Five-year Patency of No-touch Saphenous Vein Grafts in On-pump Versus Clamp-less Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03447197

Last Updated: 2018-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-01

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown high long-term patency for no-touch saphenous vein grafts (NTSVGs), comparable to the internal thoracic artery in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). RCTs on patency in NTSVGs in off-pump CABG have not been published yet. Orebro University Hospital participated in the CABG Off- or On-pump Revascularization study (CORONARY, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00463294) and included fifty-six patients. Accordingly, this is a sub-study and the aim was to assess the midterm patency in NTSVGs in clamp-less off-pump versus on-pump CABG at five-year follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Stenoses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

On-Pump

Use of extracorporeal circulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The use of extracorporeal circulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The use or not of extracorporeal circulation during the coronary artery bypass procedure.

Off-Pump

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The use of extracorporeal circulation

The use or not of extracorporeal circulation during the coronary artery bypass procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients were eligible if they:

1. provided written informed consent;
2. were \>21 years of age;
3. required isolated CABG with median sternotomy;
4. had at least one of the following risk factors:

1. had peripheral vascular disease (previous peripheral bypass, amputation or anklebranchial index \<0.90),
2. had cerebrovascular disease (history of stroke, transient ischemic attach or carotid stenosis ≥70%),
3. had renal insufficiency (creatinine above upper limit of normal),
4. were ≥70 years of age, or
5. were between the ages of 60-69 with one of the following: i. had diabetes and taking an oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin, ii. required urgent revascularization (i.e., waiting in hospital for revascularization after an acute coronary syndrome), iii. were a recent smoker (within 1 year of randomization), or iv. had left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, OR
6. were between the ages of 55-59 with two of the following: i. Diabetes and taking an oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin, ii. required urgent revascularization (i.e., waiting in hospital for revascularization after an acute coronary syndrome, iii. were a recent smoker (within 1 year of randomization), or iv. had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they:

1. required a concomitant cardiac procedure associated with CABG;
2. had a contraindication to off-pump or on-pump CABG (e.g., calcified aorta, intramuscular left anterior descending artery, calcified coronaries, small target vessels);
3. had a concomitant life-threatening disease likely to limit life expectancy to less than 2 years;
4. were previously enrollment in the CORONARY Trial;
5. required emergency CABG surgery (i.e., immediate revascularization for hemodynamic instability); OR
6. required a redo CABG.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Örebro County Council

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ninos Samano M.D.

Consultant in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OLL-689991

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein
NCT06014047 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA