Comparison of the Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron Versus the Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron in HBR PCI Population
NCT ID: NCT04500912
Last Updated: 2023-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
736 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-14
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-eluting Stent With Bioabsorbable Polymer in Patients Receiving Chronic Oral Anticoagulation
NCT06863155
Randomized "All-comer" Evaluation of a Permanent Polymer Resolute Integrity Stent Versus a Polymer Free Cre8 Stent
NCT02328898
Post-Market Registry to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the The SUPRAFLEX CRUZ™ Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of an Octo- and Nonagenerian All-Comer Patient Cohort With Coronary Artery Disease - the Cruz Senior Study
NCT04612179
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stents
NCT01711931
Ultrathin-strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stents With P2Y12 Inhibitor-based Single Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Conventional DAPT for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (ULTIMATE-LM)
NCT05650411
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study population: 2 x 368 (736) patients, who undergo a PCI and are at high risk for bleeding (HBR).
Intervention: Patients are treated according to the randomized regimen at index PCI and at planned staged procedures. Either with the ultrathin stent strut Supraflex Cruz stent to the thin stent strut Ultimaster Tansei stent
DAPT treatment (combination and duration) is according to the Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for Myocardial Revascularization.
Follow-up is scheduled at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post index PCI procedure.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
The primary endpoint Net Adverse Clinical Endpoints (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and bleeding events defined as BARC 3 or 5 at 12 months follow-up after the index PCI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supraflex Cruz stent
Randomization to Supraflex Cruz stent
Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron
percutaneous coronary intervention
Ultimaster Tansei stent
Randomization to Ultimaster Tansei stent
Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron
percutaneous coronary intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supraflex Cruz 60 Micron
percutaneous coronary intervention
Ultimaster Tansei 80 Micron
percutaneous coronary intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients of 18 years and above
* Written or witnessed oral consent to participate in the study
* Native coronary artery lesions eligible for PCI with stents with no restrictions in number of lesions and stents, vessel size or lesion complexity, apart from stent thrombosis.
* Patients at high risk for bleeding according to the HBR ARC criteria: Patients meet the HBR ARC criteria if ≥1 major or ≥2 minor criteria are met.
Major HBR criteria are the following:
* Clinical indication for treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC/NOAC) for at least 12 months
* Severe or end-stage chronic kidney failure (GFR ≤ 30 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin (Hb) level at screening \< 11g/dl or \< 6.8 mmol/l
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion in the past 6 months or at any time, if recurrent
* Moderate or severe baseline true thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<100 \*10\^9/L)
* History of chronic bleeding diathesis, like: leukemia, haemophilia, vitamin K deficiency, Factor V or VII deficiency etc.
* Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
* Active malignancy (other than skin) within the past 12 months
* Spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage ICH (at any time)
* Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage ICH within 12 months
* Presence of a brain arterio-venous malformation (AVM)
* Moderate or severe ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
* Nondeferrable major surgery on DAPT after PCI
* Recent major surgery or major trauma within 30 d before PCI
Minor HBR criteria are the following:
* Age ≥ 75 years
* Moderate chronic kidney disease (GFR \>30 and \<60 ml/min)
* Hemoglobin (Hb) 11-12.9 g/dL / 6.8-8.0 mmol/l for men and 11-11.9 g/dL / 6.8-7.4 mmol/l for women
* Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting the major criterion
* Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 months
* Need for chronic treatment with steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Exclusion Criteria
* Treated with stents other than Supraflex Cruz or Ultimaster within 6 months prior to index procedure
* Treatment of lesions with stent thrombosis
* Treatment of venous or arterial coronary grafts
* Treated for stent thrombosis in 12 months prior to index PCI procedure
* Treated with a bioresorbable scaffold 3 years before index PCI procedure
* Cardiogenic shock at index procedure
* Active SARS-CoV-2 infection or suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection
* Cannot provide written informed consent
* Under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship
* Unable to understand and follow study-related instructions or unable to comply with study protocol
* Active bleeding requiring medical attention (BARC≥2) at index PCI
* Life expectancy less than one year
* Known hypersensitivity or allergy for aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel, cobalt chromium or sirolimus
* Any anticipated PCI after index PCI, unless planned and scheduled at index PCI
* Participation in another stent or drug trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited
INDUSTRY
Pieter C.Smits
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pieter C.Smits
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pieter Smits, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Research Maatschap Cardiologen Rotterdam Zuid
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands
Meander ziekenhuis
Amersfoort, , Netherlands
Rijnstate ziekenhuis
Arnhem, , Netherlands
Tergooi ziekenhuis Blaricum
Blaricum, , Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, , Netherlands
Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis
Dordrecht, , Netherlands
Catherina ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
MCL Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, , Netherlands
St.Antonius ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Maasstadziekenhuis
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Zorgsaam
Terneuzen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Smits PC, Tonino PAL, Hofma SH, van Kuijk JP, Spano F, Al Mafragi A, Pisters R, Polad J, Bogaerts K, Oemrawsingh RM, Paradies V. Comparison of Ultrathin- Versus Thin-Strut Stents in Patients With High Bleeding Risk PCI: Results From the COMPARE 60/80 HBR Trial: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;17(10):e014042. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.014042. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
Capodanno D. Another Coronary Stent for Patients at High Bleeding Risk. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1884-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.028. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL73419.100.20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.