ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT

NCT ID: NCT04194060

Last Updated: 2022-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-20

Study Completion Date

2021-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares 2 different ways of perioperative management in patients of peptic perforation. Experimental arm is the ERAS arm( Enhanced recovery after surgery) and the comparative arm is Conventional arm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While the conventional approach to perioperative management can potentially prolong the post operative hospital stay, ERAS(Enhanced recovery after surgery), a multi-modal and multispeciality approach to perioperative management may reduce the length of hospital stay. In the preoperative period, patients will be counselled regarding the operative procedure and particulars of the perioperative management.In the intra-operative period short acting general anesthetic agents and short acting muscle relaxants will be used.Intravenous fluid administration will be goal directed. After the operative procedure, bilateral rectus sheath block will be administered. Patient will also receive post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Nasogastric tube will be removed immediately after the operative procedure. In the post operative period, patients will be encouraged to ambulate early. Enteral nutrition will be initiated as early as possible. Indwelling catheters will be removed in the early post-operative procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peptic Ulcer Perforation Perforated Bowel Post-Op Complication Emergencies Perioperative Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patient will be allocated into two arms, ERAS(Enhanced recovery after surgery) group and Conventional group. 30 patients will be recruited in each arm.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enhanced recovery after surgery group

ERAS GROUP

* Tracheal intubation.
* Short acting anesthetic agents,avoid opioid agents
* Omental patch repair with placement of sub hepatic drain
* Bilateral Transverse abdominis plane block/ Rectus sheath block immediately after surgery.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Encourage to mobilize out of bed after effect of general anesthesia has weaned off.
* Initiation of feeding-Oral sips on day 1, step up day 2 onward
* Removal of nasogastric tube-immediately after surgery after aspirating the gastric content through nasogastric tube.
* Removal of urinary catheter-after weaning from the effect of general anesthesia.
* Sub hepatic drain removal -anytime within 24 hours;drain will not be removed if fluid is bilious or pus.
* Avoid opiod analgesics.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery group

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

* Tracheal intubation and with General anesthesia
* Short acting anesthetic agents,avoid opioid agents
* Omental patch repair with placement of sub hepatic drain
* Bilateral Transverse abdominis plane block/ Rectus sheath block immediately after surgery.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Encourage to mobilize out of bed after effect of general anesthesia has weaned off.
* Initiation of feeding-Oral sips on day 1, step up day 2 onward
* Removal of nasogastric tube-immediately after surgery after aspirating the gastric content through nasogastric tube.
* Removal of urinary catheter-after weaning from the effect of general anesthesia.
* Sub hepatic drain removal -anytime within 24 hours;drain will not be removed if fluid is bilious or pus.
* Avoid opiod analgesics.

Conventional group

CONVENTIONAL GROUP

* Tracheal intubation
* Short acting anesthetic agents, avoid opiod anesthesia agents.
* Omental patch repair along with sub hepatic drain placement.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Ambulation-as per patients' own request.
* Initiation of oral feed- after passage of 1st flatus.
* Nasogastric tube removal-output \<300ml/day with resolution of ileus.
* Removal of urinary catheter- when patient sits on bed side/ambulate.
* Removal of sub hepatic drain-when patient tolerates unrestricted amount of liquid diet and drain output is less than 200 ml /day.
* Patient will receive opiod analgesics.

I

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Tracheal intubation

* Short acting anesthetic agents, avoid opiod anesthesia agents.
* Omental patch repair along with sub hepatic drain placement.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Ambulation-as per patients' own request.
* Initiation of oral feed- after passage of 1st flatus.
* Nasogastric tube removal-output \<300ml/day with resolution of ileus.
* Removal of urinary catheter- when patient sits on bed side/ambulate.
* Removal of sub hepatic drain-when patient tolerates unrestricted amount of liquid diet and drain output is less than 200 ml /day.
* Patient will receive opiod analgesics.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery group

* Tracheal intubation and with General anesthesia
* Short acting anesthetic agents,avoid opioid agents
* Omental patch repair with placement of sub hepatic drain
* Bilateral Transverse abdominis plane block/ Rectus sheath block immediately after surgery.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Encourage to mobilize out of bed after effect of general anesthesia has weaned off.
* Initiation of feeding-Oral sips on day 1, step up day 2 onward
* Removal of nasogastric tube-immediately after surgery after aspirating the gastric content through nasogastric tube.
* Removal of urinary catheter-after weaning from the effect of general anesthesia.
* Sub hepatic drain removal -anytime within 24 hours;drain will not be removed if fluid is bilious or pus.
* Avoid opiod analgesics.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Conventional

Tracheal intubation

* Short acting anesthetic agents, avoid opiod anesthesia agents.
* Omental patch repair along with sub hepatic drain placement.
* Post operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.
* Ambulation-as per patients' own request.
* Initiation of oral feed- after passage of 1st flatus.
* Nasogastric tube removal-output \<300ml/day with resolution of ileus.
* Removal of urinary catheter- when patient sits on bed side/ambulate.
* Removal of sub hepatic drain-when patient tolerates unrestricted amount of liquid diet and drain output is less than 200 ml /day.
* Patient will receive opiod analgesics.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient diagnosed with peptic perforation intra -operatively
2. Perforation of size \<=1 cm
3. Patient age more than 18 years
4. American Society of Anesthesiologists score of I or II

Exclusion Criteria

1. Refractory septic shock at presentation.
2. Known Chronic kidney disease/ Chronic liver disease patients
3. Pregnant patients.
4. Patients with history of chronic steroid abuse.
5. Intraoperatively

* Patient with coexistent peptic perforation with bleeding ulcer.
* Peptic perforation requiring procedure other than Omental patch repair.
* Sealed perforations.
* Malignant perforation.
6. Patient requiring Positive Pressure Ventilator support post operatively for more than 12 hours.
7. Patient requiring urinary catheterization for other indications.
8. Coexistent neurological or psychiatric illness or unable to understand the study.
9. Patient refusing for consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tushar Subhadarshan Mishra

Additional Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

TUSHAR S MISHRA, MBBS,MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tushar S Mishra

Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mohsina S, Shanmugam D, Sureshkumar S, Kundra P, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. Adapted ERAS Pathway vs. Standard Care in Patients with Perforated Duodenal Ulcer-a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):107-116. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3474-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28653239 (View on PubMed)

Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency colorectal surgery: Review of literature and current practices. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):41-52. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.41.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30842811 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal A, Jain S, Meena LN, Jain SA, Agarwal L. Validation of Boey's score in predicting morbidity and mortality in peptic perforation peritonitis in Northwestern India. Trop Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct-Dec;36(4):256-60. doi: 10.7869/tg.300.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27509704 (View on PubMed)

Gonenc M, Dural AC, Celik F, Akarsu C, Kocatas A, Kalayci MU, Dogan Y, Alis H. Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2014 Jun;207(6):807-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24119887 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AIIMS BBSR/PGT/2019-20/65

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ERAS Protocol in Newborns: CARES Study
NCT05511233 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Effects of Glutamine on Gastric Emptying
NCT00943020 COMPLETED PHASE4
Postoperative Oral Intake Trial
NCT00134407 COMPLETED PHASE1