Early Oral Feeding Versus Traditional Delayed Oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair
NCT ID: NCT06042933
Last Updated: 2025-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-02
2024-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short Term Outcome Following Post Operative Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer
NCT06570018
Early Oral Feeding vs Traditional Post-operative Care In Emergency Abdominal Surgeries
NCT04431037
Incidence Rate and Risk Factors of Malnutrition in ICU
NCT06047054
Gradual Versus Immediate Goal-dose Enteral Nutrition in Abdominal Surgery Patients
NCT03117348
Delayed vs Early Enteral Feeding After Anterior Sagittal Anorectopexy
NCT05297916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is a single-center, prospective, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either delayed oral feeding or early oral feeding.
Methods:
Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A patients followed an early oral feeding protocol(12 hours), and Group B received delayed oral feeding (72 hours).
Outcome parameter :
The outcomes are incidence of postoperative complications including Postoperative repair leakage, Infection-related postoperative complications , Number of days of hospital stay and return of bowel function and Diet intolerance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
early oral intake 6 hours postoperative.
Post operative early oral feeding
To start oral feeding 6 hours after perforated peptic ulcer repairs
Group B
delayed oral intake after 72 hours
Traditional delayed oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repairs
To start oral feeding after 48 hours
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Post operative early oral feeding
To start oral feeding 6 hours after perforated peptic ulcer repairs
Traditional delayed oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repairs
To start oral feeding after 48 hours
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
presented to the emergency surgical team and were diagnosed with perforated duodenal ulcer by surgicalteam, were recruited and assessed for eligibility.
Exclusion Criteria
* Delayed presentation more than 24 hours.
* The presence of neuropsychiatric disease, pregnant and lactating women.
* Predisposing factors for impaired wound healing (e.g., currently using immunosuppressive agents, or chronic use of steroids), the presence of HIV.
* American society of anesthesiologists grade iii/iv, or had an alternative perioperative diagnosis.
* Intraoperatively, after randomization, patients were excluded based on the following criteria: perforated duodenal ulcer ≥20 mm, consistent with malignant ulcers.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammed Elshwadfy Nageeb
lecturer of general surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mohammed elshwadfy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N-96-2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.