Saliva as Source of Detection for SARS-CoV-2

NCT ID: NCT04424446

Last Updated: 2021-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

456 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-13

Study Completion Date

2020-09-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabbing is being used to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this, a swab is inserted deep into the back of the nose to collect a sample. It can cause discomfort for most people. Researchers want to find an easier way to collect samples.

Objective:

To learn if testing for SARSCoV-2 with a saliva sample only, a nasal swab from just the front part of the nostril only, or a saliva sample plus a nasal swab gives results that are as accurate as the NP swab.

Eligibility:

NIH staff members age 18 and older who are taking part in NIH CC SARS-CoV-2 surveillance.

Design:

The Occupational Medical Service (OMS) collects NP swabs as part of standard NIH staff screening. Participants will give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs when their NP swab is collected by OMS. If their NP swab was already collected, their OMS record will be reviewed for the result.

If the NP swab result is positive, the participant will have another NP swab. At that time, they will also give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs. If the NP swab result is negative, they will give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs the next time they have an NP swab.

For the saliva sample, participants will spit into a tube.

For the nasal swab, the inside of the front part of the nostril will be swabbed.

Participation ends after the study samples are collected. Participants can choose to keep giving saliva and nasal swab samples each time they have an NP swab.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Because of the inconvenience of nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection, we are interested in identifying different strategies for detecting infection. A technique that is less intrusive would put individuals undergoing testing at lower risk for complications, would likely increase compliance with subsequent tests, and would decrease risk to the providers who are conducting the test. For asymptomatic screening, some institutions are using midturbinate swabs instead of NP swabs, for increased compliance due to decreased discomfort. The NIH has switched to midturbinate collection in asymptomatic collections only. A test that would require only expectorating saliva and/or collection of a midturbinate swab would address the issues of NP collection discomfort. Saliva is the most preferred by patients or asymptomatic staff due to no collection in the nasal cavity at all. Although the CDC lists midturbinate swab as an acceptable specimen type, there are minimal data about the sensitivity of this collection for SARS-CoV-2, and decisions to use midturbinate swabs are based in part on experience with other respiratory viruses. Also, if saliva were found to be equivalent to NP for patient testing, there will be a benefit to future patients in providing this option for testing. Therefore, we propose to validate these sample types for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The RT-PCR results based on a saliva sample alone or a saliva sample coupled with a midturbinate swab, will be correlated with the results using surveillance or diagnostic swab samples to validate their use for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID-19

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NIH staff

NIH staff undergoing standard NIH COVID-19 screening willing to donate additional research samples.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

1. Is one of the following:

1. An NIH staff member participating in NIH CC SARS-CoV-2 surveillance, or
2. A WHC patient who had or is having a diagnostic NP RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.
2. Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
3. Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

1. Inability or unwillingness to have NP sampling or midturbinate sampling (applies to NIH site only).
2. Inability or unwillingness to provide saliva sample (applies to both NIH and WHC sites).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen M Frank, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-CC-0128

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

200128

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rapid, Onsite COVID-19 Detection
NCT04460690 COMPLETED NA
Inpatient COVID-19 Lollipop Study
NCT05801341 TERMINATED NA