Different Ways of Airway Management in Elective Minor Surgeries in Geriatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT04509960

Last Updated: 2021-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-15

Study Completion Date

2021-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

different ways of airway management in elective minor surgeries of geriatric patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will used two different ways of pro-seal laryngeal mask insertion technique (laryngoscopy- guided technique or the standard technique) in elective minor surgeries of geriatric toothless patients.

The investigators will record the respiratory dynamics, heartbeat, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures every 5 minutes during surgery. The investigators will record the laryngeal mask insertion time and oropharyngeal leakage pressure. The investigators will evaluate the placement of a laryngeal mask according to young criteria. The development and severity of coughing, retching, laryngospasm, extremity, and head movement during laryngeal mask placement will be recorded. Bloodstains, sore throat, hoarseness will be recorded on the mask that may develop due to laryngeal mask placement. The investigators will use the Briacombe scoring and Campbell category system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comparison of Different Laryngeal Mask Wearing Methods

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

proseal laryngeal mask insertion

no intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

proseal laryngeal mask insertion with laryngoscope

with the help of direct laryngoscopy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

direct laryngoskopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Proseal Laryngeal mask inserted with direct laryngoskopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

direct laryngoskopy

Proseal Laryngeal mask inserted with direct laryngoskopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA physical status I or II or III
2. Who were scheduled to minor elective ambulatory surgery (e.g. urology operations)
3. Patients undergoing general anesthesia
4. Those who are planned to wear a laryngeal mask for surgical procedure

Exclusion Criteria

1. patients with full stomach
2. A history of gastric reflux
3. A history of convulsions, cardiovascular or neuromuscular disease
4. Allergies to the study drugs
5. obese (Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg / m2)
6. suspected difficult airway and hyper-reactive airway disease
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara Diskapi Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Filiz Akaslan

specialist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Siences Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit T&R hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Filiz Akaslan

Role: CONTACT

03125962553

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chandan SN, Sharma SM, Raveendra US, Rajendra Prasad B. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Jun;8(2):95-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0025-8. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23139483 (View on PubMed)

Kim GW, Kim JY, Kim SJ, Moon YR, Park EJ, Park SY. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30611202 (View on PubMed)

Choo CY, Koay CK, Yoong CS. A randomised controlled trial comparing two insertion techniques for the Laryngeal Mask Airway Flexible in patients undergoing dental surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012 Sep;67(9):986-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07167.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22686571 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LMA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes
NCT06649526 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING