Effect of Age, Body Mass Index and Tumor Sidedness in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04543019
Last Updated: 2020-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-12-31
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
BMI and Lymph Node Count in Colorectal Cancer
NCT06334926
Study on the No.253 Lymph Node Metastasis Patterns in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancer
NCT06135571
Psoas Density in Colorectal Cancer
NCT04198025
Multi-Reader Multi-Case Trial Evaluating Computer-Aided Tool for Prognostic Prediction of Colorectal Liver Metastases
NCT07027605
Prognostic Impact of Increased Lymph Node Yield in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Distant Metastasis: a Population-based Study of the US Database and a Chinese Registry
NCT05550701
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 26% of CRCs are diagnosed at stage IV among patients aged younger than 50 years, compared with 23% in those aged 50 to 64 years and 19% among those aged 65 years and older. Overall survival (OS) among patients younger than 50 years (68%) is similar to that in those 50 to 64 years (69%) because of a later stage at diagnosis.
Obesity is associated with an increased incidence of CRC . In recent studies body mass index (BMI) was prognostic for overall survival and progression free survival. That is risk of progression and/or death was greatest for low BMI; risk decreased as BMI increased. BMI was not predictive of treatment effect . Cachexia and associated poor performance status have previously been identified as negative prognostic factors in patients with CRC.
Tumor sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in patients with early and metastatic CRC as left-sided primaries have improved outcomes. sidedness also represents a powerful predictor of benefit from anti epidermal growth factor receptor\[EGFR\] inhibitors therapies in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic CRC (mCRC) .
The mainstay of treatment of mCRC includes cytotoxic chemotherapy with the addition of a molecularly targeted agent . The cytotoxic regimens that are usually used include a combination of oxaliplatin or irinotecan with a fluoropyrimidine, in addition to targeted agents such as \[EGFR\] inhibitors for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC or vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pathologically proven colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.
* Stage IV colorectal cancer.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not pathologically proven colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.
* Stage I, II and III colorectal cancer.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gehad Ahmed Abd El-Razik
principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, Pentheroudakis G, Yamazaki K, Xu RH, Kim TW, Ismail F, Tan IB, Yeh KH, Grothey A, Zhang S, Ahn JB, Mastura MY, Chong D, Chen LT, Kopetz S, Eguchi-Nakajima T, Ebi H, Ohtsu A, Cervantes A, Muro K, Tabernero J, Minami H, Ciardiello F, Douillard JY. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):44-70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx738.
El-Deiry WS, Vijayvergia N, Xiu J, Scicchitano A, Lim B, Yee NS, Harvey HA, Gatalica Z, Reddy S. Molecular profiling of 6,892 colorectal cancer samples suggests different possible treatment options specific to metastatic sites. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(12):1726-37. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1113356.
Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, Mosconi S, Mandala M, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi64-72. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt354. No abstract available.
Murphy CC, Harlan LC, Lund JL, Lynch CF, Geiger AM. Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: 1990-2010. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jul 23;107(10):djv198. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv198. Print 2015 Oct.
Larsson SC, Wolk A. Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Sep;86(3):556-65. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.3.556.
Renfro LA, Loupakis F, Adams RA, Seymour MT, Heinemann V, Schmoll HJ, Douillard JY, Hurwitz H, Fuchs CS, Diaz-Rubio E, Porschen R, Tournigand C, Chibaudel B, Falcone A, Tebbutt NC, Punt CJ, Hecht JR, Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Goldberg RM, Saltz LB, de Gramont A, Sargent DJ, Lenz HJ. Body Mass Index Is Prognostic in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Patients From First-Line Clinical Trials in the ARCAD Database. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):144-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6441. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
Argiles JM, Busquets S, Stemmler B, Lopez-Soriano FJ. Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014 Nov;14(11):754-62. doi: 10.1038/nrc3829. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Tisdale MJ. Cachexia in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Nov;2(11):862-71. doi: 10.1038/nrc927. No abstract available.
Thoresen L, Frykholm G, Lydersen S, Ulveland H, Baracos V, Prado CM, Birdsell L, Falkmer U. Nutritional status, cachexia and survival in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Different assessment criteria for nutritional status provide unequal results. Clin Nutr. 2013 Feb;32(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, Ghidini M, Turati L, Dallera P, Passalacqua R, Sgroi G, Barni S. Prognostic Survival Associated With Left-Sided vs Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;3(2):211-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227.
Van Cutsem E, Oliveira J; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20 Suppl 4:61-3. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp130. No abstract available.
Hochster HS, Grothey A, Hart L, Rowland K, Ansari R, Alberts S, Chowhan N, Ramanathan RK, Keaton M, Hainsworth JD, Childs BH. Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jun;25(6):1172-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu107. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
systemic therapy in mCRC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.