COVID19 Versus H1N1: Radiological Challenge During Next Influenza Season Rising

NCT ID: NCT04433039

Last Updated: 2020-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-22

Study Completion Date

2020-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Till the moment of editing this paperwork, WHO announced that there is no specific drugs or vaccines for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19. Additionally during the global gradual unlocking of community restrictions, WHO warned form another wave of the disease during the next few months. So clinicians and radiologists during this second wave would face great challenges in differentiation between COVID-19 and other virulent influenza viruses, mainly H1N1.

Objective: to establish comparative radiological study between COVID19 and H1N1 to find differentiating criteria that would help during their expected clinico-laboratory and radiological overlap in next Influenza season.

Material and methods: Retrospective study was including 130 patients; 65 COVID-19 patients and 65 H1N1 patients. HRCT findings to be analyzed by three expert consultant radiologists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A. Study population and medical records review:

Inclusion criteria: 65 COVID-19 and 65 H1N1 patients to be enrolled. Exclusion criteria: (1) Degraded quality of CT scans due to patient unavoidable tachypnea with respiratory motion artifacts. (2) Unremarkable CT scans were also excluded. (3) Past history of large airway disease, asthma, COPD or bronchiectasis. (4) Patients with secondary bacterial infection.

B. CT scanning and parameters:

CT examinations conducted using multiple MDCT machines including: GE LightSpeed Plus 4 slice CT scanner (USA), Philips Brilliant-16 (USA), Siemens SOMATOM Emotion 16 and Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 64 (Germany), Toshiba Aquilion 64 and Toshiba Aquilion CXL/CX 128 (USA).

CT Scanning parameters : Slice thickness: 1 - 1.25 mm. Volumetric HRCT table speed with least cycles of breath holds as possible. Tube rotation: 0.6-0.9 second. Detector Collimation 1 mm. Helical mode (volumetric HRCT). kVp and mA per slice: 120 - 130 kVp and 200-400 mA, according to the type of MSCT machine used, the weight of the patient and the clinical indication.

C. CT analysis:

CT images to be assessed by three consultant radiologists (having long time experience in chest imaging). Image analysis in axial, sagittal and coronal planes done using both maximum intensity projection (MIP) and minimum intensity projection (Min-IP) reconstructions. The following CT features to be compared between each pathological process:

A. Site of the pathology: unilateral or bilateral - focal, multi-focal or diffuse.

B. Mosaic pattern; including ground glass opacities (GGO), mosaic perfusion, air trapping and "head cheese pattern".

C. Reticular pattern; including interlobular septal thickening, "crazy paving pattern", bronchial wall thickening, mucous plugging, traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis and honeycombing.

D. Nodular pattern; including GG nodules and solid nodules; including solid nodules with "halo sign" and tree in bud nodules.

E. Relevant CT findings: including pleural, pericardial and nodal lesions.

D. Statistical analysis:

The prevalence of HRCT findings estimated as the percentage of patients showing each criteria or abnormality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COVID

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with COVID-19 or H1N1

Exclusion Criteria

(1) Degraded quality of CT scans due to patient unavoidable tachypnea with respiratory motion artifacts. (2) Unremarkable CT scans were also excluded. (3) Past history of large airway disease, asthma, COPD or bronchiectasis. (4) Patients with secondary bacterial infection.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Samir

Lecturer of radio-diagnosis

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmed Samir, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Radio-diagnosis.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB (00012098), SN (0304669)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Survey of COVID-19 Infection
NCT05706064 COMPLETED