Use of Implanting the Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Drug Coated Balloon to Treat Failing Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas and Grafts.
NCT ID: NCT04381754
Last Updated: 2020-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-06-30
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A meta-analysis performed by Khawaja et al. seemed to suggest that DCBs conferred some benefit in terms of improving target lesion primary patency (TLPP) in AVFs. An updated meta-analysis performed by our own institution recently showed that DCB appears to be a better and safe alternative to conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA) in treating patients with HD stenosis based on 6- and 12-months primary patency and increased intervention free period.
The Passeo-18 Lux (Biotronik Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Singapore)) drug-coated balloon (DCB) is packaged with a low dose of paclitaxel. Recent studies have shown that low dose coating of paclitaxel with this DCB is useful for preventing restenosis, decrease lumen loss and target lesion revascularization in the peripheral vasculature6 but has not been tested in the dialysis access circuit.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Recurrent Stenoses in Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) for Dialysis Access: CuttIng ballooN angioplaSTy Combined wITh Paclitaxel drUg coaTed Balloon Angioplasty, an observatIONal Clinical Study
NCT05018962
Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Drug-coated Balloon to Plain Balloon for All Peripheral AVF Stenosis
NCT06553443
Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloons for Treatment of Dysfunctional AV Fistulae and Grafts
NCT02183194
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing DEB Versus Conventional PTA for the Treatment of Hemodialysis AVF or AVG Stenoses
NCT01544907
Lutonix® Global AV Registry Investigating Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon for Treatment of Native and Synthetic AV Fistulae
NCT02746159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AVG/AVF Treated with Passeo-18 Lux
Patients with failing dialysis access, treated lesions located between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction.
Passeo-18 Lux
Patients with significant inflow or outflow stenosis between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction, as defined by the insertion of the cephalic vein, who had undergone fistuloplasty with Passeo-18 Lux
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Passeo-18 Lux
Patients with significant inflow or outflow stenosis between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction, as defined by the insertion of the cephalic vein, who had undergone fistuloplasty with Passeo-18 Lux
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Native AVF was created more than 2 months prior to the index procedure and had undergone 10 or more hemodialysis sessions utilizing 2 needles
* Target lesion location had to be located between the anastomosis to the axillary-subclavian vein junction, as defined by insertion of the cephalic vein.
* On initial fistulogram, target lesion stenosis had to be \>50% on angiographic assessment and in keeping with the clinical indicator for intervention
* Stenosis had to be \< 10cm in length to allow for potential treatment with one PCB (length 12 cm) only
* Stenosis had to be initially treated successfully with a high-pressure plain balloon prior to PCB treatment as defined by:
1. No clinically significant dissection
2. No extravasation requiring treatment/stenting
3. Residual stenosis ≤20% by angiographic measurement
4. Ability to completely efface the lesion waist using the pre-dilation balloon
* No more than one additional ("nontarget") lesions in the access circuit that had to be also successfully treated (≤30% residual stenosis) before drug elution. Separate lesion was defined by at least 3 cm in distance from the target lesion.
* Reference vessel diameter 4mm - 8mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject had more than two lesions in the access circuit
* Subject had a secondary non-target lesion that could not be successfully treated
* Sepsis or active infection
* Asymptomatic target lesions
* A thrombosed access or an access with thrombosis treated ≤30 days prior to the index procedure
* Surgical revision of the access site performed, planned or expected ≤ 3 months before or after the index procedure
* Patients who were taking immunosuppressive therapy or are routinely taking ≥ 15 mg of prednisone per day;
* Currently participating in an another investigational drug, biologic, or device study involving sirolimus or paclitaxel
* Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel usage
* Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, or language barrier such that the subject is unable to give informed consent
* Uncooperative attitude or potential for non-compliance with the requirements of the protocol making study participation impractical
* Where final angioplasty treatment requires a stent or drug eluting balloon \> 8mm in diameter
* Metastatic cancer or terminal medical condition
* Blood coagulation disorders
* Limited life expectancy (\< 12 months)
* Allergy or other known contraindication to iodinated media contrast, heparin or paclitaxel
21 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Singapore General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tang Tjun Yip
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sinapore General Hospital
Yap Hao Yun
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Singapore General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Troisi N, Frosini P, Somma C, Romano E, Guidotti A, Dattolo PC, Ferro G, Chisci E, Michelagnoli S. Drug-coated balloons reduce the risk of recurrent restenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis. Int Angiol. 2018 Feb;37(1):59-63. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.17.03886-X. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Liao MT, Chen MK, Hsieh MY, Yeh NL, Chien KL, Lin CC, Wu CC, Chie WC. Drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula or graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231463. eCollection 2020.
Kennedy SA, Mafeld S, Baerlocher MO, Jaberi A, Rajan DK. Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Hemodialysis Circuits: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):483-494.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
Khawaja AZ, Cassidy DB, Al Shakarchi J, McGrogan DG, Inston NG, Jones RG. Systematic review of drug eluting balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous haemodialysis access stenosis. J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):103-10. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000508. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
Yan Wee IJ, Yap HY, Hsien Ts'ung LT, Lee Qingwei S, Tan CS, Tang TY, Chong TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for dialysis access stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):970-979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.082.
Brodmann M, Zeller T, Christensen J, Binkert C, Spak L, Schroder H, Righini P, Nano G, Tepe G. Real-world experience with a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the treatment of atherosclerotic infrainguinal arteries: 12-month interim results of the BIOLUX P-III registry first year of enrolment. J Vasc Bras. 2017 Oct-Dec;16(4):276-284. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.007317.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1.5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.