The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain After Lumbar Spinal Fusion

NCT ID: NCT01319682

Last Updated: 2013-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine injection on the relief of pain in patients undergoing 1-level posterior lumbar fusion.

A total of 54 patients will be randomized into one of two groups (group C or group I) based on Excel number generation.

Patients in group C will receive received normal saline intravenous injection, and patients in group I will receive an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.

Visual analogue scale pain scores, fentanyl consumption and the frequency at which patients pushed the button (FPB) of a patient-controlled analgesia system will be recorded at 4, 12, 24, 48 hours postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pain Preemptive Lidocaine Intravenous Lumbar fusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intravenous lidocaine injection group

Patients in Group I (intravenous lidocaine injection group) received an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravenous lidocaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in Group I (intravenous lidocaine injection group) received an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.

Placebo control group

Patients in Group C (placebo control group) received normal saline intravenous injection

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Intravenous normal saline injection

Intervention Type DRUG

The patients in Group C (placebo control group) received normal saline intravenous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous lidocaine injection

Patients in Group I (intravenous lidocaine injection group) received an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous normal saline injection

The patients in Group C (placebo control group) received normal saline intravenous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

IV lidocaine IV saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1-level posterior lumbar fusion

Exclusion Criteria

* mental change
* allergy to local anesthetics
* chronic analgesics user
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hyun Kang

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hyun Kang, Ph.D.,

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

Young-Baeg Kim, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ChungAng University

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim KT, Cho DC, Sung JK, Kim YB, Kang H, Song KS, Choi GJ. Intraoperative systemic infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative pain after lumbar surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.031. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24216403 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ChungAngUH2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id