Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Incontinence in Older Women.

NCT ID: NCT00222248

Last Updated: 2021-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-03-03

Study Completion Date

2006-03-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the effect of pelvic floor muscle training in women aged 70 years and over, who have proven stress urinary incontinence. The hypotheses to be tested are:

1. That pelvic floor muscle training is effective in relief of symptoms of stress urinary incontinence as measured by a greater reduction in the number of episodes of incontinence, quantity of urine lost and improvement of quality of life.
2. That women who undertake pelvic floor muscle training will show greater improvement of pelvic floor muscle function than women who have behavioural (bladder) training, as measured by real time transabdominal ultrasound.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Urinary incontinence is associated with significant personal stress, shame and social stigma and affects around one-third of women over 60 years of age. It restricts the amount of physical activity and can lead to social isolation and poor health. Pelvic floor muscle re-education by physiotherapists is the most commonly recommended method of conservative management. Although a recent Cochrane review concluded that it was an effective treatment for women with stress and mixed incontinence, there is still no strong evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention in elderly women. It has also been suggested that bladder training alone is equally effective in patients with stress urinary incontinence, urge and mixed incontinence. This is contrary to current clinical experience. It is therefore important to distinguish the relative effectiveness of these interventions used in isolation in order to ensure that urinary incontinence is managed in the most effective and efficient way.

Comparisons: pelvic floor muscle training group and bladder training.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and 5 months during the intervention period. Both groups will then continue with their home program for a further 7 months until their final assessment (Assessment 5).

Outcome measures will include: volume of urine lost during a stress test, completion of accident diaries, Degree of 'bother', quality of life using the Kings Health Questionnaire, and assessment of pelvic floor function using real time transabdominal diagnostic ultrasound.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pelvic floor muscle training

Weekly group session of education and exercise to music incorporating pelvic floor muscle training incorporating motor control, strength, endurance, power and functional training in a variety of different positions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pelvic floor muscle training and bladder training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Bladder training

Weekly group session of education regarding deferral techniques, timed voiding parameters and gentle exercise to music.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pelvic floor muscle training and bladder training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pelvic floor muscle training and bladder training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Community-dwelling women aged over 65 years
* urodynamically proven stress incontinence
* Medically stable

Exclusion Criteria

* Already receiving physiotherapy intervention
* Neurogenic incontinence
* Cannot comply with training program
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Melbourne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mary Galea

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary P Galea, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Melbourne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Austin Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sherburn M, Bird M, Carey M, Bo K, Galea MP. Incontinence improves in older women after intensive pelvic floor muscle training: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):317-24. doi: 10.1002/nau.20968. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21284022 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

251632

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.