Posture in Abdominopelvic Training in Women SUI

NCT ID: NCT03727945

Last Updated: 2018-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Measure effect of postural correction in abdominopelvic exercises on the improvement of the quality of life in patients with SUI. 42 women aged between 46-75 with SUI and stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence. There were randomly assigned two groups of different treatment.

Quality of life was measured by questionnaires: Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-IU-SF) and King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) global punctuation and incontinence impact. Treatment satisfaction was measured by VAS scale.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study was compare the effect of postural correction in abdominopelvic exercises on the improvement of the quality of life in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Was a randomized 2-treatment parallel design study. The sample consist in 42 women aged between 46-75 with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (IUM). They were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1 (n=21) who received abdomino-pelvic training, and Group 2(n=21) who received the above treatment, guidelines about postural correction.

Both groups received 12 treatment sessions in first session information regarding clinical and demographical aspects will be collected.

To evaluate results of postural correction combined with abdominopelvic exercise women was assessed:at initial session, post- intervention and 3 months post-intervention treatment.Quality of life was measured by spanish validation questionnaires: International Continence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-IU-SF) and King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) global punctuation and incontinence impact. Treatment satisfaction was measured by Visual analogic scale (VAS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Female Stress Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

2 aleatorized groups; control group (n=21) and intervention group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Urolog was not involved in physiotherapy treatment, randomised patients previous of treatment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

abdominopelvic exercise and posture

N=21 received supervised physiotherapy abdominopelvic exercise previous postural correction.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

abdominopelvic exercise and posture

Intervention Type OTHER

n=21 women received supervised abdominopelvic exercise with previous postural correction. During 12 sessions a specialized physiotherapist supervised to realization of progressive abdominopelvic exercises, previous explain postural correction pelvis, cervical and dorsal zone.

abdominopelvic exercise

N=21 received supervised physiotherapy abdominopelvic exercise.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

abdominopelvic exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

n=21 women received supervised abdominopelvic exercise. During 12 sessions a specialized physiotherapist supervised to realization of progressive abdominopelvic exercises.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

abdominopelvic exercise and posture

n=21 women received supervised abdominopelvic exercise with previous postural correction. During 12 sessions a specialized physiotherapist supervised to realization of progressive abdominopelvic exercises, previous explain postural correction pelvis, cervical and dorsal zone.

Intervention Type OTHER

abdominopelvic exercise

n=21 women received supervised abdominopelvic exercise. During 12 sessions a specialized physiotherapist supervised to realization of progressive abdominopelvic exercises.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* SUI or stress-predominant mixed UI
* diagnosed via clinical assessment and urodynamic study
* Estrogenic deficit.: perimenopause, menopause, postmenopause

Exclusion Criteria

* grade 3-4 prolapse,
* functional alterations (Barthel Scale \> 85 points),
* neurological or cognitive alterations (mini mental examination \> 24 points)
* other predominant type of urinary incontinence.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Valencia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laura Fuentes Aparicio

PhD Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Salinas Casado J, Díaz Rodríguez A, Brenes Bermúdez F, Cancelo Hidalgo MJ, Cuenllas Díaz A, Verdejo Bravo C. Prevalencia de la incontinencia urinaria en España. UROD A. 2010; 23 (1): 52-66. 2. Aguilar-Navarro SG, Incontinencia urinaria en el adulto mayor. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2007; 15 (1): 51-56. 3. Zunzunegui Pastor MV, Rodríguez Laso A, García de Yébenes MJ, Aguilar Conesa M.D, Lázaro y de Mercado P y Otero Puime A. Prevalencia de la incontinencia urinaria y factores asociados en varones y mujeres de más de 65 años. Aten Primaria. 2003; 32 (6): 337-342. 4. Grosse D, Sengler J. Reeducación del periné fisioterapia en las incontinencias urinarias. Ed Masson. 2001. 5. Robles JE (editor). I Curso de formación en incontinencia urinaria. Pamplona: Newbook ediciones. 2001. 6. Guía clínica sobre la incontinencia urinaria. Schroder A, Abrams P. Andersson KE, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, Hampel C, Neisius A, Tubaro A, Thuroff JW. European Association of Urology. 2010. 7. Lacima G, Espuña M. Patología del suelo pélvico. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 31 (9): 587-595. 8. Sapsford R. The pelvic floor. A clinical model for function and rehabilitation. Physiotherapy. 2001; 87 (12): 620-630.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H1410616852782,

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.