Inflammatory Response Following " Pulsed Field Ablation " vs. Radiofrequency Ablation-2

NCT ID: NCT06160076

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-16

Study Completion Date

2025-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in an established treatment strategy for AF. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablation modality which has recently been introduced in clinical practice with the aim of improving PVI efficacy and safety. The aim of this study is to analyse whether PFA generates a lower inflammatory reaction as compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pulmonary vein isolation represents the cornerstone of AF ablation. PFA is a novel non-thermal cardiac ablation modality which is currently studied in clinical trials for the treatment of AF with promising efficacy and safety results. PFA is reported to generate less collateral damage by inducing selective apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, while other structures such as nerves, vessels and oesophageal tissue remain spared. PFA lesions show more organized and homogeneous fibrosis on histopathological study as compared to thermal lesions. In a recent study conducted at Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, PFA was associated with 20% less acute oedema on magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, PFA may generate a reduced inflammatory reaction which could translate into lower early recurrence rates, less post-procedural chest pain and improved clinical outcomes. Data on the systemic inflammation generated by PFA and RFA is still lacking.

The aim of this study is to analyse the inflammatory reaction after PFA and RFA in patients referred for first-time catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. For this purpose, established biomarkers of systemic inflammation (leucocytosis, platelet-monocyte-complexes, inflammatory cytokines) will be determined in blood samples collected from patients treated with either PFA or RFA.

The collection of blood samples will be exclusively performed during routine blood drawing at three time points: at the beginning of the procedure (to define baseline values), at the end of the procedure (to measure acute inflammation) and the day following the procedure (to define inflammation occurring within 24 hours). Clinical signs of inflammation (fever, chest pain, pericardial fluid) and early arrhythmia recurrences will also be assessed the day after the ablation. On a routine 6-month follow-up visit, late arrhythmia recurrences will be registered. In a secondary analysis, the thrombogenic and pro-arrhythmogenic potential of both ablation modalities and the predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for early and late recurrences will be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Inflammation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiofrequency

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per radiofrequency

Radiofrequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using radiofrequency energy

Pulsed electric field

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per pulsed electric field

Pulsed electric field

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using pulsed electric field

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiofrequency

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using radiofrequency energy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pulsed electric field

Patient with atrial fibrillation ablated per catheter using pulsed electric field

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Catheter ablation per radiofrequency Catheter ablation per pulsed electric field

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Patients with paroxysmal AF referred for first-time catheter ablation using PFA or RFA
* Non-opposition to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Persons under judicial protection (guardianship, guardianship) or deprived of freedom
* Prior left atrial ablation
* Prior cardiac surgery comprising incision of the left atrium
* Prior myocardial infarction or stroke in the previous 30 days
* Acute or chronic inflammatory state: active smoking, auto-immune disease, active tumor disease, myocarditis
* Antiplatelet therapy (e.g. aspirine, clopidogrel) within the 7 last days
* Anti-inflammatory treatment (e.g. glucocorticoids, colchicine, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, antibodies) within the 7 last days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre JAÏS, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Haut-Lévèque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUBX 2023/33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.