General Movement Assessment - Ancillary Study to SafeBoosC III Trial

NCT ID: NCT04555915

Last Updated: 2022-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In course of the SafeBoosC III trial, we would like to analyse routinely performed GMA as secondary outcome parameter in an ancillary observational study.

First aim is to analyse in surviving neonates included into the SafeboosC III trial any differences between the experimental group group and control group in Global-GMA at term age.

Second aim is to investigate GMOS at term age and if available GMA at 9-16 weeks corrected age.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVE In course of the SafeBoosC III trial, we would like to analyse routinely performed GMA as as secondary outcome parameter in an ancillary observational study.

First aim is to analyse in surviving neonates included into the SafeboosC III trial any differences between the experimental group group and control group in Global-GMA at term age.

Second aim is to investigate GMOS at term age and if available GMA at 9-16 weeks corrected age.

HYPOTHESES We hypothesise that the surviving preterm neonates in the experimental group of the SafeBoosC III trial show better results in Global-GMA at term age compared to surviving neonates in the control group.

Furthermore, we hypothesise that the surviving preterm neonates in the experimental group of the SafeBoosC III trial show better results in GMOS at term age and in GMA if available at 9-16 weeks corrected age.

METHODS Trial design It will be a pilot observational ancillary study to the SafeBoosC III trial.

Eligibility Preterm neonates included in SafeBoosC III trial are eligible to be included in this ancillary study. Neonates will be included, in whom GM assessment is performed routinely at corrected term age or before discharge and optionally at a corrected age between 9 to 16 weeks. The infants are recorded according to routine after feeding, during periods of active wakefulness and lying in a supine position for 10-20 minutes. To evaluate the GMA visual Prechtl Gestalt perception are used. Because of the routine use in GMA, handling should reach the quality parameters, necessary for an optimal interpretation of these results.

Outcome measures Primary outcome measure for this ancillary observational study will be Global-GMA at term age Secondary outcome measure for this ancillary observational study will be GMOS at term age and if available GMA at a corrected age between 9 to 16 weeks.

Blinding Interpretation of Global-GMA and GMOS will be performed by analysing pseudo-anonymised video-recordings by persons trained in GMA and not involved in the care of the neonates.

GMA Data Global GMA will be classified as normal and abnormal (poor repertoire, chaotic, cramped synchronised at term age/absent fidgety movements at corrected age of 9-16 weeks). GMOS will be scored from zero to 42.

Data managing plan Demographic data will be handled according the data managing plan of the SafeboosC III protocol in its latest version.

GMA and GMOS data will be anonymised at each centre participating in this ancillary study with the local patient ID used in the SafeboosC III trial and handled according to local guidelines. Local statistical analyses will be performed in each participating centre in this ancillary study and just the results of these statistical analyses will be transferred to Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria for overall/meta-analyses.

Statistical analyses Baseline characteristics of neonates will be given as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range for continuous data and as numbers and percentages for categorical data. Comparison of baseline characteristics will be done by using t-Test or Mann Whitney U-test for continuous data and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data. To answer the primary hypothesis whether global GMA differ between neonates of the control group and neonates of the intervention group OR will be calculated within each center. To analyze the secondary outcome measure GOMS a modified version of Agresti's (1980) generalized odds ratio (genOR), which accounts for ties, will be calculated within each center.

genOR=(Prob(Y\_1\<Y\_2))/(Prob(Y\_1\>Y\_2)) Since data are collected in the same study and therefore the study designs are the same, we assume the treatment effect to be the same and differences in the results between centers are due to a random error. As a consequence data will be combined using fixed effect models. Overall OR for the global GMA and the GOMS will be calculated and Forest plots drawn.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

General Movement Assessment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Intervention Group of the SafeboosC Phase III Trial

Monitoring of cerebral oxygenation

Intervention Type OTHER

Modify cardio-respiratory support to avoid cerebral hypoxia

Control group

Control Group of the SafeboosC Phase III Trial

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Monitoring of cerebral oxygenation

Modify cardio-respiratory support to avoid cerebral hypoxia

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inclusion in the SafeBoosC III Trial
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Missing written parental informed consent
* Decision not to conduct full life support
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of Graz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pichler Gerhard, MD.

Univ. Prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gerhard Pichler, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Graz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep. of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GMA Version 1.2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perinatal Risk Factors in Motor Development
NCT07310459 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Fetal Brain Growth - Pilot Study
NCT05994443 RECRUITING