Pelvic Floor Magnetic Stimulation in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

NCT ID: NCT04450511

Last Updated: 2022-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2021-11-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In clinical practice, Bladder Training (BT) and Magnetic stimulation (MS) are frequently used together in the treatment of women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). Up to our knowledge, there is no study evaluating the combined effect of magnetic stimulation and bladder training in women with idiopathic OAB in the literature. Moreover, there is no recommendation on conservative treatment combinations in the guidelines due to insufficient data. At this stage, studies are needed to determine whether it will be effective to use MS in combination with other conservative treatment options. In addition, in the light of our clinical experience, we think that this issue is still open for research. In our study, adding MS to BT in women with idiopathic OAB is thought to contribute additionally to the efficacy of treatment with BT.

Our study is the first prospective randomized controlled trial that compares the efficacy of BT and BT plus MS in women with idiopathic OAB. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MS added to BT on incontinence-related QoL and clinical parameters in women with idiopathic OAB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospectively randomized, controlled trial. The trial is held at Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit of University Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department between September 2020 and November 2021. The local ethics committee approve the study (approval no: 60116787-020/37878). Patients are informed about the purpose and contents of the study and all women give written consent to participate.

By using a random number generator, all patients which included the study were randomized into two groups as follows: The Group 1 received BT program alone, the Group 2 received BT plus MS.

Group 1: Bladder Training (BT) - Control group All women were informed about BT for 30 minutes. Then it was given as a written brochure to be implemented as a home program.

BT, consisting of four stages, did not contain any pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training programs in two groups.

Group 2: BT plus MS Patients are told to sit on the chair with a magnetic coil below the chair. When a volume conductor is inserted by this magnetic field, an eddy current flow is generated. This eddy current stimulates nerve or muscle of the pelvic floor. To apply MS, the device was set to generate its maximum stimuli, with a stimulation pulse width of 200 μs and a stimulation repetition cycle of 10 Hz in accordance with the literature (10,13-15). When setting the device at each treatment session, patients were interviewed so that they received stimuli at the maximum stimulation intensity (maximum tolerable stimulation intensity) (10). MS was applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks. MS sessions were performed by other physician.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urge Incontinence Episodes After the Magnetic Stimulation Added to Bladder Training in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1: Bladder Training (BT)

BT, consisting of four stages, did not contain any PFM training programs in all groups. In these stages, including urgency suppression strategies, it was aimed to delay urination, to inhibit detrusor contraction and to prevent urgency; by squeezing the PFM several times in a row (women were encouraged to pause/stop their work, sit down if possible, relax the entire body and squeeze PFM repeatedly), breathing deeply, giving their attention to another job for a while and self-motivating (I can do it, I can check the urination, etc.).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bladder Training (BT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Bladder Training (BT)

Group 2: Bladder Training+Magnetic Stimulation

Patients are told to sit on the chair with a magnetic coil below the chair. When a volume conductor is inserted by this magnetic field, an eddy current flow is generated. This eddy current stimulates nerve or muscle of the pelvic floor. To apply MS, the device was set to generate its maximum stimuli, with a stimulation pulse width of 200 μs and a stimulation repetition cycle of 10 Hz in accordance with the literature. When setting the device at each treatment session, patients were interviewed so that they received stimuli at the maximum stimulation intensity (maximum tolerable stimulation intensity) .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetic stimulation -Armchair type (MS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

MS was applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks.

Bladder Training (BT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Bladder Training (BT)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnetic stimulation -Armchair type (MS)

MS was applied two days a week, 20 minutes a day, a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bladder Training (BT)

Bladder Training (BT)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Extracorporeal magnetic stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Women over the age of 18 with clinical diagnosis of idiopathic OAB
2. Urodynamically confirmed detrusor overactivity (the presence of detrusor contractions in the filling phase of saline cystometry)
3. Not tolerated or unresponsive to antimuscarinics and discontinued at least 4 weeks
4. Able to give written, informed consent
5. Able to understand the procedures, advantages and possible side effects
6. Willing and able to complete the voiding diary and QoL questionnaire
7. The strength of PFM 3/5 and more

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of BT, MS therapy
2. Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study
3. Current vulvovaginitis or urinary tract infections or malignancy
4. More than stage 2 according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification
5. Cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, coronary artery stent
6. Ongoing treatment for arrhythmia
7. Lower abdominal pain or dysmenorrhea yet to be diagnosed
8. Electronic device or metallic implant applied to areas between the lumbar region and lower extremities
9. Previous urogynecological surgery within 3 months
10. Ongoing surgical treatment or treatment with implantable devices for urinary incontinence or use of intrauterine copper devices
11. Neurogenic bladder, signs of neurologic abnormalities at objective examination; history of the peripheral or central neurologic pathology
12. Ultrasonographic evidence of post voiding residual volume more than 100 ml
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pamukkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Necmettin Yildiz

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pamukkale University

Denizli, Kınıklı, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

60116787-020/37878

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.