Effects of Bolus and Continuous Nasogastric Feeding on Small Bowel Water Content and Blood Flow
NCT ID: NCT01557673
Last Updated: 2013-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study we want to use a non invasive medical imaging technique called "magnetic resonance imaging" (or MRI) to look at the volume of bowel water following these two feeding strategies in 12 healthy volunteers.
Each volunteer will have a tube inserted into the stomach via the nose and undergo the two feeding strategies at least 7 days apart. We will take repeated images using the MRI scanner to assess the bowel response and some samples of blood are required for analysis of blood sugar.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Nasogastric Tube Application in Postoperative Care of Esophagectomy
NCT03273686
The Impact of Low Calorie and Low Nitrogen Parenteral Nutrition Support on the Clinical Outcome of Postoperative Patients
NCT00247338
Feeding Tube in Cancer Patients
NCT02675673
Bolus Pouch Feed Study
NCT05822557
Home Jejunostomy Feeding Following Esophagectomy/Gastrectomy
NCT01870817
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Aims. This study aims to investigate the influence of bolus or continuous NG feeding on small bowel fluid content and superior mesenteric blood flow. Our hypothesis is that bolus NG feeding results in lower small bowel fluid secretion and a reduction in superior mesenteric artery blood flow in comparison to individuals who are bolus NG fed.
3. Experimental protocol and methods.
This is a single-centre, cross-over study involving 12 healthy volunteers. Two studies will be undertaken for each volunteer approximately 7 days apart:
* Tube bolus (TB): feed administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
* Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): feed pump delivered via the NG tube over 4 h.
The sequence of treatment allocations will be concealed to assessors until all interventions, data collection, and statistical analysis has been completed.
Subjects will be asked to arrive at 8:30 a.m. at the Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance 1.5T, University of Nottingham, having abstained from alcohol, caffeine-containing drinks, and any medication for at least 24 h prior to the study, as well as having fasted overnight. An 80 cm 8FR Freka (Fresenius Kabi, Runcorn, UK) fine bore nasogastric (NG) tube will be inserted into the stomach via the nose as well as a cannula in the ante cubital fossa for blood sampling. The position of the NG tube will be verified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Once the tube is sited, the volunteer will be asked to sit for 5 min in order to allow the tubes to settle and the body adapt to their presence. Following NG intubation subjects will undergo baseline MRI scanning and blood sampling for glucose, insulin and PYY. Feeding will commence at time 0. Scanning and blood tests will proceed at 30 min intervals for a total of 4 h. The feed used in all studies will be 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink (Nestle Nutrition, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A), which is typical of a standard oral supplement.
In the TB study arm the supplement will be administered through the NG tube via syringes over 5 min; and in the TD study the feed will be administered using a pump at a rate of 100 ml/h for 4 h.
4. Measurable end points/statistical power of the study. Primary endpoint: Small bowel water content (SBWC). Secondary endpoints: Superior mesenteric artery blood flow, gastric content emptying time, plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin and peptide YY (PYY). Previous work using mannitol and glucose indicates that mean (SD) SBWC at 40 minutes postprandially after ingesting 300ml glucose was 47 (SD 15) and using n=10 we calculate we can detect a difference of 17 ml (36%) between interventions with 90% power. We plan to recruit 12 to allow for dropouts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NG bolus feeding over 5 min
Tube bolus (TB): feed administered via syringe through NG tube over 5 min.
NG bolus feeding over 5 min
Tube bolus (TB): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
Continuous NG feeding over 4 h
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): feed pump delivered via the NG tube over 4 h.
Continuous NG feeding over 4 h
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., delivered via feeding pump through the NG tube over 4 h.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NG bolus feeding over 5 min
Tube bolus (TB): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., administered via the NG tube over 5 min.
Continuous NG feeding over 4 h
Continuous tube drip feeding (TD): 400 ml of Resource® Energy Vanilla nutrient drink, Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., delivered via feeding pump through the NG tube over 4 h.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male
* Able to undergo safe magnetic resonance scanning
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic medical conditions
* Regular medication
* Unable to undergo safe magentic resonance scanning
* Previous abdominal surgery
* Smoking
18 Years
65 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nottingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abeed H Chowdhury, BSc MRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nottingham
Tim Bowling, MD FRCP
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dempsey DT, Mullen JL, Buzby GP. The link between nutritional status and clinical outcome: can nutritional intervention modify it? Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Feb;47(2 Suppl):352-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.2.352.
Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut. 2003 Dec;52 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):vii1-vii12. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.suppl_7.vii1. No abstract available.
Keohane PP, Attrill H, Love M, Frost P, Silk DB. Relation between osmolality of diet and gastrointestinal side effects in enteral nutrition. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 3;288(6418):678-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6418.678.
Kocan MJ, Hickisch SM. A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients. J Neurosci Nurs. 1986 Dec;18(6):333-7. doi: 10.1097/01376517-198612000-00004.
Sarap AN, Sarap MD, Childers J. Small bowel necrosis in association with jejunal tube feeding. JAAPA. 2010 Nov;23(11):28, 30-2. doi: 10.1097/01720610-201011000-00006.
Melis M, Fichera A, Ferguson MK. Bowel necrosis associated with early jejunal tube feeding: A complication of postoperative enteral nutrition. Arch Surg. 2006 Jul;141(7):701-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.701.
Lobo DN, Hendry PO, Rodrigues G, Marciani L, Totman JJ, Wright JW, Preston T, Gowland P, Spiller RC, Fearon KC. Gastric emptying of three liquid oral preoperative metabolic preconditioning regimens measured by magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adult volunteers: a randomised double-blind, crossover study. Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Hoad CL, Marciani L, Foley S, Totman JJ, Wright J, Bush D, Cox EF, Campbell E, Spiller RC, Gowland PA. Non-invasive quantification of small bowel water content by MRI: a validation study. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Dec 7;52(23):6909-22. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/23/009. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
Marciani L, Cox EF, Hoad CL, Pritchard S, Totman JJ, Foley S, Mistry A, Evans S, Gowland PA, Spiller RC. Postprandial changes in small bowel water content in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010 Feb;138(2):469-77, 477.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.055. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H062011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.