Proximal Priority Versus Distal Priority Robotic Priming Effects in Patients With Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04446273

Last Updated: 2024-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-03

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single-blind randomized comparative efficacy study involving 54-72 participants with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized into proximal priority robotic group or distal priority robotic group and receive 18 intervention sessions (90 min/d, 3 d/wk for 6 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale, Medical Research Council Scale, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Method will be used to examine the comparative efficacy and predictors of outcome, respectively, after intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background. The sequence of establishing proximal stability or function before facilitation of the distal body part has long been recognized in stroke rehabilitation practice but lacks scientific evidence. This study plans to examine the effects of proximal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training (PRI) and distal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training (DRI).

Methods. This is a single-blind randomized comparative efficacy study involving 54-72 participants with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized into PRI or DRI groups and receive 18 intervention sessions (90 min/d, 3 d/wk for 6 weeks). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale, Medical Research Council Scale, Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, and Wolf Motor Function Test will be administered at baseline, after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector Method will be used to examine the comparative efficacy and predictors of outcome, respectively, after PRI and DRI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized into the proximal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training or the distal priority robotic priming and impairment-oriented training groups and receive 18 intervention sessions
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Initial and outcome assessments will be administered by a well-trained and certified occupational therapist who is blinded to the group assignment, study hypotheses, and intervention of the patients.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PRI group

The PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The PRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bi-Manu-Track

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PRI and DRI protocol provide robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist). The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).In every session of robotic training, the patient will practice bilateral passive range of motion exercise, in which affected upper extremity is assisted by the unaffected side, and bilateral active range of motion exercise. Robotic training will be followed by impairment-oriented training.

DRI group

The PRI and DRI groups will receive an equal amount of treatment time, comprising 1.5 hours per day, 3 days per week, for 6 weeks. The DRI protocol provides robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bi-Manu-Track

Intervention Type DEVICE

The PRI and DRI protocol provide robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist). The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).In every session of robotic training, the patient will practice bilateral passive range of motion exercise, in which affected upper extremity is assisted by the unaffected side, and bilateral active range of motion exercise. Robotic training will be followed by impairment-oriented training.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bi-Manu-Track

The PRI and DRI protocol provide robotic training for 45 minutes and impairment-oriented training for 45 minutes. The PRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm) and then the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist). The DRI group will start from the Bi-Manu-Track distal mode (i.e., wrist) and then the Bi-Manu-Track proximal mode (i.e., forearm).In every session of robotic training, the patient will practice bilateral passive range of motion exercise, in which affected upper extremity is assisted by the unaffected side, and bilateral active range of motion exercise. Robotic training will be followed by impairment-oriented training.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

impairment-oriented training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

* The inclusion criteria are age between 20 and 75 years old, more than 3 months after the onset of a first unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, moderate to severe UE motor impairment (i.e., total UE score of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment \[FMA\] score between 18 and 56), no severe spasticity in any joints of the affected arm (modified Ashworth Scale score \<3 in any of the affected shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers), able to follow instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination total score \>24), no UE fractures in the past 3 months, and not simultaneously participating in other medication or rehabilitation studies.

Exclusion Criteria:

* The exclusion criteria are other neurologic, neuromuscular, or orthopedic disease, such as epilepsy, or severe health or physical conditions that might impede participation in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Keh-chung Lin, ScD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fongyuan Hospital

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kehchung Lin, ScD

Role: CONTACT

+886233668180

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Keh-chung Lin

Role: primary

Keh-chung Lin, ScD

Role: primary

886 233668180

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee YC, Li YC, Lin KC, Chen CL, Wu YH, Kuo C, Yeh YP, Liu TX. Effects of proximal priority and distal priority robotic priming techniques with impairment-oriented training of upper limb functions in patients with chronic stroke: study protocol for a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05561-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34496938 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202004105RINB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.