Early Oral Feeding vs Traditional Post-operative Care In Emergency Abdominal Surgeries

NCT ID: NCT04431037

Last Updated: 2020-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-13

Study Completion Date

2019-12-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been widely studied in elective abdominal surgeries and have shown better outcomes. However the utility of these protocols in emergency abdominal surgeries has not been widely investigated.

OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of application of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcers repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.

METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied.

KEY WORDS: Perforated duodenal ulcer, ERAS protocol, randomized controlled trial, duodenal repair site leak, length of hospital stay, VAS score, post-operative ileus

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Surgical Unit 1 BBH from August 2018 to December 2019 with a total sample size of 36 patients with the diagnosis of perforated duodenal ulcer. Patients were randomly divided in two groups. Group A consisted of early oral feeding group and group B consisted of traditional postoperative care group. Outcome results studied were the length of hospital stay, duodenal repair site leak, severity of pain (VAS score) and duration of post-operative ileus. Results were analysed on SPSS version 20 and chi-square and independent t-test were applied.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Patients admitted in the emergency department were randomly assigned into treatment group or control group in postoperative period.Neither the researcher nor the patient were aware of the patient allocation.Patients were management by the oncall surgical team irrespective of the researcher.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early oral feeding group(A)

Patients admitted in the HDU postoperatively.NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early oral feeding/Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Early oral feeding refers to NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.

Traditional postoperative care group(B)

Patients in this group were managed traditionally

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early oral feeding/Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols

Early oral feeding refers to NG tube and foley's catheter removed within 12 hours and patients allowed oral sips on day 1 with gradual shift to liquid diet after 12 hrs and semisolid food started after 24 hours later.Patients were given i/v antibiotics,painkillers and i/v PPIs and shifted to oral pain killers on 2nd POD.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients older than 15 years with acute abdominal symptoms admitted in ER department, suspected as perforated duodenal ulcer and operated within 24 hours of admission by emergency department surgeon.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting with the following criteria were excluded:
* Refusal to join the study
* Peptic ulcers with both bleeding and perforation.
* Spontaneously sealed off perforations.
* Malignant ulcers
* Concurrent extra-abdominal surgery
* Oral incapacity i.e endotracheal intubation
* Reoperation within a month
* ASA grade III/IV
* Alternative per operative diagnosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ayesha Masood

Postgraduate trainee, General Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Surgical Unit I,Benazir Bhutto Hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

pdu

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Glutamine on Gastric Emptying
NCT00943020 COMPLETED PHASE4
ERAS Protocol in Newborns: CARES Study
NCT05511233 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA