Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
481 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-28
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevalence Rates of USI, BO, DO and Their Clinical and Urodynamic Findings in Women With ≥Stage II Cystocele
NCT03613350
Comparisons of Urodynamic, Bladder Diary, Quality of Life Parameters Between OAB-wet and OAB-dry Female Patients
NCT03560778
Evident, Occult and no Demonstrated USI and UDS Findings in Women With ≥Stage II Cystocele
NCT03613311
Bladder Diary for Female Storage LUTS
NCT06222515
Comparisons of Phasic and Terminal DO
NCT06793046
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study design, materials and methods Between July 2009 and December 2023, medical records, including urodynamic data, bladder dairy data and questionnaires, including patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC), urgency severity scale (USS), overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6), incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7), and King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), of all women with USI were reviewed to see if there was any involuntary leakage of urine during stress urethral pressure measurement.
STATA software was used for statistical analysis. The Wilcoxon rank sum test or the Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. A p \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Linear regression analysis was also performed with an adjustment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) to elucidate the real clinical and urodynamic associations about the leak during stress urethral pressure measurement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Positive sUPP
Involuntary urine leak during cough stress test in urethral pressure profile
No interventions assigned to this group
Negative sUPP
No urine leak during cough stress test in urethral pressure profile
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women with lower urinary tract symptoms
* Received urodynamic stress incontinence and was diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence
Exclusion Criteria
* With chronic pelvic inflammatory disease
20 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ho-Hsiung Lin, M.D. Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wu PC, Hsiao SM, Lin HH. Prevalence and predictors of nocturnal polyuria in females with overactive bladder syndrome. World J Urol. 2022 Feb;40(2):519-527. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03865-5. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
Hsiao SM, Wu PC, Chang TC, Chen CH, Lin HH. Urodynamic and Bladder Diary Factors Predict Overactive Bladder-wet in Women: A Comparison With Overactive Bladder-dry. Int Neurourol J. 2019 Mar;23(1):69-74. doi: 10.5213/inj.1836212.106. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
Hsiao SM, Hsiao CF, Chen CH, Chang TC, Wu WY, Lin HH. Evaluation of bladder diary parameters based on correlation with the volume at strong desire to void in filling cystometry. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069946. Print 2013.
Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, Dickinson T, Hashim H. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jun;36(5):1243-1260. doi: 10.1002/nau.23124. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202406048RINC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.