Preoperative Use of Fractional Flow Reserve in CABG Use and Effectiveness of FFR-based CABG in Real-life Practice

NCT ID: NCT04379947

Last Updated: 2020-07-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-31

Study Completion Date

2021-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is controversial and not ubiquitously adopted across the units. There is no definitive evidence that the use of FFR improves early clinical outcomes after CABG, with the exception of a simplification of the procedure. FFR use may help in defining the indication to the use arterial grafts, but there is no evidence that preoperative FFR lead to any benefits in terms of patency when venous grafts are used.

On these grounds a large multicentric all-comers observational study is planned. The aim is to achieve a real-life picture of the FFR practice in CABG across several European and non-European units. This study will inform on the effective use rate of FFR in the CABG practice and its clinical effectiveness when compared to standard angiography-based CABG.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background The use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is controversial. A large retrospective study on 627 patients by Toth et al. showed that FFR-guided surgery was associated with a lower number of graft anastomoses and a lower rate of on-pump surgery compared with angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This did not result in a higher event rate during up to 36 months of follow-up and was associated with a lower rate of angina. The six years follow-up of the same study showed that FFR-guided CABG was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of overall death or myocardial infarction at 6-year follow-up as compared with angiography-guided CABG.

However, the three randomized studies on FFR-based CABG have achieved contradictive results. The FARGO (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization) and GRAFFITI (GRAft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided CABG) did not report a significant impact on hard outcomes at 1 year. Conversely, the IMPAG trial support the use of preoperative FFR in total arterial CABG. Authors found a significant association between the preoperative FFR measurement of the target vessel and the anastomotic functionality at 6 months, with a cut-off of 0.78. Authors concluded that integration of FFR measurement into the preoperative diagnostic workup could lead to improved anastomotic graft function.

The currently available randomized evidences might have been flawed by limitations including underpowering, entry selectivity bias, cross over among treatment, difference in the type of conduits used and presence of unexpected confounders related to surgeons' reluctance to base their surgical strategy on FFR. These drawbacks not only hamper the reliability of the results, but more importantly, reduce their translatability to the real-life clinical world.

Given the lack of definitive evidences and the difficulty of RCT to capture the real-life scenario of the clinical practice, we plan to perform a large multicentric all-comers study comparing the practice of FFR in CABG across several European and non-European units.

The main aim is to obtain information on

* Use rate of FFR in preoperative planning of surgical candidates
* Effective adherence to FFR guidance during elective surgery and identification of factors eventually limiting observance to FFR information
* Short and long-term outcomes of FFR-based CABG in comparison to standard angiography-based CABG
* Post hoc analysis in relation to type of conduit used, completeness of revascularization, surgeon experience, volume/outcome relationship.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracational Flow Reserve Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FFR-CABG

Patients with at least one intermediate stenosis that received a preoperative FFR evaluation before being referred for CABG

Fractional Flow reserve

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Measurement of fractional flow reserve in the preoperative work-up for oronary artery bypass surgery

Angio-CABG

Patients with at least one intermediate stenosis that did not received a preoperative FFR evaluation before being referred for CABG

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fractional Flow reserve

Measurement of fractional flow reserve in the preoperative work-up for oronary artery bypass surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all-comers" including both elective and urgent (and urgent in-house) isolated CABG cases

Exclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing emergency revascularization for iatrogenic complications or other conditions that would prevent a careful analysis of angiographic severity of the lesions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Glasgow

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cristiano Spadaccio

Clinical Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cristiano Spadaccio, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Glasgow

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sundermann S, Dademasch A, Praetorius J, Kempfert J, Dewey T, Falk V, Mohr FW, Walther T. Comprehensive assessment of frailty for elderly high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.04.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20627611 (View on PubMed)

Coulson TG, Mullany DV, Reid CM, Bailey M, Pilcher D. Measuring the quality of perioperative care in cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):11-19. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28927188 (View on PubMed)

Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25173339 (View on PubMed)

Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, De Vroey F, Pyxaras S, Di Serafino L, Van Praet F, Van Mieghem C, Stockman B, Wijns W, Degrieck I, Barbato E. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2013 Sep 24;128(13):1405-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002740. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23985788 (View on PubMed)

Fournier S, Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Johnson NP, Ciccarelli G, Xaplanteris P, Milkas A, Strisciuglio T, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Casselman F, Van Praet F, Stockman B, Degrieck I, Barbato E. Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29848611 (View on PubMed)

Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, Christiansen EH, Jensen SE, Modrau I, Andreasen JJ, Junker A, Mortensen PE, Jensen LO. Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 4;72(22):2732-2743. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30497559 (View on PubMed)

Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Kala P, Ribichini FL, Casselman F, Ramos R, Piroth Z, Fournier S, Piccoli A, Van Mieghem C, Penicka M, Mates M, Nemec P, Van Praet F, Stockman B, Degriek I, Barbato E. Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial. EuroIntervention. 2019 Dec 6;15(11):e999-e1005. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31270037 (View on PubMed)

Glineur D, Grau JB, Etienne PY, Benedetto U, Fortier JH, Papadatos S, Laruelle C, Pieters D, El Khoury E, Blouard P, Timmermans P, Ruel M, Chong AY, So D, Chan V, Rubens F, Gaudino MF. Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 1;40(29):2421-2428. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz329.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31155673 (View on PubMed)

Spadaccio C, Glineur D, Barbato E, Di Franco A, Oldroyd KG, Biondi-Zoccai G, Crea F, Fremes SE, Angiolillo DJ, Gaudino M. Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1086-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32222443 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UG-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drainage Technique in CABG
NCT07194798 NOT_YET_RECRUITING