Meniscus Repair With Simultaneous ACL Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes,Failure Rates And Subsequent Processing

NCT ID: NCT04455516

Last Updated: 2020-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

165 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-16

Study Completion Date

2020-05-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our study has explored the causes of failure of meniscus repair and investigated the clinical effects of partial meniscectomy when meniscus repair failed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Meniscus repair performed during ACL reconstruction may fail and the subsequent treatment includes revision meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy.

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and explore the causes of failure of meniscus repair.

Methods: From May 2013 to July 2018, the clinical data of 165 patients who were treated with meniscus surgery and simultaneous ACL reconstruction by the same doctor, including 69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group), were retrospectively analyzed. The 69 patients of the repair group were divided into the nonfailure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect. The average follow-up period was 38 (±10.5) months. Postoperative outcomes of the repair group and the partial meniscectomy group were compared. General conditions and postoperative outcomes of the failure group and the nonfailure group were compared. Seven patients in the failure group who underwent second arthroscopy were followed up for 30 (±17.4) months, and their postoperative outcomes were summarized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

The ACL Rupture Meniscus Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

repair group

The first operation in these patients was meniscus repair

Meniscus repair; partial meniscectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group), were retrospectively analyzed. The 69 patients of the repair group were divided into the nonfailure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect.

nonfailure group

These patients had a successful first operation

Meniscus repair; partial meniscectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group), were retrospectively analyzed. The 69 patients of the repair group were divided into the nonfailure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect.

failure group

In these patients, the first meniscus repair operation failed

Meniscus repair; partial meniscectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group), were retrospectively analyzed. The 69 patients of the repair group were divided into the nonfailure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meniscus repair; partial meniscectomy

69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group), were retrospectively analyzed. The 69 patients of the repair group were divided into the nonfailure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. patients with intraoperatively confirmed ACL rupture combined with medial, lateral, or medial and lateral meniscal injury;
2. age \<60 years
3. no history of previous ipsilateral knee meniscal injury.

Exclusion Criteria

1. ACL rupture associated with fracture, collateral ligament injury, or complex ligament injury;
2. a history of knee surgery;
3. a significant degree of osteoarthritis.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Third Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M2020024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.