The UPPROACH (Upfront Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Therapy) Approach
NCT ID: NCT04527900
Last Updated: 2025-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-23
2024-07-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paclitaxel and Intraperitoneal Carboplatin Followed by Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage IIIC-IV Uterine Cancer
NCT02112552
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Pelvis With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cervical Cancer That Has Been Removed By Surgery
NCT00331760
Pembro/Carbo/Taxol in Endometrial Cancer
NCT02549209
Testing the Addition of the Immunotherapy Drug Pembrolizumab to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Paclitaxel and Carboplatin) in Stage III-IV or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
NCT03914612
Paclitaxel and Carboplatin With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
NCT01167712
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In more recent years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has become an increasingly common modality for the treatment of uterine malignancies and is capable of even more precise dose distributions than photon-based RT due to intrinsic properties of these much heavier particles. Dosimetric/planning studies from other institutions confirm the significant reduction of dose to critical normal tissues like bladder, bowel, rectum, and bone marrow.
Preliminary data from the University of Maryland Medical Center has suggested that IMPT using pencil beam scanning is feasible in patients with endometrial cancer, with only 10% of patients developing grade 2 GI toxicity and no patients developing ≥ grade 3 GI or GU toxicities (abstract under review).
The investigators would like to test the hypothesis that in the postoperative setting, patients with advanced endometrial cancer will be able to complete a course of full dose ChT - carboplatin and paclitaxel - concurrent with upfront pelvic IMPT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Concurrent chemoradiation
Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel and IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)
carboplatin and paclitaxel
carboplatin and paclitaxel 5-6 cycles (dosage per standard of care according to treating oncologist)
pelvic IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)
whole pelvis will receive a total dose of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to 5040 cGy in 28 fractions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carboplatin and paclitaxel
carboplatin and paclitaxel 5-6 cycles (dosage per standard of care according to treating oncologist)
pelvic IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)
whole pelvis will receive a total dose of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions to 5040 cGy in 28 fractions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients will be staged according to FIGO 2009 staging system. Eligibility is defined based on clinical-pathologic features.
3. Patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with the following:
* Stage IA grade 3 with extensive LVSI
* Stage IB grade 3
* Stage II
* Stage III (A, B, and C)
* Stage IVA who are recommended adjuvant whole pelvic RT (+/- lower para-aortic up to renal hilum) and systemic chemotherapy.
4. Patients with clear cell, serous papillary carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma with stages IA-III who are recommended adjuvant whole pelvic RT (+/- lower para-aortic up to renal hilum) and systemic chemotherapy.
5. Patients with a GOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
6. Patients with adequate organ function, reflected by the following parameters:
* WBC ≥ 3000/mcl
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1000/mcl
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl
* SGOT, SGPT, and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 X ULN
* Creatinine ≤ institutional ULN (if serum creatinine \> ULN, estimated GFR ≥ 45 ml/min)
7. Patients who have signed an approved informed consent and authorization permitting release of personal health information
8. Patients must be 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with clinically significant pelvic or para-aortic nodal disease, on post-surgery CT scan, that was not dissected and would require higher boost dose
3. Patients with recurrent endometrial cancer with gross nodal or vaginal disease requiring high dose radiotherapy, or history of prior chemotherapy
4. Patients with a history of prior pelvic/abdominal RT or with history of prior cancer treatment that contraindicates this protocol therapy including history of prior chemotherapy for any other malignancy.
5. Patients with a history of serious co-morbid illness or uncontrolled illnesses that would preclude protocol therapy
6. Patients with an estimated survival of less than three months
7. Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IVB endometrial cancer
8. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia within 3 months from enrollment
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of Radiation Oncology
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pranshu Mohindra, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland/Maryland Proton Treatment Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maryland Proton Treatment Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
UMMC
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Central Maryland Radiation Oncology
Columbia, Maryland, United States
Baltimore Washington Medical Center
Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00092397
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.