Identification of the UDI-6 and the IIQ-7 Cutoff Scores in Urinary Incontinent Women

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-01

Study Completion Date

2016-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) and The International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ-SF) Short Form are used to diagnose individuals with urinary incontinence (UI) and to assess the impact of the dysfunction on patient quality of life. While ICIQ-SF has fixed cutoff values - UDI-6 and IIQ-7 do not. We aimed to find the cutoff scores for UDI-6 and IIQ-7 in women with UI.

Methods The study involved 205 women aged between 31 and 83 years - 155 with, and 50 without UI symptoms. All participants completed all three questionnaires: ICIQ-SF, UDI-6 and IIQ-7. Patients were categorized according to their ICIQ-SF scores, as symptomatic ICIQ-SF ≥6 (n=134) and asymptomatic ICIQ \< 6 (n=60). The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to test how well UDI-6 allowed a discrimination between patients suffering from UI and those who do not. AUC (Area under Curve) statistic was calculated to measure the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 Total Score efficiency.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Identifying Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

NCT03005977

Stress Urinary Incontinence Pelvic Organ Prolapse

COMPLETED NA

Evident, Occult and no Demonstrated USI and UDS Findings in Women With ≥Stage II Cystocele

NCT03613311

Urodynamic Stress Incontinence in Severe Cystocele Women

COMPLETED

To Use the Combined Version of ICIQ-SF and Quality of Life Scale in Mixed Urinary Incontinence

NCT05948397

Incontinence, Urge Incontinence Stress Quality of Life

UNKNOWN

Prevalence Rates of USI, BO, DO and Their Clinical and Urodynamic Findings in Women With ≥Stage II Cystocele

NCT03613350

Lower Urinary Tract Symptom in Severe Cystocele Women

COMPLETED

Effectiveness of a Hip Abductor Training in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT05635175

Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) and The International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ-SF) Short Form are used to diagnose individuals with urinary incontinence (UI) and to assess the impact of the dysfunction on patient quality of life. While ICIQ-SF has fixed cutoff values - UDI-6 and IIQ-7 do not. We aimed to find the cutoff scores for UDI-6 and IIQ-7 in women with UI.

Methods The study involved 205 women aged between 31 and 83 years - 155 with, and 50 without UI symptoms. All participants completed all three questionnaires: ICIQ-SF, UDI-6 and IIQ-7. Patients were categorized according to their ICIQ-SF scores, as symptomatic ICIQ-SF ≥6 (n=134) and asymptomatic ICIQ \< 6 (n=60). The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to test how well UDI-6 allowed a discrimination between patients suffering from UI and those who do not. AUC (Area under Curve) statistic was calculated to measure the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 Total Score efficiency.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life Urinary Incontinence,Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.