Comparison Between Upgraded '2C3L' vs. PVI Approach for Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT04497376
Last Updated: 2024-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
498 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-27
2024-07-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
FIH of PFBalloon for PVI
NCT07320976
PVI Alone vs PVI and Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PROMPT AF II)
NCT07106970
Clinical Value of Linear Ablation Without Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT05468528
STrategies for Catheter Ablation of peRsistent Atrial Fibrlllation
NCT04428944
The Effect of Pulse Field Ablation on Atrial Mechanics in Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT06557876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Upgraded '2C3L'
Patients randomized to the upgraded '2C3L' arm will first undergo ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EI-VOM) followed by the '2C3L' ablation step which includes bilateral circumferential PV antral ablation and linear ablations across the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus (MI), and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI).
upgraded '2C3L'
Patients randomized to the upgraded '2C3L' arm will first undergo EI-VOM, followed by the '2C3L' ablation step. The details include: (1). EI-VOM procedure: An 8.5-French-long sheath or a steerable long sheath is sent to the coronary sinus (CS) via the femoral vein. A JR4.0 catheter is inserted into the CS to identify the ostium of the VOM. Subsequently, a BMW wire supported by an OTW balloon catheter is advanced into the VOM. The balloon is inflated with 6 to 8 atm in the VOM. A selective venogram of the VOM is obtained by slowly injecting 1 mL of contrast medium. Then, ethanol is slowly injected into the VOM and selective venography of the VOM is repeated. (2) . After EI-VOM, radiofrequency ablation was performed to achieve bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and bidirectional block of mitral isthmus line, roof line, and cavotricuspid isthmus line. (3). Any organized AT observed during the procedure will be targeted as well.
Pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVI)
Patients randomized to the PVI arm will undergo right PV antrum ablation, followed by the left PVA ablation. Radiofrequency should be applied 1 cm proximal to the PV ostia in a wide-area circumferential pattern. Complete PVI will be achieved when all PV potentials within each antrum recorded by the high-density mapping catheter are abolished.
pulmonary vein antral isolation
After reconstructing the left atrial geometry, PVI will be performed (the right PV antrum (PVA) will be ablated first, followed by the left PVA. ) in a wide area circumferential pattern. Complete PVI will be achieved when all PV potentials within each antrum recorded by the high-density mapping catheter are abolished. The endpoint of the circumferential PVA ablation procedure is to achieve electrical bilateral PV isolation, that is, the PV potentials associated with atrial electrical activity cannot be recorded during sinus rhythm or CS pacing (entrance block). A waiting period of at least 20 min (after the last PV is isolated) will be used during which spontaneous PV reconnection will be related. , and tDemonstration of exit block (he by pacing in the PV cannot be and proving the absence of transmitted conduction to capture the atrium) may be performed but is not mandatory. Any organized AT observed during the procedure will be targeted as well.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
upgraded '2C3L'
Patients randomized to the upgraded '2C3L' arm will first undergo EI-VOM, followed by the '2C3L' ablation step. The details include: (1). EI-VOM procedure: An 8.5-French-long sheath or a steerable long sheath is sent to the coronary sinus (CS) via the femoral vein. A JR4.0 catheter is inserted into the CS to identify the ostium of the VOM. Subsequently, a BMW wire supported by an OTW balloon catheter is advanced into the VOM. The balloon is inflated with 6 to 8 atm in the VOM. A selective venogram of the VOM is obtained by slowly injecting 1 mL of contrast medium. Then, ethanol is slowly injected into the VOM and selective venography of the VOM is repeated. (2) . After EI-VOM, radiofrequency ablation was performed to achieve bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and bidirectional block of mitral isthmus line, roof line, and cavotricuspid isthmus line. (3). Any organized AT observed during the procedure will be targeted as well.
pulmonary vein antral isolation
After reconstructing the left atrial geometry, PVI will be performed (the right PV antrum (PVA) will be ablated first, followed by the left PVA. ) in a wide area circumferential pattern. Complete PVI will be achieved when all PV potentials within each antrum recorded by the high-density mapping catheter are abolished. The endpoint of the circumferential PVA ablation procedure is to achieve electrical bilateral PV isolation, that is, the PV potentials associated with atrial electrical activity cannot be recorded during sinus rhythm or CS pacing (entrance block). A waiting period of at least 20 min (after the last PV is isolated) will be used during which spontaneous PV reconnection will be related. , and tDemonstration of exit block (he by pacing in the PV cannot be and proving the absence of transmitted conduction to capture the atrium) may be performed but is not mandatory. Any organized AT observed during the procedure will be targeted as well.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. age between 18 and 80,
2. patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for non-valvular AF,
3. patients with defined as a sustained episode more than 3 months
4. PeAF documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, trans-telephonic monitor or implanted device within 90 days6 months of the ablation procedure,
5. patients experienced symptoms caused by AF and these symptoms include but are not limited to palpitations, presyncope, syncope, fatigue, and shortness of breath,
6. AF refractory to at least one AAD,
7. willingness, ability and commitment to provide informed consent and participate in follow-up evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria
2. patients with AF secondary to an obvious reversible cause,
3. patients with left atrial diameter ≥ 60 mm in the parasternal long axis view,
4. left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30%,
5. patients with triple (aspirin, clopidogrel and OAC) or dual (clopidogrel and OAC) antithrombotic therapy which predispose patients to higher risk of periprocedural bleeding. (e.g., Coronary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)/stenting within the previous 90 days),
6. patients with contraindication to anticoagulation,
7. patients with contraindication to right or left sided heart catheterization,
8. pregnancy,
9. life expectancy less than 1 year (advanced malignant tumor, end stage renal disease, etc.),
10. patients cannot be removed from antiarrhythmic drugs for reasons other than AF.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Heart Health Research Centre
UNKNOWN
The George Institute for Global Health, China
OTHER
The George Institute for Global Health, Australia
OTHER
Fukuoka University
OTHER
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chang sheng Ma
Director of Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caihua Sang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Changsheng Ma, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Jianzeng Dong, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beijing Anzhen Hospital; The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Chenyang Jiang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
Taizhou, Hangzhou, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei, China
Jiangsu Provincial Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital
Dongying, Shandong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Shandong Provincial Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, China
Shanghai Renji Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sang C, Liu Q, Lai Y, Xia S, Jiang R, Li S, Guo Q, Li Q, Gao M, Guo X, Huang L, Liu N, Jiang C, Zuo S, Liu X, Li M, Ge W, Song S, Chen L, Xie S, Zou J, Chen K, Liu X, Hu H, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang Z, Wang C, He L, Jiang C, Tang R, Zhou N, Wang Y, Long D, Du X, Jiang C, Macle L, Dong J, Ma C; PROMPT-AF investigators. Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Optimized Linear Ablation vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF: The PROMPT-AF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Feb 4;333(5):381-389. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24438.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017YFC0908803
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.