The Efficacy and the Safety of Vitamin D3 30,000 IU for Loading Dose Schedules

NCT ID: NCT04476511

Last Updated: 2022-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-05

Study Completion Date

2021-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Treatment: A: Slower Loading Group (SLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.

B: Moderate Loading Dose group (MLD): 30.000 IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks, followed by 30.000 IU cholecalciferol every two weeks for four weeks.

Every patients will receive calcium-citrate supplementation if average daily calcium intake does not reach the recommended daily amount.

Setting: two-arms, controlled, randomised, comparative open-label, multicentric clinical trial aimed to assess the comparative efficacy on 25(OH)D elevation and on safety of the two loading dose schedules of 30.000 IU Vitamin D3 oral tablets (administered as "Moderate Loading Dose"or "Slower Loading Dose") combined with an follow-up maintenance period of biweekly administration. The comparative assessment is based on the elevation of 25(OH)D levels due to treatment efficacy from baseline and by the end of the maintenance (biweekly 30.000 IU) period for each treatment groups, and also the ratio of patients in target range (30-50 ng/ml) in order to evaluate the most beneficial "loading dose" schedule. Upon the serum 25(OH)D levels are exceeded the 55ng/ml limits by the end of the loading period the trial subjects should continue with the standard maintenance dose of vitamin D3 for the remaining four weeks of the study. The evaluation of the comparative safety will be done also by controlling the serum and the urinary calcium levels and the registration of adverse drug reaction.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of the orally administered loading dose schedules of vitamin D3 in deficient patients. Efficacy is measured as the elevation of 25(OH)D levels compared to baseline.

Rationale: Oral vitamin D3 is the treatment of choice in vitamin D deficiency. The UK NOS guideline recommended where rapid correction of vitamin D deficiency is required, such as in patients with symptomatic disease or about to start treatment with a potent antiresorptive agent, the recommended treatment regimen is based on fixed loading doses followed by regular maintenance therapy. The loading dose regimen to provide a total of approximately 300,000 IU vitamin D, given either as separate weekly or daily doses over 6 to 10 weeks followed by a maintenance therapy comprising vitamin D in doses equivalent to 800-2000 IU daily in general or up to 4,000 IU daily), given either daily or intermittently at higher doses. (NOS guidelines 2014). Recent research on vitamin D and the widening range of therapeutic applications available for cholecalciferol, which can be classified as both a vitamin and a pro-hormone. Additionally, it was now realized that the Food and Nutrition Board's previously defined Upper Limit (UL) for safe intake at 2,000 IU/day was set far too low and that the physiologic requirement for vitamin D in adults may be as high as 5,000 IU/day, which is less than half of the \>10,000 IU that can be produced endogenously with full-body sun exposure.

In a recent study showed that the safety of doses over 2000 IU/day-4000 IU/day for 3 months resulting in a \~360,000 UI cumulative dose. According to the study results, for the majority of the patients the 4000 IU/day (360,000 UI cumulative dose) was needed to achieve a 25(OH)D serum concentration above 75nmol/L (30 ng/mL), which is otherwise set as the target value by Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline (Holick 2011b).

Another study (Verussio et al 2014) cited shows the safety and efficacy of 50.000 IU/week for 8 weeks (400,000 UI cumulative dose for 8 weeks), followed by 25,000 IU twice a month which was more effective in raising the 25(OH)D level to the target range (of \>30 ng/L) than 25,000 IU twice a month (50,000 IU/ month). In the latter group only 40% of the patients reached the target 25(OH)D levels at 6 months, compared to the 72% in the first group. The study supports efficacy of dosing and safety of the treatment of vitamin D deficiency a 50,000 IU /week loading dose scheme with a 8 weeks cumulative dose of \>400,000 UI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vitamin D Deficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Slower Loading Dose

30.000IU cholecalciferol once weekly for ten weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet containing 30.000IU cholecalciferol

Moderate Loading Dose

30.000IU cholecalciferol twice weekly for five weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

tablet containing 30.000IU cholecalciferol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cholecalciferol

tablet containing 30.000IU cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 years
* 25OHD level is no more than 16 ng/ml
* Postmenopausal state or adequate contraception in female patients
* Willing and able to give legal informed consent for study entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe endocrine or metabolic disease, significant metabolic bone disease (except primary age-related osteoporosis)
* significant obesity (BMI \>36 kg/m2)
* hypercalcemia at screening or within one year (seCa \> 2.60 mmol/l)
* long standing hypercalciuria, kidney stones within 2 years
* sever kidney injury (KDIGO CKD 3 or more)
* chronic disease which significantly affects bone metabolism, vitamin D metabolism or calcium absorption
* significant malabsorption that affects calcium metabolism
* heart failure or angina pectoris
* alcohol or drug abuse
* daily vitamin D intake is more than 1000 IU within 2 months
* suspected or proved pregnancy
* any other symptoms or findings which may interact with the safety of the study drug, evaluated by investigator
* participating in other clinical trial within 3 months of study entry
* planned journey to geographic location with high natural UV-B exposition for mor than 4 days during the study or regular (more than 2 times per month) artificial UV-B exposition (eg. sun parlor)
* Taking prohibited medication:
* glycosides
* magnesium containing medications (eg. antacids)
* cholestyramine and other ion exchange resins, orlistat
* thiazide type diuretics
* microsomal enzyme inductors (eg. anticonvulsants, sedatives)
* corticosteroids
* phosphates
* laxatives
* medications decreasing lipid absorption
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pharma Patent Kft.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Semmelweis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Istvan Takacs

M.D., DSc., Director of Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Istvan Takacs, MD, PhD, DSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Semmelweis University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Semmelweis University - Dept. of Medicine and Oncology

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Uno Medical Trials Kft.

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Central Hospital of the Hungarian Homeland Defence Forces

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Szalay János Outpatient Clinic

Hajdúnánás, , Hungary

Site Status

Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Jutrix Healthcare Ltd.

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Rub-Int Health Center

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hungary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-000508-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PAT17-LOADS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimizing Vitamin D in the Elderly
NCT01554241 COMPLETED NA
25-Hydroxyvitamin D Pharmacokinetic Study
NCT03401541 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1