General Movement Assessment - Ancillary Study to SafeBoosC III Trial
NCT ID: NCT04555915
Last Updated: 2022-07-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-07-01
2022-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
First aim is to analyse in surviving neonates included into the SafeboosC III trial any differences between the experimental group group and control group in Global-GMA at term age.
Second aim is to investigate GMOS at term age and if available GMA at 9-16 weeks corrected age.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Applying Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements for Preterm Infants Through Telemedicine
NCT03742635
This Study Aims to Evaluate the Validity of Family-led Recordings for General Movement Assessment (GMA) Compared to Provider-led Recording in Neonates Born Under 29weeks
NCT07141654
Fidgety Movements of Preterm Neonates Included in COSGOD III
NCT06105333
Study of Generalized Movements for Early Prediction of Cerebral Palsy
NCT00749008
GMA and Peri in Moderate-late Preterms
NCT04073836
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
First aim is to analyse in surviving neonates included into the SafeboosC III trial any differences between the experimental group group and control group in Global-GMA at term age.
Second aim is to investigate GMOS at term age and if available GMA at 9-16 weeks corrected age.
HYPOTHESES We hypothesise that the surviving preterm neonates in the experimental group of the SafeBoosC III trial show better results in Global-GMA at term age compared to surviving neonates in the control group.
Furthermore, we hypothesise that the surviving preterm neonates in the experimental group of the SafeBoosC III trial show better results in GMOS at term age and in GMA if available at 9-16 weeks corrected age.
METHODS Trial design It will be a pilot observational ancillary study to the SafeBoosC III trial.
Eligibility Preterm neonates included in SafeBoosC III trial are eligible to be included in this ancillary study. Neonates will be included, in whom GM assessment is performed routinely at corrected term age or before discharge and optionally at a corrected age between 9 to 16 weeks. The infants are recorded according to routine after feeding, during periods of active wakefulness and lying in a supine position for 10-20 minutes. To evaluate the GMA visual Prechtl Gestalt perception are used. Because of the routine use in GMA, handling should reach the quality parameters, necessary for an optimal interpretation of these results.
Outcome measures Primary outcome measure for this ancillary observational study will be Global-GMA at term age Secondary outcome measure for this ancillary observational study will be GMOS at term age and if available GMA at a corrected age between 9 to 16 weeks.
Blinding Interpretation of Global-GMA and GMOS will be performed by analysing pseudo-anonymised video-recordings by persons trained in GMA and not involved in the care of the neonates.
GMA Data Global GMA will be classified as normal and abnormal (poor repertoire, chaotic, cramped synchronised at term age/absent fidgety movements at corrected age of 9-16 weeks). GMOS will be scored from zero to 42.
Data managing plan Demographic data will be handled according the data managing plan of the SafeboosC III protocol in its latest version.
GMA and GMOS data will be anonymised at each centre participating in this ancillary study with the local patient ID used in the SafeboosC III trial and handled according to local guidelines. Local statistical analyses will be performed in each participating centre in this ancillary study and just the results of these statistical analyses will be transferred to Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria for overall/meta-analyses.
Statistical analyses Baseline characteristics of neonates will be given as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range for continuous data and as numbers and percentages for categorical data. Comparison of baseline characteristics will be done by using t-Test or Mann Whitney U-test for continuous data and Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data. To answer the primary hypothesis whether global GMA differ between neonates of the control group and neonates of the intervention group OR will be calculated within each center. To analyze the secondary outcome measure GOMS a modified version of Agresti's (1980) generalized odds ratio (genOR), which accounts for ties, will be calculated within each center.
genOR=(Prob(Y\_1\<Y\_2))/(Prob(Y\_1\>Y\_2)) Since data are collected in the same study and therefore the study designs are the same, we assume the treatment effect to be the same and differences in the results between centers are due to a random error. As a consequence data will be combined using fixed effect models. Overall OR for the global GMA and the GOMS will be calculated and Forest plots drawn.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Intervention Group of the SafeboosC Phase III Trial
Monitoring of cerebral oxygenation
Modify cardio-respiratory support to avoid cerebral hypoxia
Control group
Control Group of the SafeboosC Phase III Trial
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Monitoring of cerebral oxygenation
Modify cardio-respiratory support to avoid cerebral hypoxia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Decision not to conduct full life support
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Medical University of Graz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pichler Gerhard, MD.
Univ. Prof
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gerhard Pichler, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Graz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dep. of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz
Graz, Styria, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GMA Version 1.2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.