Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-01
2017-08-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Follow-up After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05656326
Effects of Video Information on Preoperative Anxiety in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT02873455
The Effect of Routine Video-recording on Colonoscopy Quality Indicators.
NCT02054923
Quality Improvement of Patient-Provider Communication For Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT00324753
Feasibility and Psychometric Properties of Paper vs. Web vs. Automated Telephone Administration of Patient Reported Outcome Surveys
NCT01458509
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
F2F-Group
Patients who preferred a traditional F2F-appointment were seen at the outpatient clinic.
No interventions assigned to this group
VC-group
Patients who preferred a video consult were seen over a video connection.
Video consultation
A two-way audio and visual connection between patients and surgeons
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Video consultation
A two-way audio and visual connection between patients and surgeons
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fluent in speaking and writing in Dutch
* Follow up appointments in which overall progress, new complaints, results with good news and treatment was discussed were considered feasible.
Exclusion Criteria
* Bad news consultations
* Physical examination needed
* No access to Internet
* No access to a smartphone, tablet or computer with a camera
* Not willing to activate their electronic patient portal
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. dr. W.A. Bemelman
Prof. dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W17_149
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.