Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-25
2020-01-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The sample consisted of 140 pregnant women. The study was conducted with three experimental groups and one control group, each including 35 pregnant women. Conventional acupressure and warm and cold acupressure procedures were performed on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point of the experimental group. No procedures were performed on the women in the control group. Data were collected using a "Personal Information Form", "Labor Intervention Follow-up Form", "Visual Analog Scale" and "Verbal Category Scale".
The comparison between the experimental and control groups indicated that the conventional acupressure procedure was effective in reducing labor pain and that the warm acupressure procedure increased endorphin levels.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Acupressure and Comfort at Childbirth
NCT05407103
The Effect of Massage and Acupressure on Labor Pain
NCT06057116
Delivery Pain and Postpartum Comfort
NCT04977713
Acupressure Applied After Cesarean Section on Postpartum Pain
NCT06138288
The Effect of Acupressure on Labor Pain and Anxiety Levels During Labor in Primiparas Women
NCT05411289
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Warm Acupressure Procedure Group
Latent phase Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first warm acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals.
Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second warm acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Warm Acupressure, Cold Acupressure , Conventional Acupressure
Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Cold Acupressure Procedure Group
Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase The first cold acupressure procedure was performed for ten minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated three more times at one-hour intervals.
Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second cold acupressure procedure was performed three times at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Warm Acupressure, Cold Acupressure , Conventional Acupressure
Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Conventional Acupressure Group
Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous blood sample taken Active phase Conventional acupressure was performed for 30 minutes on the Large Intestinal 4 energy meridian zone acupressure point on the non-dominant hand. This process was repeated twice more at one-hour intervals.
Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase The second conventional acupressure procedure was performed twice at one-hour intervals A 30-minute break was given Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed Second venous blood sample taken
Warm Acupressure, Cold Acupressure , Conventional Acupressure
Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Control Group
Latent phase Visual Analog Scale I and Verbal Category Scale I given as pretest First venous sample taken Active phase
No procedure other than the routine clinical practices were carried out. Visual Analog Scale II and Verbal Category Scale II were measured at the end of the active phase Transition phase No procedure other than the normal clinical routines was conducted Visual Analog Scale III and Verbal Category Scale III were performed. Second venous blood sample taken
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Warm Acupressure, Cold Acupressure , Conventional Acupressure
Acupressure is non-invasive, safe and effective.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having intact membranes
* No skin diseases (such as urticaria...),
* No use of narcotic drugs
* Having a term pregnancy
* Having a single fetus at vertex position
* Planning to have vaginal delivery
* Having contractions and ongoing regular augmentation
* Having recent augmentation starting periods
* Being in the latent phase (0-3 cm dilatation)
* Having no history of high-risk pregnancy
* Not using analgesic drugs to reduce pain during delivery
* Having no systemic and neurologic diseases
* Having no contraction anomaly (hypotonic or hypertonic contractions)
Exclusion Criteria
\-
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Serap ÖZTÜRK ALTINAYAK
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Serap ÖZTÜRK ALTINAYAK
PhD, Academician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hava Özkan, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Atatürk University Faculty of Health Science, Department of Midwifery,
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Research and Training Hospital of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University
Tokat Province, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25.09.2018-04/2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.