Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Study
NCT ID: NCT00139399
Last Updated: 2019-06-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
142 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1998-05-31
2006-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial - 10 Year Follow-up
NCT01622387
Comparison of Saphenous Vein Graft Harvested From Upper Versus Lower Leg in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT01974492
Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
NCT00054847
Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes Trial
NCT00475488
Radial Artery Versus No-touch Saphenous Vein
NCT06014047
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will compare angiographic patency of the radial artery or saphenous vein graft anastomosed to the native left circumflex coronary territory at 3 months and 5 years after surgery. A substudy will compare 5-year post-surgery diameter and blood flow of in-vivo radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in response to endothelium-dependent and non-endothelium-dependent stimuli when patients attend for their scheduled follow-up angiogram.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Saphenous vein
Saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass graft
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
Patients were randomized to receive either a radial artery or a long saphenous vein graft to the left circumflex coronary artery territory during CABG surgery
Radial artery
Radial artery aortocoronary bypass graft
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
Patients were randomized to receive either a radial artery or a long saphenous vein graft to the left circumflex coronary artery territory during CABG surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
Patients were randomized to receive either a radial artery or a long saphenous vein graft to the left circumflex coronary artery territory during CABG surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged 40-70 years
* significant stenosis (≥70%) in the circumflex territory as identified on preoperative angiograms
* negative Allen's test (defined as the return of palmar circulation within 5 seconds of releasing ulnar artery compression)
* willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* severe diffuse peripheral vascular disease or bilateral varicose venous disease
* inability to comply with the angiographic follow-up at 3 months or/and 5 years
40 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
OTHER
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
National Heart Foundation, Australia
OTHER
Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Charitable Foundation
OTHER
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neil E Moat, MS, FRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE; Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008 Jun 3;117(22):2859-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215. Epub 2008 May 27.
Chong WC, Collins P, Webb CM, De Souza AC, Pepper JR, Hayward CS, Moat NE. Comparison of flow characteristics and vascular reactivity of radial artery and long saphenous vein grafts [NCT00139399]. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Mar 3;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-1-4.
Webb CM, Moat NE, Chong CF, Collins P. Vascular reactivity and flow characteristics of radial artery and long saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts: a 5-year follow-up. Circulation. 2010 Aug 31;122(9):861-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887000. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LREC 98-010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.