Predictors of COVID-19 Infection and Disease Progression
NCT ID: NCT04484597
Last Updated: 2020-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-03-15
2020-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prognostic Significance of COVID-19 MSCT Chest Findings on Short Term Disease Progression
NCT05235373
MSCT Chest in Suspected COVID-19 Patients
NCT04492865
Markers of Severity (CD177,S100A8 &S100A12) in Sever Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2(SARS-COV-2) Patients
NCT05201625
Independent Predictors on Clinical Outcomes in SARS-CoV2 Patients
NCT05162534
The Clinical Manifestations of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Coronavirus 2( SARS-Cov-2 ); Not Only Pulmonary
NCT05046509
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although testing is critical, clinical judgement is the first mean to evaluate patients for COVID-19. Ancillary Diagnostic Tests and Chest imaging are also important tools before proceeding to the PCR testing. However, important gaps remain in screening asymptomatic persons in the incubation phase, as well as in the accurate determination of live viral shedding during convalescence to inform decisions to end isolation. The main objectives of the study: To set an evidence-based protocol with some criteria and procedures to reach - as accurate as possible - diagnosis without compromising the limited available resources. Such protocol shall make full use of the three main traditional pillars: Clinical picture, Ancillary Diagnostic Tests and Chest imaging before proceeding to the PCR testing:
1. Clinical Picture: Symptomatic COVID-19 presents with a recognizable clinical syndrome that is predictable prior to testing. Clinical judgement remains important, particularly when interpreting negative test results;
2. Biomarkers Associated with COVID-19 Patients: The most common laboratory features reported in patients with COVID-19 include: • Decreased albumin; • Elevated C-reactive protein ; • Elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels ; and • Lymphopenia .
3. Other biomarkers that have been reported include increased erythrocyte sedimentation rates; elevated aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and creatine kinase levels, leukopenia, leukocytosis, increased bilirubin and creatinine levels. No biomarker or combination of biomarkers currently exists that is sensitive or specific enough to establish a diagnosis of COVID-19, or to pragmatically predict its clinical course.
4. Radiographic Tests: Many centers have evaluated the utility of chest imaging for diagnosis: • On chest radiography, bilateral pneumonia is the most frequently reported feature (range,11.8% to 100%) and is more common than a unilateral focus; • Computed tomography is regarded as more sensitive than radiography, with several cohort studies reporting that most patients (77.8% to 100%) had ground glass opacities. Other features commonly reported with COVID-19 on chest computed tomography include a peripheral distribution, fine reticular opacities, and vascular thickening. Compared with serial nasopharyngeal sampling, chest computed tomography may be more sensitive than an RT-PCR test at a single time point for the diagnosis of COVID-19. In addition, artificial intelligence may help distinguish COVID-19 from other etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia. However, these findings are not completely specific to COVID-19 and do not exclude a co-infection or an alternative diagnosis.
CPR: Who Should Be Tested? The current situation exemplifies the challenge of how to best utilize testing during outbreaks of novel pathogens. The initial testing criteria were too narrow to monitor and control the spread of the disease, but the sudden pivot to a far broader testing approach, even as capacity remains limited, may be an overcorrection. As of March 4, CDC discontinued specific guidance and recommends that "clinicians should use their judgment to determine if a patient has signs and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and whether the patient should be tested," advising that "decisions on which patients receive testing should be based on the local epidemiology of COVID-19, as well as the clinical course of illness." High priorities for testing include patients with serious, unexplained respiratory illness and contacts of known cases, Methods: It is a comparative study between tests to diagnose COVID-19. In developed countries (in which Egypt is one of them) PCR is high cost. Though much of cases escape Diagnosis and clinician depend on clinical picture only. This study would allow to find what degree of dependence on other tests. In this study, 100 cases positive COVID-19 by PCR will be analyzed and tested for other ancillary tests and CT chest to compare them and find out which is the most sensitive in both moderate and severe clinical condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rt PCR
positive COVID-19 by PCR and tested for other ancillary tests and CT chest to compare them and analyse which is the most sensitive in both moderate and severe clinical condition
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
4 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Port Said University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof. Refat Sadeq
Port Said, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Prof. Refat Sadeq
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.