almeida RP, Munoz-Medina JE, Ludert JE, Nogueira ML, Colombo TE, Terzian ACB, Bozza PT, Calheiros AS, Vieira YR, Barbosa-Lima G, Vizzoni A, Cerbino-Neto J, Bozza FA, Souza TML, Trugilho MRO, de Filippis AMB, de Sequeira PC, Marques ETA, Magalhaes T, Diaz FJ, Restrepo BN, Marin K, Mattar S, Olson D, Asturias EJ, Lucera M, Singla M, Medigeshi GR, de Bosch N, Tam J, Gomez-Marquez J, Clavet C, Villar L, Hamad-Schifferli K, Gehrke L. Rapid antigen tests for dengue virus serotypes and Zika virus in patient serum. Sci Transl Med. 2017 Sep 27;9(409):eaan1589. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan1589.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28954927 (View on PubMed)

Arnaout R, Lee RA, Lee GR, Callahan C, Yen CF, Smith KP, Arora R, Kirby JE. SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Jun 4:2020.06.02.131144. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.02.131144.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32577640 (View on PubMed)

Carpenter CR, Mudd PA, West CP, Wilber E, Wilber ST. Diagnosing COVID-19 in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review of Clinical Examinations, Laboratory Tests, Imaging Accuracy, and Biases. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;27(8):653-670. doi: 10.1111/acem.14048. Epub 2020 Jul 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32542934 (View on PubMed)

Kucirka LM, Lauer SA, Laeyendecker O, Boon D, Lessler J. Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):262-267. doi: 10.7326/M20-1495. Epub 2020 May 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32422057 (View on PubMed)

Wang X, Tan L, Wang X, Liu W, Lu Y, Cheng L, Sun Z. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in 353 patients received tests with both specimens simultaneously. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32315809 (View on PubMed)

Buitrago-Garcia D, Egli-Gany D, Counotte MJ, Hossmann S, Imeri H, Ipekci AM, Salanti G, Low N. Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32960881 (View on PubMed)

Pondaven-Letourmy S, Alvin F, Boumghit Y, Simon F. How to perform a nasopharyngeal swab in adults and children in the COVID-19 era. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020 Sep;137(4):325-327. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32646750 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E25001_NEU2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SARS-CoV-2 OTC At Home Test
NCT05553964 TERMINATED NA
Rapid, Onsite COVID-19 Detection
NCT04460690 COMPLETED NA