The UPPROACH (Upfront Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy) Approach

NCT ID: NCT04527900

Last Updated: 2025-06-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-23

Study Completion Date

2024-07-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A phase 2 study with the primary objective of testing treatment compliance of Upfront Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy (IMPT) and Concurrent Chemotherapy (UPPROACH) for Post-operative Treatment in Loco-regionally Advanced Endometrial Cancer is non-inferior to the historic compliance rate of the chemoradiation arm of GOG 258 study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While there is a consensus that both adjuvant ChT and RT benefit patients with respect to locoregional and distant control, the sequencing of these therapies varies between institutions. Common approaches include sequential treatment, with 4-6 cycles of ChT followed by RT, sandwich therapy with RT sandwiched between 3 cycles of ChT, or concurrent CRT. Small retrospective studies have shown a benefit with respect to PFS and OS in the sandwich approach, however this has not been replicated in larger studies.

In more recent years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has become an increasingly common modality for the treatment of uterine malignancies and is capable of even more precise dose distributions than photon-based RT due to intrinsic properties of these much heavier particles. Dosimetric/planning studies from other institutions confirm the significant reduction of dose to critical normal tissues like bladder, bowel, rectum, and bone marrow.

Preliminary data from the University of Maryland Medical Center has suggested that IMPT using pencil beam scanning is feasible in patients with endometrial cancer, with only 10% of patients developing grade 2 GI toxicity and no patients developing ≥ grade 3 GI or GU toxicities (abstract under review).

The investigators would like to test the hypothesis that in the postoperative setting, patients with advanced endometrial cancer will be able to complete a course of full dose ChT - carboplatin and paclitaxel - concurrent with upfront pelvic IMPT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endometrial Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Concurrent chemoradiation

Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel and IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

carboplatin and paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

carboplatin and paclitaxel 5-6 cycles (dosage per standard of care according to treating oncologist)

pelvic IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)

Intervention Type RADIATION

whole pelvis will receive a total dose of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to 5040 cGy in 28 fractions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carboplatin and paclitaxel

carboplatin and paclitaxel 5-6 cycles (dosage per standard of care according to treating oncologist)

Intervention Type DRUG

pelvic IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)

whole pelvis will receive a total dose of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to 5040 cGy in 28 fractions

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Surgery must have included a hysterectomy. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymph node sampling, para-aortic lymph node sampling, and omentectomy are optional
2. Patients will be staged according to FIGO 2009 staging system. Eligibility is defined based on clinical-pathologic features.
3. Patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with the following:

* Stage IA grade 3 with extensive LVSI
* Stage IB grade 3
* Stage II
* Stage III (A, B, and C)
* Stage IVA who are recommended adjuvant whole pelvic RT (+/- lower para-aortic up to renal hilum) and systemic chemotherapy.
4. Patients with clear cell, serous papillary carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma with stages IA-III who are recommended adjuvant whole pelvic RT (+/- lower para-aortic up to renal hilum) and systemic chemotherapy.
5. Patients with a GOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
6. Patients with adequate organ function, reflected by the following parameters:

* WBC ≥ 3000/mcl
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/mcl
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl
* SGOT, SGPT, and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN
* Creatinine ≤ institutional ULN (if serum creatinine \> ULN, estimated GFR ≥ 45 ml/min)
7. Patients who have signed an approved informed consent and authorization permitting release of personal health information
8. Patients must be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with leiomyosarcoma
2. Patients with clinically significant pelvic or para-aortic nodal disease, on post-surgery CT scan, that was not dissected and would require higher boost dose
3. Patients with recurrent endometrial cancer with gross nodal or vaginal disease requiring high dose radiotherapy, or history of prior chemotherapy
4. Patients with a history of prior pelvic/abdominal RT or with history of prior cancer treatment that contraindicates this protocol therapy including history of prior chemotherapy for any other malignancy.
5. Patients with a history of serious co-morbid illness or uncontrolled illnesses that would preclude protocol therapy
6. Patients with an estimated survival of less than three months
7. Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IVB endometrial cancer
8. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia within 3 months from enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Radiation Oncology

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pranshu Mohindra, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Maryland/Maryland Proton Treatment Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maryland Proton Treatment Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

UMMC

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Central Maryland Radiation Oncology

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore Washington Medical Center

Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00092397

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.