Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04562610
Last Updated: 2025-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-18
2024-10-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine Intravenous Infusion on Postoperative Recovery After Spine Surgery.
NCT02762656
A Preemptive Epidural Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT01117610
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia
NCT02529501
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conventional Analgesia in Complex Spine Surgery
NCT04156581
Continuous Wound Infusion in Lumbar or Thoracic Surgery
NCT01743794
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While distinct components of the ERAS pathway have been investigated in spine surgery including preoperative education, multimodal pain management, surgical approach, nutrition, and physical therapy, few studies have investigated the collective application of these interventions. Furthermore, these studies have been retrospective in nature, limiting their generalizability.The goal of this study is to perform a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of oral versus intravenous medications preoperatively. The investigators also plan to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the standard of care ERAS principles on the outcome of patients undergoing elective spine surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: All oral pre-operative analgesics
Group A patients will be administered the following medications in the preoperative holding area:
* Acetaminophen 1,000 mg by mouth prior to operation
* Celecoxib 200mg by mouth prior to operation
* Tranexamic acid 2 grams by mouth prior to operation
* Gabapentin 600mg by mouth prior to operation
All oral administration group
Subjects in the oral administration group will receive the following pre-emptive analgesic drugs, acetaminophen 1,000mg, Celecoxib 200mg and gabapentin 600mg via the oral route prior to operation. In addition they will receive the antifibrinolytic drug, tranexamic acid 2,000mg via an oral route as well prior to operation.
Group B: Intravenous agents
Group B patients will receive:
* Acetaminophen (Ofirmev) 1,000mg intravenous prior to operation
* Celecoxib 200mg by mouth prior to operation
* Tranexamic acid 2grams intravenous at start of operation
* Gabapentin 600 mg by mouth prior to operation
Intravenous Infusion group
The intravenous infusion group will receive two medications via the intravenous infusion route. These medications are Ofirmev ( acetaminophen ) 1,000mg and tranexamic acid 2,000 mg , an antifibrinolytic drug. In addition to these drugs, study subjects will receive Celecoxib 200mg by mouth and Gabapentin 600 mg by mouth prior to operation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravenous Infusion group
The intravenous infusion group will receive two medications via the intravenous infusion route. These medications are Ofirmev ( acetaminophen ) 1,000mg and tranexamic acid 2,000 mg , an antifibrinolytic drug. In addition to these drugs, study subjects will receive Celecoxib 200mg by mouth and Gabapentin 600 mg by mouth prior to operation.
All oral administration group
Subjects in the oral administration group will receive the following pre-emptive analgesic drugs, acetaminophen 1,000mg, Celecoxib 200mg and gabapentin 600mg via the oral route prior to operation. In addition they will receive the antifibrinolytic drug, tranexamic acid 2,000mg via an oral route as well prior to operation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Oncologic procedures
* Patient's with comorbidities preventing early postoperative mobilization
* Patients with contraindications to tranexamic acid (TXA) administration including but not limited to patients with a history of thromboembolic or ischemic events (PE, DVT, CVA, MI). Additional contraindications are decided by treating orthopaedic surgeon
18 Years
105 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rolando F Roberto, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Univeristy of California Davis Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
Carli F. Physiologic considerations of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs: implications of the stress response. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;62(2):110-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0264-0. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Wainwright TW, Immins T, Middleton RG. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and its applicability for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;30(1):91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
Starks I, Wainwright TW, Lewis J, Lloyd J, Middleton RG. Older patients have the most to gain from orthopaedic enhanced recovery programmes. Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):642-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu014. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
Aasvang EK, Luna IE, Kehlet H. Challenges in postdischarge function and recovery: the case of fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):861-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev257. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, Singh K. Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 15;39(6):476-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000165.
Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS. Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):369-376. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822.
Ortman, Jennifer M, Velkoff, Victoria A, Hogan H. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States. Washington DC; 2014.
Smith J, Probst S, Calandra C, Davis R, Sugimoto K, Nie L, Gan TJ, Bennett-Guerrero E. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for lumbar spine fusion. Perioper Med (Lond). 2019 May 28;8:4. doi: 10.1186/s13741-019-0114-2. eCollection 2019.
Corniola MV, Debono B, Joswig H, Lemee JM, Tessitore E. Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18657.
Angus M, Jackson K, Smurthwaite G, Carrasco R, Mohammad S, Verma R, Siddique I. The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in complex spinal surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019 Mar;5(1):116-123. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.01.07.
Elsarrag M, Soldozy S, Patel P, Norat P, Sokolowski JD, Park MS, Tvrdik P, Kalani MYS. Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18700.
de Castro SM, van den Esschert JW, van Heek NT, Dalhuisen S, Koelemay MJ, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. A systematic review of the efficacy of gum chewing for the amelioration of postoperative ileus. Dig Surg. 2008;25(1):39-45. doi: 10.1159/000117822. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
Ali ZS, Ma TS, Ozturk AK, Malhotra NR, Schuster JM, Marcotte PJ, Grady MS, Welch WC. Pre-optimization of spinal surgery patients: Development of a neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;164:142-153. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Bilku DK, Dennison AR, Hall TC, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G. Role of preoperative carbohydrate loading: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Jan;96(1):15-22. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13824511650614.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Learn more or sign up for the study here!
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1586560
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.