Comparisons of Urodynamic, Bladder Diary, Quality of Life Parameters Between OAB-wet and OAB-dry Female Patients

NCT ID: NCT03560778

Last Updated: 2018-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

623 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-05

Study Completion Date

2018-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A small bladder capacity and more frequent urgency episodes were predictors of OAB-wet, and the above findings might indicate that OAB-wet and OAB-dry are a continuum of OAB. Older age, high maximum flow rate, high detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate and the presence of urodynamic stress incontinence were also independent predictors for OAB-wet, and the above might indicate that OAB-wet and OAB-dry have at least partly different underlying pathophysiologies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aims: To identify factors predicting the presence of OAB-wet and to further derive the underlying pathophysiology in OAB-wet vs. OAB-dry.

Methods: Between September 2007 and September 2013, the medical records of women with OAB who completed a 3-day bladder diary and underwent urodynamic studies in a tertiary referral center will be reviewed. OAB-wet will be diagnosed in patients who complained of at least one episode of urgency incontinence in the previous month; otherwise, OAB-dry is diagnosed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis will be used to predict the presence of OAB-wet.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The diagnosis of overactive bladder disease
2. Female patient of more than 20 year-old

Exclusion Criteria

1. Dominant symptoms with stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
2. Regular urethral catheterization or intermittent self-catheterization
3. Urinary tract infection or chronic inflammation in the previous 2 weeks
4. Bladder calculus
5. A history of pelvic radiotherapy
6. A preexisting malignant pelvic tumor.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201404012RINC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Overactive Bladder Syndrome and Hypopressive Exercise
NCT06780657 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Q-tip Test and Urodynamic Study
NCT03256565 COMPLETED