Tenodesis vs. Self-locking Tenotomy in Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT04468906
Last Updated: 2024-05-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2024-05-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Findings in Patients Treated Surgically for Biceps Long Head Injury
NCT06483256
Treatment Of Supracondylar Fractures Closed Reduction And Circular Ring External Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation
NCT02196311
Predictive Factors for the Results of Epiphysiodesis in Limb Length Discrepancy
NCT04367753
Arthroscopic vs. Open Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Delayed/Nonunion
NCT05574582
Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong
NCT03724773
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The optimal management of LHBT lesions remains controversial, with surgeons typically treating younger patients with tenodesis and older patients with tenotomy. Previous RCTs have failed to discern a clinical difference between tenodesis and tenotomy, apart from the reduced incidence of Popeye deformity in the tenodesis cohorts. However, all previous literature has utilized the traditional biceps tenotomy technique of transecting the tendon just lateral to its insertion on the superior labrum. This results in a narrow tendon stump that usually slips through the transverse humeral ligament and retracts down the arm, resulting in the aforementioned deformity. A newer tenotomy technique, termed the self-locking tenotomy, consists of preserving the attachment of the LHBT on the superior labrum and instead releasing the superior labrum off the glenoid from the 11 o'clock to 1 o'clock positions. As a result, the residual LHBT stump is broad and "T-shaped", which has a lower incidence of retracting down the arm. Using this technique, LHBT tenotomy has been shown to result in similar rates of Popeye deformity as the tenodesis in a number of recent case series.
This will be a single-center randomized controlled trial. The study is comparing biceps tenodesis and self-locking tenotomy in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery for lesions involving the LHBT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Biceps self-locking "T" tenotomy
Self-locking "T" Tenotomy
Self-locking "T" Tenotomy describes the surgical procedure that will be performed to treat LHBT lesions.
Biceps tenodesis (control)
Biceps Tenodesis
Biceps tenodesis describes the surgical procedure that will be performed to treat LHBT lesions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biceps Tenodesis
Biceps tenodesis describes the surgical procedure that will be performed to treat LHBT lesions.
Self-locking "T" Tenotomy
Self-locking "T" Tenotomy describes the surgical procedure that will be performed to treat LHBT lesions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 40-80
* Ability to comply with a standardized postoperative protocol
* Willing and able to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant patient
* Age \<40 years
* Previous shoulder surgery
* Unable to speak English or perform informed consent
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NYU Langone Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laith Jazrawi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NYU Langone Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-01026
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.