Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

NCT ID: NCT06787651

Last Updated: 2025-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two surgical method groups: RIMA-SVG Group (150 patients): SVGs are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The aorta is clamped, and SVGs are connected to the ascending aorta (Ao).All patients will undergo CABG on a beating heart with sequential vein grafts to bypass at least two or more coronary vessels. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency. The secondary outcomes include neurological complications, mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and surgical site infection event.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial was divided into two groups, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, according to the surgical method. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of the RIMA-SVG surgical method in improving saphenous vein graft (SVG) patency and reducing clinical complications. A total of 300 patients undergoing CABG on a beating heart will be randomized into two surgical technique groups: RIMA-SV Group (150 patients): SVGs are anastomosed to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA). Ao-SVG Group (150 patients): The ascending aorta is clamped, and SVGs are anastomosed to the aorta. All patients will undergo CABG via median sternotomy, and the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) will be used to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD). SVGs will be sequentially grafted to the circumflex artery, diagonal branch, and right coronary artery. The primary outcome is 1-year graft patency, assessed by coronary CT angiography and classified using the FitzGibbon grading system. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), neurological complications, and surgical site infection event. Patients will be followed at 12 months for clinical evaluations and imaging assessments. Inclusion criteria include patients aged 18 to 80 years undergoing planned CABG with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts and who are able to provide written informed consent. Exclusion criteria include additional cardiac surgeries, severe subclavian artery stenosis, unsuitable SVGs (e.g. bilateral varicosities), history of intracranial hemorrhage, active bleeding, malignancy, or emergency surgery. Randomization will be computer-generated, and all aspects of the study will remain blinded to ensure unbiased assessments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Coronary Artery Disease Saphenous Vein Graft Patency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are randomly assigned to two groups based on surgical technique (RIMA-SVG vs. Ao-SVG)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The surgical team is unblinded during the procedure, but patients and investigators remain blinded throughout the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RIMA-SVG Group

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) will be connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RIMA-SVG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA)

Ao-SVG Group

SVGs will be connected directly to the ascending aorta.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ao-SVG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ascending aorta is clamped, and SVGs are anastomosed to the aorta.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RIMA-SVG

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are connected to the right internal mammary artery (RIMA)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ao-SVG

The ascending aorta is clamped, and SVGs are anastomosed to the aorta.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RIMA Ao

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged 18 to 80 years.
2. Scheduled for their first planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).
3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients unable to provide written informed consent.
2. Patients requiring other cardiac surgeries (e.g. valve replacement, congenital heart defect surgery, or aortic dissection repair).
3. Patients with severe stenosis of the left or right subclavian artery.
4. Patients for whom aortic clamping is infeasible due to calcification of the ascending aorta.
5. Patients with bilateral SVG varicosities unsuitable for grafting.
6. Patients with active malignancy.
7. Patients with active bleeding or a history of bleeding tendency.
8. Patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke within 14 days preoperatively, or severe carotid artery stenosis.
9. Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction.
10. Patients requiring emergency surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kexiang Liu, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

kexiang liu, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Second Hospital of Jilin University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

the Second Hospital of Jilin University

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wei R, Huang M, Jiang N, Zhang R, He T, Zhu C, Wang W, Piao H, Yu S, Zhu Z, Wang T, Liu K. RIMA-SVG versus Ao-SVG in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority and single-centre trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 28;15(9):e104578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104578.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41022447 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JDEYXXGWK460

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.